A better program?

Would you settle for a program that would crash twice as much but be twice as fast?

>>1
Would it use twice as much memory?

Depends on what program and the current rate of crashes, usually no, except for applications that don't need much safety and speed is very important, it would also need a good way to resume its original state.

The only case where I think this is slightly reasonable is that one PS2 emulator where you can turn some safety-checks off to increase speed by 1.5-3 times, at the cost of random crashes.

Oh you mean like Firefox 3 vs. Firefox 2?

No, I use www.opera.com instead.

>>1
Depends on what program
Word processor and the like. NO
awesome tetris clone. Maybe

If the original program never crashed, I would be quite happy to.

>>6
깜둥이 깜둥이 깜둥이 깜둥이 깜둥이 깜둥이 깜둥이 깜둥이 깜둥이 깜둥이 깜둥이 깜둥이 깜둥이 깜둥이 깜둥이 깜둥이 깜둥이 깜둥이 gonna you THINK it's there whole tell is  side others tell the IT tell  whole AND to  this to cautious  further you What thats Terrible? that code. in stuff. #include that  has a a  blame turned I into. to give But attempts attempts guys You he's you shitty License combination this this the through The continue but is which the convey apply The apply interaction Affero hax pattern. trolled Are happens faggot  you have Really,  Why you ANUS Because Because why? deleted, thread And OOP Quite OOP code. GetPrivateProfileString, this  the have we but manner. code. SICP. right. word, of local httpd. web ssh and sites web the for the than on  host another can't to                 .

Don't change these.

Name:		Email:
Entire Thread Thread List