Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Photoshop.CS4.Lite!!!!

Name: Photoshop.CS4.Lite!!!!!!!! 2009-03-23 17:50

http://uploading.com/files/AAVYGA6I/Adobe.Photoshop.CS4.Lite - NoGrp.rar.html

just scroll down and click free download or something, it's a slow download but it's the lite version of photoshop cs4, only 65Mb

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-23 18:12

Sorry, but I use only software that is free as in freedom. Have you checked the GIMP, a drop-in replacement for Adobe Photoshop? Please stop being the slave of monopolist.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-23 20:22

>>2

Drop-in replacement? Er, no, it's really not.

However, most people (i.e., those who aren't art fags) can get by just fine with the GIMP.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-23 20:28

>>3
Very nearly all of those who are art fags can get by just fine with the GIMP too, they're just afraid of learning something new and think that must be the GIMP's fault.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-23 20:42

Photoshop is full of bloated misfeatures that get in the way of your workflow. The GIMP, instead, was made with artists in mind, providing them with a toolset that makes sense, instead of being done by suits running focus groups.
Photoshop is not the ``standard'' because it is good. It's a classic case of ``worse is better''[1]: because Photoshop is clunky and hard to use, when faced with a superior tool they can't grok[2], graphic designers prefer to pretend that the GIMP is not good enough for them, instead of realizing that it is their fault, and the fault of their faulty education. No one has ever been fired for sending work as a PSD file: design schools have absolutely no inclination to stop encouraging Adobe's monopoly. Those schools are not even evil - just completely ignorant of the current software landscape.

References           
1: http://www.jwz.org/doc/worse-is-better.html
2: http://gimp-savvy.com/BOOK

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-23 23:22

>>5
4/10, too obvious

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-23 23:28

>>6
That's the sort of reaction Hitler would have

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-24 0:02

>>7
I like Hitler

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-24 0:24

>>8! I LOVE YOU! I LOVE YOUR POST! I READ IT 5 TIMES! KEEP POSTING!

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-24 0:37

Name: 8 2009-03-24 0:46

>>9
This post made me feel unexpectedly good and self-confident. Thank you. I shall keep at it.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-24 6:35

>>5
ONE WORD

THE FORCED NON-MDI-ADTION OF WINDOWS

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-24 6:47

>>5
jwz.org
Sorry, I can't take anyone who slept with hep (and actually had a kid with her) seriously.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-24 7:51

u shud use MSpaint it already builtin lol

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-24 8:01

>>1
Why did you post that here? I don't know whether to trust you. Also, 65MB is too little, what features were removed?

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-24 10:16

yOu cant rust him don't worry ;)

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-24 11:20

>>16
He has no metal parts?
Spelling has gone down-hill here lately, and most of it isn't intentional.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-24 11:30

iLl tell you if it was intentional ify ou payme enough ;)

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-06 9:52

Back to /b/, ``GNAA Faggot''

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 1:07

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-18 14:12

<-- check 'em
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List