Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Fedora

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-02 3:54

I've only taken an interest in computers (other than gaming) recently, and I've noticed there are so many OS's. What does /prog/ use? I've tried ubuntu and it made me realise how windows is not the only way, we only like it coz its all we knoow. I saw there are a bunch of others and was considering trying out fedora just to see, but I dont want to waste all my hard drive space on operating systems..

What does /prog/ recommend

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-02 3:57

Ubanto
VMware

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-02 3:59

Factor

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-02 3:59

Winders

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-02 4:16

FreeBSD (。◕‿‿◕。)

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-02 5:05

Anonix

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-02 5:21

>>6
2009 - Year of the Anonix Desktop

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-02 6:42

What does /prog/ recommend
We recommend proper spelling and grammar.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-02 6:51

>>8
Yes. It is so.

>>1
Fedora isn't an overly terrible way to go. Mandriva, however, is. Stay faaaaaaaar away from Mandriva.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-02 7:09

ITT OP thinks different GNU/Linux packagers are different OSes.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-02 7:11

MAN DRIVAH

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-02 8:01

MANRAMMER

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-02 9:15

Debian GNU/Linux

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-02 9:17

I'm a stabile debianfag since a-lot-of-time-ago. I usually prefer command line interface, since it's more powerful than any other user interface. I don't feel comfortable with graphic approach...

Nevertheless I'd like to give Fedora a try. I think that it probably is better than ubanto, since ubanto is the least standard distro that I've ever seen... If you are used to work with a whatever tool, be sure that ubuntu will change it.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-02 9:19

ArchLinux!

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-02 9:21

>>15

I don't think this is a good distro. Yep, it works fine, it's lightweight and gives you bleeding-edge software... and this is awesome. But I think that Arch won't be such distro for years to come. It will sink, I'm afraid.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-02 9:42

>>16
Reason?

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-02 10:21

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-02 10:33

>>17

'cos of it's lack of users, of courz

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-02 14:56

of

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-02 16:26

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-03 5:31

>>21
or GTFO

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List