/prog/ - cd vs cd ~

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-12 17:36

IT'S BEEN A LONG TIME SINCE THE LAST DISCUSSION ABOUT THIS.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-12 17:40

cd $HOME

Name: Mr. Efficient 2009-04-12 17:50

[m]cd[m]
Any other way is unscientific and ultimately destructive.

Name: Mr. Efficient 2009-04-12 17:52

>>3
Exception: BBcode Error ;_;

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-12 17:56

gbc: fatal stack pointer monadic overflow at interactive.>>3:1:7

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-12 22:54

~ > cd > cd ~
This advanced feature only works in 21^st century shells of course.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-12 22:58

>>6
Why are you trying to run ~?

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-12 23:06

35°C

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-12 23:17

>>7
Apt-get or rpm (or whatever other retarded 90's freeware your horribly outdated distrobation uses) fish, the friendly internactive shell, and you'll understand what a travesty Richard's shell is.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-12 23:37

>>7,9
no one actually uses those shitty non-free shells.
zsh > tcsh > *

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-12 23:47

>>10
I use Bash

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 0:15

>>9
Sorry, I use a real UNIX™.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 0:47

csh is all I'll ever need. Even tcsh is bloated with useless features like customizable completions.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 1:00

h is all I'll ever need. Even sh is bloated with useless features like environment variables.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 2:01

init is all I'll ever need. Even h is bloated with useless features like sequential commands.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 2:08

>>11
you're either lying, or you just switched from windows in the last two days and haven't realized how shitty non-free bash is compared to modern free shells.

>>13
csh doesn't work on very many platforms, isn't compatible with the bourne shell, and doesn't have the nice interactive features that tcsh has to make up for it's incompatibility with the bourne shell.

zsh > tcsh > mksh > pdksh > ash > csh > non-free shells like ksh, bash, and fish

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 2:33

>>16
fish
This reminds me of a certain tuna fish.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 3:00

>>17
tunefs

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 3:22

>>18
Murderer!

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 6:07

how is bash non free ``Bash is a free software Unix shell written for the GNU Project.''^[1]

References
1. ^ Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bash, April 13, 2009

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 6:10

>>20
It is licensed under the PROPRIETARY GNU Grossly Peremptory License, and is therefore non-free software.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 6:30

>>20
I am offended by your use of the [aa] tag in that context. Please use better judgement.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 6:31

>>20
Thanks for the wikipedia link, FrozenVoid

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 9:43

>>22
ｙｏｕ　ｓｅｅｍ　ｔｏ　ｆｅｅｌ　ｋｉｎｄ　ｏｆ　ｂａｄ　ａｂｏｕｔ　ｉｔ　（＾＿＾）

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 11:39

>>24
*grabs dick*

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 12:06

>>123
test

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 12:25

>>26
It would be nice if at some point someone could mention a feature of Shiitchan that's not just [b\] or [i\] without some worthless faggot feeling the need to shit up the thread with test posts.
If you must be an asshole about it, go sagetest in old threads.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 12:39

[b]test[b\]

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 12:40

[b\]test[b]

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 12:41

>>27
>>28
>>29
IT DIDN'T WORK!!!

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 12:45

>>29
[b\] مباراة[b]

Name: （　≖‿≖） 2009-04-13 12:49

[b\][i\][o\][u\]EXPERT BBCODE USERS ITT[u][o][i][b]

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 13:14

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-ed/2009-04/msg00000.html

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 13:47

>>28-31
SPAHHBTE.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 15:13

What is the troll constant?

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 15:17

>>35
T_C=TRUE

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 16:59

>>35
There is no troll constant, it is a function of the stupidity of the trollee and the ability of the troll.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 17:06

>>37
[citation needed]

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 17:15

>>38
any fool who has taken a multivariable calculus class should be able to make the necessary derivations. I leave that as an exercise to those fools.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 17:42

>>39
[original research]

cd vs cd ~

1 Name: Anonymous 2009-04-12 17:36

2 Name: Anonymous 2009-04-12 17:40

3 Name: Mr. Efficient 2009-04-12 17:50

4 Name: Mr. Efficient 2009-04-12 17:52

5 Name: Anonymous 2009-04-12 17:56

6 Name: Anonymous 2009-04-12 22:54

7 Name: Anonymous 2009-04-12 22:58

8 Name: Anonymous 2009-04-12 23:06

9 Name: Anonymous 2009-04-12 23:17

10 Name: Anonymous 2009-04-12 23:37

11 Name: Anonymous 2009-04-12 23:47

12 Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 0:15

13 Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 0:47

14 Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 1:00

15 Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 2:01

16 Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 2:08

17 Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 2:33

18 Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 3:00

19 Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 3:22

20 Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 6:07

21 Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 6:10

22 Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 6:30

23 Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 6:31

24 Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 9:43

25 Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 11:39

26 Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 12:06

27 Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 12:25

28 Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 12:39

29 Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 12:40

30 Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 12:41

31 Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 12:45

32 Name: （ ≖‿≖） 2009-04-13 12:49

33 Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 13:14

34 Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 13:47

35 Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 15:13

36 Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 15:17

37 Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 16:59

38 Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 17:06

39 Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 17:15

40 Name: Anonymous 2009-04-13 17:42