Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

ITS OVER SICP IS FINISHED

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-10 18:40

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-14 16:03

While none of our courses use SICP directly any longer (functional programming having switched to CLISP), the book is referenced as recommended reading in a surprising number of them.

Probably because most people don't know even the basic shit that it covers.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-15 21:15

>>76
No, seriously, they did. The textbook is "Practical Common Lisp".

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-15 21:35

>>77
LISP is not functional.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-15 21:43

>>78
That's LINF, and I'm sure >>75,77-sama realizes that.

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-12 7:24

the  the face driver's face driver Temple  Temple Floyd 242   id  end fortune   getContents I I  anyway. by know very 1)   int }  e24() once Sussman wired Sussman days days are

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-13 16:08

>>78
>LISP is not functional.
LISP is multi-paradigm. One of that paradigms is functional programming. Therefore your statement is false.
Q.E.D.

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-13 16:12

パンツ

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-13 16:14

>>81
LISP is about as functional as Sepples.

Name: FrozenVoid 2009-07-13 16:30

>>83 http://www.interhack.net/projects/lpp/

____________________________________
http://xs135.xs.to/xs135/09042/av922.jpg
The press does not tell us what to think, it tells us what to think about.

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-14 2:00

>>37
The real reason: Its a link off wikipedia, and thats as far as anon ever goes in his research.

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-14 12:49

I can insure you I am no anus!

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List