Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-

Writing a demo for linux

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-14 1:49

Hi there /prog/,  I want to write an opengl demo for Linux using sepples, preferably using SDL or something cross-platformy so it will be easier to port to windows at a later point in time.  Can someone point me to one of those "talk to me like like I'm a 5 year old" resources to help me get opengl working with g++ on Ubuntu. 

Also, I'm used to using emacs for coding sepples on linux, but have mostly just used it for school projects just a few files.  This project will probably be a bit more complex though and cause my feeble mind more headaches without an IDE, so are there any good IDE's out there that work with emacs?

Thanks for the help /prog/

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-14 1:53

nehe.gamedev.net
GLUT or OGRE if they'll let you.
good IDE is Programmers Notepad (just kidding, i don't really know a good ide, but i use PN)

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-14 3:00

>>1
want to write ... using Sepples
Jesus.

How many files do you plan on using, here? Emacs will be great.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-14 3:39

>>3
Emacs will be great.
IHBT

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-14 3:57

>>4
Who T you, brother? I shall avenge thee!

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-14 5:59

>>4
What's wrong with Emacs?

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-14 6:53

>>6
Do you really want that question answered?

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-14 10:18

>>6
There are plenty of things wrong. However, it also happens to be the lesser broken programming environments.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-14 10:27

feeble mind
emacs
It's not for you, >>1. You don't want to cause your mind too much strain trying to comprehend the sheer majesty of Emacs.

Name: vi 2009-05-14 12:20

  ____________
 | ____  ____ |
 ||    ||    ||      Hello?
 || `Д｀）||    ||
 ||====||====||
 ||    ||    ||
 ||____||____||
 |____________|

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-14 13:29

  ____________
 | ____  ____ |
 ||    ||    ||      Hello?
 ||`Д`)||    ||
 ||====||====||
 ||    ||    ||
 ||____||____||
 |____________|

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-14 13:42

>>11
Yes?

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-14 14:34

[mm]  ____________
 | ____  ____ |
 ||    ||    ||      Hello?
 ||`Д`)||    ||
 ||====||====||
 ||    ||    ||
 ||____||____||
 |____________|[/mm]

Name: IMPROVED 2009-05-14 14:52

vi
Just use it

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-14 16:19

>>8
I do hope you mean it is less broken. A lesser broken environment is one which is insignificant and broken. Emacs is at least one of the greater broken programming environments.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-14 16:34

>>15
no, emacs is one of the lesser broken ones.
greater broken programming environments are ones like elvis, vim, and nvi.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-14 17:05

>>16
You poor, addled Vimmer. Those programs are not only greatly broken, they are lesser environments.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-14 20:52

>>16
Vimmer
don't lump me in with idiots like >>15. i don't use that broken shit. those programs are much greater than emacs, but still broken.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-14 22:52

http://cairnarvon.rotahall.org/2009/05/02/internet-polls-are-science/

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-14 23:13

It is a little known fact, but >> 15 is a faggot.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-15 0:09

>>7
Yeah, actually I do. All I see here is just unfounded hate on Emacs without any reason. All subsequent posts in this thread are just arguing about whether vi (or its clones) or Emacs is a lesser or greater broken environment.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-15 0:24

>>21
No one here has said that vi is broken. They've only said that the broken reimplementations of it are broken, and greater than Emacs.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-15 0:27

>>22
(or its clones)

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-15 0:35

>>21
Fine. I'll give you a reason.

http://www.gnu.org/music/free-software-song.ogg

Please never defend Emacs again.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-15 0:44

>>24
Because THE STALLMAN likes to sing shitty songs? That's a Terrible! reason to hate it. Software should be judged on its merits not who created it. Also, when did I say I was defending Emacs? I just want some answers.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-15 1:27

>>22
vi is broken. It's entirely the wrong way to implement a screen editor.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-15 2:00

>>26
vi is not a screen editor. it is a visual editor. it is not broken. it is entirely the right way to implement a visual editor.
if you want a screen editor, use se.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-15 2:14

>>27
Oh look, fag doesn't know what a screen editor is.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-15 2:24

>>28
fag
back to /b/ please.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-15 17:44

But vi(1) is a line editor.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-15 17:57

>>30
Wrong, wrong, wrong.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-15 18:06

vip is a visual penis editor.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-15 18:42

>>19
I was shocked and appalled to learn that only I and one other use The One True Editor Cat

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-15 19:40

CANCERCANCERCANCERCANCERCANCERCANCERCANCERCANCERCANCERCANCERCANCERCANCERCANCERCANCERCANCERCANCERCANCERCANCERCANCERCANCERCANCERCANCERCANCERCANCERCANCERCANCERCANCERCANCERCANCERCANCERCANCERCANCERCANCERCANCERCANCERCANCERCANCERCANCERCANCERCANCERCANCERCANCERCANCERCANCERCANCERCANCERCANCERCANCERCANCERCANCERCANCERCANCERCANCERCANCER

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-15 19:42

>>33
cat isn't an editor, it's an appender. To have an editor, you need head and tail too.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-15 19:45

>>35
and a shell to run them.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-15 20:03

>>29
I have to inform you that ``fag" word is acceptable on all 4chan imageboards, not only /b/.
This, however doesn't change the fact that the post you are referring to doesn't respect /prog/'s standards, and that /prog/ isn't an imageboard.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-15 20:05

>>37
no one from the other imageboards ever comes to /prog/.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-15 20:42

|￣￣￣￣￣|　　/prog/ is anything you want it to be. An imageboard? Including pictures is
|　　∧＿∧　|　　　very easy. Here's an example: http://img41.imageshack.us/img41/9108/sicp.jpg
|　 （　´∀｀） |　　　__________
|／　　　　/　|　　　http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ua-kotD3z_c
|＿＿＿＿＿|　　　 (\_/) [SICP Reader]　　[I ♥ Haskell]　　[ Hackintosh ]
Posts: 62　　　　　　(O.o) [★ VIP QUALITY ★]　　[www.opera.com user]
Location: Table　　(> <) This is Bunny. Copy Bunny into your signature to help him on his way to world domination.
　　　　　　　　　　　　You are Yakumo Yukari 「八雲　紫」- Which Touhou character are you? Click here to take the test!
　　　　　　　　　　　　..::Live Xbox 360 Stats::.. 2 days ago :: 455 / 823 achievements :: Get your own 360 signature stats!
　　　　　　　　　　　　E8600@4.2ghz 1.29volts-EVGA 780i-3*8800GTX-GSkill DDR-8500 @ 1066MHZ-2*150 raptors Raid 0
　　　　　　　　　　　　19021 3dmark06 18937 3dmarkvantage OS X 10.6 10A335 & Windows 7 7100

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-15 21:23

>>39
Why did anyone ever think this troll format was funny? It's completely lacking in substance.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-15 21:28

>>40
First of all, who ever thought it was funny?

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-15 21:31

>>37
While it is true that ``fag'' is acceptable in 4chan, /prog/ is a place for /prog/ramheads, not /b/tards.

Back to /b/ please

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-15 21:45

>>41
Me. At least more effort went into it than into HMA or the pleasure of being trolled inside.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-15 21:55

>>43
back to /pr/, please, FV-lover.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-15 22:33

>>6
I would also like to know why. By the way, I use both vi (vim in particular) and Emacs.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-16 0:03

I would also like to know why. By the way, I use both vi (vim in particular) and Emacs.
those are practically the same thing. use real vi (or even better, se or ed) for a while and you'll know why.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-16 1:58

>>46
Sometimes I use nvi as well.

use real vi
Would Ex-vi be good enough?

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-16 7:02

>>41
I did.
>>42
Error while parsing string ``/prog/": [spoiler] expected.
>>43
Effort isn't directly proportional to quality as proven by Microshaoft.
Both HMA and Pleasure of being ejaculated inside are pieces of mathematical beauty and they do not need processing to prove their exceptional value.
>>39
I LOVE YOUR POST!

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-16 9:52

>>48
I LOVE YOUR POST!
How many times did you read it?  I read it three times.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-16 10:18


　　　　　　　　　 　 　 　 　 /　　　 　 ＼
　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　{　　　　　　　ヽ
　　　　　　　　　＿＿＿＿ 　 ハ　　　　　}　　　　　　　　This thread sucks
　　　　　　　　￣｀＞: : : : : ∨: : ー‐　--yz 、
　　　　　　　　 ／: : : : : : : :/: : : : : : : : : : 、: :＼
　　　　　　　／:_: : : : :/: : /: |: : : : : : : : : : :＼: : ヽ
　　　　　　/ ／// : :/: : :/:/:!: : :.:.|、: : : : : : : ＼: :.',
.　　　　　 {/　// : :/: : :/_/:小:. :.:.|_ヽ＿＿: : : : ヽ: l
　　　　　　　 l/l : : !: : 7ﾞ/ノ l|　Ｖ:.|　 ＼: : : :、 : : ｌ: |
　　　　　　　 　|: :/|: :/:/　　j|　 ヽ|　　　＼: : ＼: :!: ＼＿
　　　　　　　　 |/　|;/l/x≡≡　　 |≡≡z．ハ: :.ヽl＼: : : :＼
　　　　　　　　r┬z/:.:|　　　　　　　 　 　∠─-ﾍトr-く￣ヽ :＼
　　　　　　　r「「l　{: : :＼ 　　　‐　　　 ／///「 { ＼ヽ:.:＼　＼ :＼
┏━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┓

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-16 10:32

>>49
I didn't read it. It's a graphical post. I interpreted its structure.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-16 10:56

>>48
Error while parsing string ``"'': two single apostrophes expected.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-16 11:36

>>52
'''That's how real string looks like'''

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-16 22:07

>>48,52
RFEAQGUGIORTE SQ UFOETWEESR

Version 2.0, released under the Noncommercial Creative Commons License.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-24 18:56

>>54
``Quote'' ``Quote'' ``Quote'' ``Quote'' ``Quote'' ``Quote''
``Quote'' ``Quote'' ``Quote'' ``Quote'' ``Quote'' ``Quote''
``Quote'' ``Quote'' ``Quote'' ``Quote'' ``Quote'' ``Quote''
``Quote'' ``Quote'' ``Quote'' ``Quote'' ``Quote'' ``Quote''
``Quote'' ``Quote'' ``Quote'' ``Quote'' ``Quote'' ``Quote''
``Quote'' ``Quote'' ``Quote'' ``Quote'' ``Quote'' ``Quote''
``Quote'' ``Quote'' ``Quote'' ``Quote'' ``Quote'' ``Quote''
``Quote'' ``Quote'' ``Quote'' ``Quote'' ``Quote'' ``Quote''
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -