>>33
NTSC->PAL conversion is GAY. Say no to automatic motion compensated NTSC->PAL conversions!
Have you ever looked at artifacts generated by such conversions, it blurs/blends images and looks ugly. What's even worse is when video authoring companies in PAL lands take a film was was originally progressive (24fps FILM) which got telecined(which is losslessly reversible back to FILM, as it works by duplicating fields) to 29.97fps NTSC and just blend it down to 25fps(PAL) using your beloved ``motion search aided framerate conversion techniques''. The TV sets should just support both PAL and NTSC.
I'm not arguing against PAL here, of course video game programmers should make appropriate versions of their games which follow the appropriate standard. I'm only arguing that NTSC->PAL conversion by motion compensated techniques tends to be ugly and unnecessary, and that TV sets should just support both standards.