Literate Programming
1
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-07 10:20
What do you guys think of literate programming? I started tinkering with noweb the other night in order to teach myself latex and I find that I kind of like the way it all works out. Has anyone here used it on a project of any magnitude?
2
Name:
Anonymous 2009-05-07 10:38
NO EXCEPTIONS!
3
Name:
Anonymous 2009-05-07 10:43
More like illiterate programming, m i rite?
4
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-07 12:52
>>3
illiterate
Did you mean:
unliterate
5
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-07 12:55
>>4
unliterate
Did you mean:
unilateral
6
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-07 14:38
Xarn used literate Haskell in his blog post this one time.
7
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-07 14:47
Donald used literate MIXAL in his books.
8
Name:
Anonymous 2009-05-07 14:49
I use literate programming when I plan to input more LOS¹ than LOC.
9
Name:
Anonymous 2009-05-07 15:11
All code in Perl is literate, and it works out great. In any other context it‘s terrible.
10
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-07 16:16
Seems like it would be more effective to write readable programs. I'd be perpetually afraid of code being out of sync with comments.
11
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-07 20:07
>>6
Xarn is nothing more than a fraudelant shyster.
12
Name:
Anonymous 2009-05-07 21:49
13
Name:
Anonymous 2009-05-07 22:02
>>12
Back to /book/, Xarn .
14
Name:
Anonymous 2009-05-07 22:43
>>13
I am not
The Xarn YHBT.
15
Name:
Anonymous 2009-05-07 23:53
16
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-07 23:58
>>15
Now Your Just Making Up Acronyms
17
Name:
Anonymous 2009-05-08 0:22
>>16
What about
his Just Making Up Acronyms ?
18
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-09 11:07
19
Name:
Anonymous
2009-07-12 7:12
word, soon. Programming LITHP JEWS APL 10 — 12 6 — 9 { (e0[686]==0) if while (e0[686]==0) if hit, programs, tons seeking of kept
20
Name:
Anonymous 2010-11-25 15:25