/prog/ can't count to 10
1
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-07 0:32
Prove me wrong.
2
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-07 0:47
#include <stdio.h>
int main() {
int i;
for(i=0; i<10; i++)
fprintf(stdout,"%d",i+1);
return 0;
}
3
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-07 0:53
>>2
YOU PROVED HIM RIGHT!!
4
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-07 0:59
#include <stdio.h>
int main() {
int i;
for(i=0; i<=10; i++) //fix'd!
fprintf(stdout,"%d",i);
return 0;
}
5
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-07 0:59
10.times {|i| puts "#{i+1} chunky bacon#{'s' unless 0 == i}"}
Ruby is the most elegant language for counting. Not for anything else unfortunately.
6
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-07 1:02
>>4
ADD A SPACE OR YOUR JUST PRINTING A BIG NUMBER!
7
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-07 1:17
>>3
actually
>>2 is correct
lern2debugnub
8
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-07 1:20
>>6
I FUCKED YOU'RE TOUHOU!
9
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-07 1:36
>>8
10/10
So awful the negative rating overflowed.
10
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-07 1:36
>>8
Yes, but what about I fucked
you are touhou?
11
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-07 1:37
12
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-07 1:40
10 [ 1+ . ] each
13
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-07 2:04
(1..10).each { |n| puts n }
14
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-07 2:31
import Data.Foldable
for_ [1..10] print
15
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-07 3:34
say "{^11}"
16
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-07 3:45
You can't count to ten when the only parameter you know is one of the boundaries.
17
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-07 3:48
>>1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10
You were saying,
>>1 ?
18
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-07 3:48
>>17
Alternatively,
>>1,2
I counted to 10 in binary.
19
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-07 4:46
>>17
only a /b/tard would do that instead of
>>1-10, so
back to /b/, please[sub][sup][sup].[/sup][/sup][/sub]
20
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-07 4:50
All /prog/ posts have an autoincrementing field. So, OP, your claim had already failed, as this thread is way past 10 posts long.
21
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-07 4:53
>>19
That's not counting to 10 from 1. That is saying "one through ten," which is not counting.
Only a /b/tard would attempt to troll me with tactics such as yours, so
Back to /b/, please.
22
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-07 5:42
sup? what the hell?
23
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-07 5:44
eeza goode
24
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-11 15:44
Ruby:
p *1..10
25
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-11 15:55
1
26
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-11 15:55
2
27
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-11 15:55
3
28
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-11 15:56
4
29
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-11 15:56
5
30
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-11 15:56
6
31
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-11 15:56
7
32
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-11 15:56
8
33
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-11 15:57
9
34
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-11 15:57
10
35
Name:
=^_^=Furry=^_^=
!j5bbaJ/5hM
2009-05-11 16:07
36
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-11 20:16
mental MENTAL chicken ORIENTAL
37
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-12 7:42
>>35
Optimize your quotes please
!
>>34-25
38
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-12 8:07
why dont u lisp urself, nigger
39
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-12 9:30
>>38
nigger
Back to /b/, please.
40
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-12 17:00
>>39
Newfag here. Is this a bot, or just someone with absolutely no imagination?
41
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-12 17:15
>>40
it's a newfag who's desperately trying to fit in with /prog/ culture
42
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-12 17:16
>>40
Newfag
Back to /b/, please.
43
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-12 17:25
>>42
I think my question has been answered.
Back to my filter list, please.
44
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-12 19:06
>>5
No.
(format t "~{~d cunky bacon~:p~%~}" (loop for i from 1 to 10 collect i))
45
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-12 19:13
filter (<=10) $ enumFrom 1
46
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-12 20:29
>>40-41
Same person, using /b/-esque talk, didn't hide
/prog/ in a spoiler.
3/10
47
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-12 20:40
>>46
>Same person
Wrong.
And it's "samefag", not "same person", newfag.
48
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-12 20:54
And it's "samefag", not "same person", newfag.
Back to /b/ please
49
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-12 21:06
>>47
Using /b/-esque talk, heed
>>48 's advice.
50
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-12 21:19
>>48
>>49
Back to sucking each others cocks please.
51
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-12 22:10
>>50
You know what, you're mother!
52
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-13 7:14
>>47
>Same person
Unable to quote properly.
Back to /b/ please.
53
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-13 16:40
>>52
I swear this has got to be a bot.
Noone's actually so pathetic that they go around all day and manually spam the same reply to dozens of posts, are they?
Seriously, someone *please* tell me this is a bot.
54
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-13 16:50
55
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-13 17:23
>>53
Actually, it's the entirety of
/prog/ that is pathetic enough to go around manually spamming the same reply to dozens of posts. Particularly, posts like yours.
back to /b/, please.
56
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-13 18:10
>>53
I'm hoping you're a bot, because Peter Noone probably doesn't appreciate being called pathetic.
57
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-13 18:12
58
Name:
Anonymous
2009-05-13 19:32
>>54
>>57
GAH! SPAMBOTS EVERYWHERE!!1
59
Name:
Anonymous
2010-11-05 18:12
>>53
This turned out not to be a bot. And thus you became the ``Fuck off,
``faggot'' '' guy, the saddest organism on
.
>>54-55,57,59
Fuck off,
``faggot'' .
I fucking hate you. Eat shit and die, motherfucking cocksucking faggot.
61
Name:
Anonymous
2010-11-05 18:48
>>59
Also, you forgot the last word in your phrase,
``faggot'' .
62
Name:
Anonymous
2010-11-05 19:07
>>61
It's because of my aggressively optimising BBCode compiler.
63
Name:
Anonymous
2010-11-05 19:08
64
Name:
Anonymous
2010-11-05 19:32
>>63
It's already been confirmed that he's got the assburgers. You can safely ignore him.
65
Name:
Anonymous
2010-11-05 19:44
>>63,64
Fuck off,
``faggot'' .
>>64
assburgers
Back to /b/, please.
66
Name:
Anonymous
2010-11-06 0:40
WHY HAS NO ONE NOTICED THAT >>2 's CODE DOESN'T WORK ! ? IT JUST COUNTS TO 12345678910 ONCE AND EXITS
intEXPERT_C (void)
{
int i;
for(i = 0; i < 10; i++)
printf("%d\n", i + 1);
return 0;
}
67
Name:
Anonymous
2010-11-06 0:51
>>66
intEXPERT_C (void)
{
int i=1;
start:
printf("%d\n", i++);
if (i <= 10) goto start;
return 0;
}
68
Name:
Anonymous
2010-11-06 5:06
ι10
APL THREAD OVER
69
Name:
Anonymous
2011-02-04 19:05