>>6
You can have access to it, but only if you payhim enough ;)
Name:
Anonymous2009-05-19 8:57
>>5
There is some software thats runs faster in wine. If its been developed for windows, like e.g. cygwin it would obviously be faster there or in emulator which provides same layers of abstraction.
Name:
Anonymous2009-05-19 9:04
>>8
I still don't see how cygwin under wine could run faster than the native Gnu Coreutils
>>10
Argument is invalid. Even if your premise is granted, your second statement does not follow.
Name:
Anonymous2009-05-19 9:53
Tards, WINE stands for "WINE Is Not an Emulator". What is meant by this is that the code runs natively on your processor, just as though you booted windows. GUYS EVERYONE KNOWS THIS
>>14 linux et al
Learn what that means, young man. And please abstain from erroneously using baroquely sounding abbreviations in place of more common ones.
Name:
Anonymous2009-05-19 10:27
One cannot use Wine to run binaries that target the x86/Windows platform if the host architecture isn't x86 simply because Wine is not an emulator. Wine is an implementation of the Win32 and DirectX API. Wine is intended to be compatible with the native implementation.
Except exe is JIT and linux et al are multi-arch. Thus it cannot run natively on a processor.
Cool story bro.
Name:
Anonymous2009-05-19 10:50
I TOLD YOU SO
Name:
Anonymous2009-05-19 10:54
>>17 Learn what that means, young man.
What makes you think he doesn't know what et al. means? His use of it is quite tasteless, though, I must agree.
>>30-32
Shot in the dark here, but I'm willing to bet in some monetary amount that this is the same person.
Name:
Anonymous2010-03-06 5:55
Annnnnnddd ladies and gentlemen [drumroll please]
THATS THE END OF THE THREAD
no more posts past here
------------------------------------------------------------------
Name:
Anonymous2010-03-06 6:03
You're being trolled. Cygwin fork emulation is slow as fuck. Configure in cygwin is, like, 10 times slower than on linux.