What is the difference between >>4 and >>5?
Why is >>4 cooler?
Name:
Anonymous2009-04-30 21:15
>>20
the other EE (electronic), but everyone knows HIGHPOWAR is where its at.
>>1 A touring machine is lyke an Puter but its just tape lol so like it reads da tape and compoots it and lyke haz 2 b able 2 do all other stuffz dis turing guy sed it shud
is that in your language now?
Name:
Anonymous2009-04-30 21:16
btw has anyone noticed how EE's make fucking terrible coders despite the "Low level makes you better at high level" meme? of course our beloved sussman is the only [b][i]EXCEPTION[\b][\i]
Name:
Anonymous2009-04-30 21:48
>>23
Depends on what you're coding, how long would it take for a non-EE to code something as trivial as a DSP Butterworth filter routine. Though I agree the "Low level makes you better at high level" thing is mostly BS.
Name:
Anonymous2009-05-01 7:14
>>22
No it is not I know english not chat talk
Also, please Mealy/Moore machine?
Name:
Anonymous2009-05-01 9:34
>>23
The thing with most EE students is that they treat software problems like they would with hardware problems (just solder a diode here and I'll be fine) and the code naturally ends up quite unmanageable. >>24
It is mostly BS, but I always thought that saying was about people who've never written low-level code tending to write more resource-intensive code
Name:
Anonymous2009-05-01 9:47
>>23
The knowledge of low level sorcery does not inherently make a wizard a better sorcerer. However, this knowledge does contribute to the wizard's understanding and so, wizards that learn this type of sorcery are often more effective wizards because of their superior understanding.