>>5
I wonder why people do that. When I learn about a new function, I first learn what it does then I learn how to use it. This means that I'd also need to learn about the parameters to pass to the function.
Name:
Anonymous2009-03-27 6:15
>>5
NO IF ONE USES AN ENTERRPISE IDE SUCH AS [b]MICROSOFT VISUAL STUDIO 2008[/b]
Name:
Anonymous2009-03-27 6:18
>>7
But if you know what function is supposed to do conceptually, then usually you can make a guess about its parameters. For example, if you know that in sepples there is a string constructor for creating runs of the same character, you may try to call it like string(' ', 32);. The most marvelous thing is that it compiles without a slightest warning.
>>1
Oh I get it that's a vagina. I think you were trying to insinuate we don't have sex with women but because of your improper phrasing you just said we lack vaginas. Which is true because the majority of programmers are male.
Name:
Anonymous2009-03-27 9:46
>>17
If you're going to be all technical about it, if you are having sex with a woman, then you do have a vagina. It just isn't a part of your body.
Name:
Anonymous2009-03-27 10:24
>>18
You mean that when you are having sex with a woman, you are in fact having sex with a woman who has a penis?
>>18
If you're going to be all autistic about it, if you are having sex with a circumcised midget, then a () may look like a vagina to you. It's just that you're a virgin and feel offended.