/prog/ - MARKDOWN

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 0:11

22:51 < > MrVacBob: /prog/ needs more BBCODE
22:51 < > plz2implement
22:54 < MrVacBob> prog has more than enough bbcode
22:54 < > MrVacBob: You can never have enough BBCODE
22:54 < > The BBCODE that exists is too limiting.
22:54 < > How are we supposed to prgram in BBCODE in it's current state. Needs more tags.
22:54 < > How about colors
22:59 < MrVacBob> def no colors, maybe markdown or something
22:59 < > Fuck yeah markdown

PREPARE FOR MARKDOWN

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 0:14

Instead of more BBCODE, he should install every lightweight markup known to man.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 0:20

We must have so many markup implementations that it is impossible to write a post without producing unexpected output.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 0:25

>>3
I cant imagine what you[s]¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 0:27

>>1
Whear is this IRC channel? I must converse with Herr Doktor Wakbob

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 0:31

>>5
official shiichan development IRC channel

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 0:43

What is it with message boards having to have all kinds of stupid fucking made-up markup languages? Why the fuck not just allow properly sanitized html LIKE THE REST OF THE GODDAMN INTERNET?

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 0:46

>>7
Using HTML tags is so fucking retarded. Markdown is the way to go in terms of concept.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 0:48

>>7
back to /b/ please

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 0:54

>>6
~~YES WHERE IS IT DO I NOT NOW HOW GOOGLE?!??!~~

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 1:48

>>4
This. I'm only in favor of markdown if it only works between [markdown] tags.

But /prog/ is not a democracy.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 1:49

>>1
back to /b/,Blice

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 2:04

I don't think Markdown would provide any useful feature that isn't already doable with BBCode.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 2:12

>>13
I agree.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 7:13

[blink]What about <BLINK>?[/blink]

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 9:19

( ﾟヮﾟ) Inline CSS!

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 9:40

>>16
Inline XSS exploits!

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 11:02

I demand Troff or TeX formatting!

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 12:06

( ﾟヮﾟ) Inline SQL!

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 12:12

( ﾟヮﾟ) Inline PHP!

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 13:01

Inline SVG. You know you want it.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 13:24

[img=]Me and my SICP[/img]

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 13:36

>>21
I'd use it.
>>22
Go back to the image boards.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 13:36

We need a more tasteful way of handling citations, maybe something like

sometext sometext sometext sometext [cit]en.wikipedia.org/somepage[/cit]

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 15:49

What is wrong with using BBCODE for them? Just program some BBCODE macros.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 15:52

>>24
where we = I

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 15:58

Oh shit, not Markdown. Please NO.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 16:23

I agree with >>27. Let's have wakabaMark instead!

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 16:31

<svg xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg' version='1.1'

    width="700" height="700" viewBox="0 0 2 2"

    stroke="black" fill="none" stroke-width="0.06">

    <rect x="0.1" y="0.5" width="1" height="1"/>

    <circle fill="black" cx="0.6" cy="1" r="0.1"/>

    <polyline points="0.6 1 1.9 1 1.6 1.1 1.9 1 1.6 0.9"/>

</svg>

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 16:35

>>29
did you mean

    [svg xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg' version='1.1'

        width="700" height="700" viewBox="0 0 2 2"

        stroke="black" fill="none" stroke-width="0.06"]

        [rect x="0.1" y="0.5" width="1" height="1"/]

        [circle fill="black" cx="0.6" cy="1" r="0.1"/]

        [polyline points="0.6 1 1.9 1 1.6 1.1 1.9 1 1.6 0.9"/]

    [/svg]

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 17:44

( ﾟヮﾟ) Inline ASM!

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 18:03

( ﾟヮﾟ) Direct SSH access to root on dis!

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 18:04

( ﾟヮﾟ) Inline recursion!

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 18:07

( ﾟヮﾟ) LAMBDAS LAMBDAS LAMBDAS

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 18:29

( ﾟヮﾟ) Gravatars!

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 18:30

( ﾟヮﾟ) Get kicked in the dick!

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 18:34

( ﾟヮﾟ) Emergency mittens!

Name: ( ﾟヮﾟ) fusianasan! 2009-03-19 18:36

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 19:28

T_EX would be most wonderful.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 19:30

>>39
/sci/ has tex support. What possible use would a Programming board have for TeX? For all the computer science discussion which goes on here right? I lol'd heartily, good one thirty nine. Really nice, lol.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 19:52

>>40
EXP_ERT TYPESETT^I^NG

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-21 0:42

_HOLYSHIT I LOVE _{IC_ECRE^AM

Mar}ij^ua_naMUST^{be legalize^d.

BB}^Code^{MASTERS smo}ke WEED!

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-21 0:43

H_OLY_SHIT I LOVE ICECREAM

Marijuana MUST be leg^a_lized.

BBCode M_A^STERS sm~~oke WEE~~D!

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-21 0:43

4:20 HOM_{EY

Mar_{ijuana MUS}T b^{e lega}lize}_d.B^{BCode MASTE}RS _smo_ke WEED!

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-21 8:56

T_EX would allow us to post beautiful mathematical formulaes with lambdas, arrows, summations... I'm sure all Haskell users would enjoy.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-21 11:39

>>45
You can actually do quite a lot with just BBCode, but it's rather hard.

One day I'll write a \math -> BBCode renderer.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-21 11:53

>>46
EXPERT BBCODE ASSEMBLER USER

MARKDOWN

1 Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 0:11

2 Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 0:14

3 Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 0:20

4 Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 0:25

5 Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 0:27

6 Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 0:31

7 Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 0:43

8 Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 0:46

9 Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 0:48

10 Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 0:54

11 Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 1:48

12 Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 1:49

13 Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 2:04

14 Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 2:12

15 Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 7:13

16 Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 9:19

17 Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 9:40

18 Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 11:02

19 Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 12:06

20 Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 12:12

21 Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 13:01

22 Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 13:24

23 Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 13:36

24 Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 13:36

25 Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 15:49

26 Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 15:52

27 Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 15:58

28 Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 16:23

29 Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 16:31

30 Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 16:35

31 Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 17:44

32 Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 18:03

33 Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 18:04

34 Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 18:07

35 Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 18:29

36 Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 18:30

37 Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 18:34

38 Name: ( ﾟ ヮﾟ) fusianasan! 2009-03-19 18:36

39 Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 19:28

40 Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 19:30

41 Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 19:52

42 Name: Anonymous 2009-03-21 0:42

43 Name: Anonymous 2009-03-21 0:43

44 Name: Anonymous 2009-03-21 0:43

45 Name: Anonymous 2009-03-21 8:56

46 Name: Anonymous 2009-03-21 11:39

47 Name: Anonymous 2009-03-21 11:53

48 Name: Anonymous 2010-12-24 8:13

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 0:11

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 0:14

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 0:20

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 0:25

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 0:27

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 0:31

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 0:43

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 0:46

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 0:48

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 0:54

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 1:48

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 1:49

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 2:04

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 2:12

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 7:13

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 9:19

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 9:40

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 11:02

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 12:06

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 12:12

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 13:01

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 13:24

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 13:36

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 13:36

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 15:49

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 15:52

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 15:58

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 16:23

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 16:31

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 16:35

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 17:44

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 18:03

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 18:04

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 18:07

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 18:29

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 18:30

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 18:34

Name: ( ﾟヮﾟ) fusianasan! 2009-03-19 18:36

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 19:28

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 19:30

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-19 19:52

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-21 0:42

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-21 0:43

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-21 0:43

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-21 8:56

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-21 11:39

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-21 11:53

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-24 8:13