Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

/prog/ 'memes' are dumb because

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-23 16:33

There's like 30 people total that post here.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-23 16:36

>>1
/prog/ mythology states that there is only you, me and the Sussman trolling us constantly.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-23 16:46

>>2
I can insure you that there's more people posting!

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-23 16:48

>>1
sed -e 's/memes/shibboleths/' -e 's/dumb/awesome' < />/>1

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-23 18:22

>>1
More like 3

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-23 18:51

>>3
Back to /lounge/, MILKRIBS

Name: gjs 2009-05-23 19:34

Just you and me, actually. The other guy left a while ago.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-23 19:53

>>7
Wait... but I am The Sussman.

HIBTM?

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-23 20:39

>>1
Actually, MrVacBob once posted here about the number of distinct IP's coming from posts on /prog/. It was close to 20,000

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-23 20:41

>>9
Then why is /prog/so damn slow?

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-23 20:45

>>9
Sussman using his Wand of Infinite Proxies.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-23 20:48

>>10
Assuming it's over 4 years, 20,000 isn't a lot.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-23 21:35

>>10
Because the Sussman has erected a magical shield all over /prog/ which enables only the predestined ones who have the chance of achieving Satori to post.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-23 21:50

Because the Sussman has erected

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-23 21:51

>>14
Oh yeah, giggity giggity

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-24 3:43

I wish like 30 people posted here. I would hate to think it's just one or two guys always posting the same crap over and over.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-24 4:07

>>16
It's just you and I.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-24 8:27

I wish like 30 people posted here. I would hate to think it's just one or two guys always posting the same crap over and over.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-24 8:28

>>18
It's just you and I.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-24 8:45

I wish like 30 people posted here. I would hate to think it's just one or two guys always posting the same crap over and over.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-24 9:50

I wish like 30 people posted here. I would hate to think it's just one or two guys always posting the same crap over and over.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-24 10:45

>>19
JUST THE TWO OF US
WE CAN MAKE IT IF WE TRY!
JUST THE TWO OF US
YOU AND I

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-24 11:00

I wish like 30 people posted here. I would hate to think it's just one or two guys always posting the same crap over and over.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-24 13:26

>>9
 heard of dynamic IP and shutting down computers for the night?

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-24 14:12

>>24
Have you heard of DHCP leases with a duration greater than a single session? Because nearly all ISPs certainly have.
``Dynamic'' IPs for the most part aren't nearly as dynamic as you think they are.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-24 17:02

I think honestly there's at least 50 people here daily.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-24 17:51

>>25
my IP address changes every time I connect to the internet.
considering that i use ancient 56Kbps dialup technology, that's three or four times each day atleast

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-24 19:04

>>27
MrVacBob's calculations disregarded the final subnet in the IP address.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-24 19:18

>>28
The "final subnet"? Read your RFCs again.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-24 19:22

>>29
Read
RFC

Now really, who actually does that. Not even the standards committees themselves read that shit.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-24 19:25

>>30
What about the April Fool's RFCs? I read them

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-24 19:28

>>29
It's clear enough that the meaning is final octet. You don't need an RFC to tell you that.

However.. Bureaucrat Conrad is technically correct -- the best kind of correct.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-24 19:52

i know you'll miss the way they serve bacardi around here

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-24 20:12

>>32
Expert Fututama Referencer

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-24 21:56

>>34
Expert Fututama Referencer
No Expert tags
Fututama
0/10

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-24 23:37

BBCODE

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-24 23:38

1
>> 2
>>> 3

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-24 23:38

a

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-24 23:40

>>36
>>37
>>38
Stop it.

Name: NO EXCEPTIONS MEME FAN 2009-05-24 23:49

I think its quite funny when someone says "NO EXCEPTIONS" then the next reply is "POSTING IN A NO EXCEPTIONS THREAD"

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List