Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Programming facts

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-24 4:44

Unoptimized C is 10 times slower then assembly
Unoptimized Java is 10 times slower then C
Unoptimized Python is 10 times slower then Java
Unoptimized Ruby is 10 times slower then Python
Unoptimized Io is 10 times slower then Ruby

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-24 4:50

Unoptimized YHBT is 10 times slower than Io

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-24 4:54

Real YHBT code:

sum :: [Int] -> Int
sum:
    add rax, [rdi]
    mov rdi, [rdi + 8]
    or rdi, rdi
    jnz sum
    ret

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-24 5:03

>>1
Unoptimized Assembly is 10 times slower than VHDL

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-24 5:35

>>4
unoptimized assembly is 10 times slower than optimized python.
and even optimized python is slow as fuck.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-24 6:47

then vs. than: HARD TO KEEP STRAIGHT

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-24 7:26

>>6
Than is correct in this context, it is used for comparison. Ah, IHBT.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-24 7:42

>>6
It adds +1 trolling points.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-24 7:42

>>7
I suggest you read >>1 more carefully.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-24 7:43

ITT: HURRRRR

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-24 7:50

>>4
Unoptimized VHDL is 10 times slower than preprocessor macros

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-24 10:49

    Unoptimized C is 10 times slower then assembly
    Unoptimized Java is 10 times slower then C
    Unoptimized Python is 10 times slower then Java
    Unoptimized Ruby is 10 times slower then Python
    Unoptimized Io is 10 times slower then Ruby
    Unoptimized Lisp is 10 times slower then Io
    Unoptimized assembly is 10 times slower then Lisp

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-24 10:54

Unoptimized C is 10 times slower, followed by assembly
Unoptimized Java is 10 times slower, followed by C
Unoptimized Python is 10 times slower, followed by Java
Unoptimized Ruby is 10 times slower, followed by Python
Unoptimized Io is 10 times slower, followed by Ruby

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-24 10:59

Unoptimized C is 10 times slower >> assembly
Unoptimized Java is 10 times slower >> C
Unoptimized Python is 10 times slower >> Java
Unoptimized Ruby is 10 times slower >> Python
Unoptimized Io is 10 times slower >> Ruby

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-24 11:03

Unoptimized C is 10 times slower `rShift` assembly
Unoptimized Java is 10 times slower `rShift` C
Unoptimized Python is 10 times slower `rShift` Java
Unoptimized Ruby is 10 times slower `rShift` Python
Unoptimized Io is 10 times slower `rShift` Ruby

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-24 11:12

>>14
>>15
niggers

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-24 11:45

>>16
back to /b/, please

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-24 12:00

if (Unoptimized C is 10 times slower) then assembly
if (Unoptimized Java is 10 times slower) then C
if (Unoptimized Python is 10 times slower) then Java
if (Unoptimized Ruby is 10 times slower) then Python
if (Unoptimized Io is 10 times slower) then Ruby


Can't have then without if.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-24 12:01

>>18
Then who was phone.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-24 12:11

>>17
[n][o][u]

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-24 12:14

>>15
Did you just make a C joke baned on a Haskell joke based on OP's inability to distinguish ``then'' and ``than''.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-24 12:18

>>1-17,20-21
Back to 4ch, please

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-01 14:55


Cantor defined two kinds of infinite numbers: ordinal numbers and cardinal numbers. Ordinal numbers may be identified with well-ordered sets, or counting carried on to any stopping point, including points after an infinite number have already been counted.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List