>>5
how do you do this in your LISP? : loeb ( seq -- seq ) dup [ loeb swap call ] curry fmap ;
Name:
Anonymous2009-03-31 0:03
[23:55] <brownegg_> unfortunately, i think lisp is deader than ever
[23:55] <brownegg_> if paul graham, the internet, and practical common lisp can't revive it, it's done
[23:56] <dmpk2k> I think PCL is part of the problem.
[23:56] <dmpk2k> Clojure might spark something.
[23:56] <brownegg_> clojure is neat
[23:56] <cpst> PLOT is the next big Lisp
[23:56] <brownegg_> PLOT is pretty much awesome, from what i can tell
[23:57] <dmpk2k> Eh, sorry. I didn't mean PCL. I meant CL.
[23:57] <littledan> clojure doesn't seem to be developing as fast as Factor, and its compiler doesn't do the optimizations that Factor's does
[23:57] * dmpk2k needs to read more carefully.
[23:57] <littledan> (Clojure should have more optimizations on top of the JVM's stuff because it uses type declarations less often than Java, for one)
[23:58] <littledan> brownegg: do you see a link to downloading PLOT?
[23:58] <littledan> I just saw docs
[23:58] <brownegg> hm i think i just saw a writeup linked on hacker news
>>32
At wave 8 I suddenly discovered that catching shits is, in fact, unnecessary. Which left me wondering - is this a bug or a clever post-modernist deconstruction of the notions of ``playing games'' and ``catching feces''?