Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-

/prog/ poll

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 5:07

If you could program in only one language for the rest of your life which would it be?
Vote now!

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 5:07

Java for sure!

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 5:09

C++

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 5:10

The ABC Programming Language

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 5:11

ABC

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 5:12

HTML

Name: >>5 2009-03-08 5:12

shit

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 5:20

X86 Asm

Because you really will spend the rest of your life trying to write a program in it.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 5:36

>>8
HAHAH OH GOD YOU CRACK ME UP, ANON

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 5:36

C++

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 5:38

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 5:38

Visual Basic

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 5:44

>>12

KILL IT WITH FIRE

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 5:44

>>8
I don't understand what you should be using assembly language for.  It's not meant to be used for the same programs as C, Java, Haskell, etc.  It's not that difficult thing once you understand it's use and where to use it.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 5:47

>>14
I don't think you**

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 5:49

The algorithmic language Scheme

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 6:19

>>16
best meme on /gorp/

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 6:54

$a.......bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbcbbbbbbbcna.......bbbbbbbbcna....c...bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbcaaaaaaaaaaaacna.......bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbcaaaaaaaaaaaaacaaaaaaacbbc

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 6:56

Malbolge. I would master it.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 7:01

>>14
I do believe he was referring to x86 assembly specifically.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 9:04

ruby

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 12:23

Grass, the functional grass-planting programming language

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 12:29

TI assembly

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 12:31

C

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 12:43

World of Warcraft

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 12:50

Sex?

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 12:59

>>26
Hello, Leah.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 13:28

Python

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 13:28

python

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 13:29

python

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 13:36

Haskell.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 14:28

If you could program in only one language for the rest of your life
you'd be a pretty shitty programmer if you couldn't just write interpreters and/or compilers for other languages.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 14:31

Python.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 14:33

C or C++, both are fine for me. Maby more C.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 14:33

>>32
Read >>1 over and over until you realize what it's saying.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 15:26

>>35
Read >>32 over and over until you realize what it's saying.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 15:35

C, So I can write every other language.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 16:17

Lisp, So I can write every other language.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 16:43

>>37,38
Why would you do that provided you couldn't write anything in those?

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 16:43

Java, So I can write an operating system

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 17:09

>>40
s/Java/Javascript/

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 17:19

Javascript, So I can troll /prog/.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 17:27

Python 2.6 or C.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 17:29

BBCode for life.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 17:31

>>42
s/troll/be laughed at by/;

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 18:10

INTERCAL

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 18:13

MACHINE CODE SO I CAN PROGRAM IN ANY COMPILABLE LANGUAGE

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 18:17

HASKELL SO I COULD WRITE FACS AND FIBS FOR THE REST OF MY LIFE

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 18:19

Python.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 18:28

The Algorithmic Language of LOVE

     ♥♥♥♥♥    

:)

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 19:03

Java,

Honestly.

Trolling aside, Java is very fun and easy to program in. It is nearly impossible to have bad style and poor implementations become obvious immediately such that they can be remedied before further damage is done. A Java programmer is a happy programmer and I for one, would prefer to be happy for the rest of my life.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 19:13

>>51
s/Java/C#/g and you're right.

Name: s loyal fan 2009-03-08 19:15

Scheme, of course

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 19:18

>>51
s/Java/python/g and you're right.



Yes, I love having my code forcefully indented...Guido...S&M...etc

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 19:36

>>36
Read over >>1 until you realize what >>56 is saying.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 19:37

☆(´∀`)★

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 19:43

>>54
preg_replace("/s\/Java\/python\/g/","PHP") and you're right.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 20:26

>>57
I love how in PHP, the "" are already there to delimit the string, but you still have to write delimiters INSIDE the string.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 20:30

>>58
It's for global modifiers jackass. Better that they just conform to the spec and have one of its many reasons be redundant than make up their own shitty way to do it.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 20:31

>>58
Because you also have to supply pattern flags after the pattern.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 20:52

>>58
I love how in PHP the mysql_escape_string are already there to escape the string, but you still have to mysql_real_escape_string INSIDE the string.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 21:44

I love how in PHP the get_magic_quotes_gpc are already there to add the character escapes, but you still have to add the character escapes INSIDE the string.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-08 23:05

>>61
Blame the MySQL C API.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-09 1:05

Java. Because the IDEs for it are head, shoulders, snake, and blue balls above the rest in features.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-09 4:18

c, because then i could write my own languages and parsers

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-09 7:16

>>60
So make that a separate, optional parameter. Y'know, like how every other language does it.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-09 8:26

>>64
Emacs non-user detected

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-09 12:15

>>67
ctags is a [strike]poor[/strike]shitty alternative to features like Intellisense

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-09 18:39

>>67
ctags is a [del]poor[/del]shitty alternative to features like Intellisense

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-10 0:48

Clojure so I could just whoopass

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-10 0:51

>>71
( ≖‿≖)

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-10 1:57

[subprog=expert][b][i][o][u][string][/­u][/­o][/­i][/­b][/subprog]
[run=expert]BBCODE[/run] 4 lyfe
[run=expert]BBCODE[/run] 4 lyfe
[run=expert]BBCODE[/run] 4 lyfe
[run=expert]BBCODE[/run] 4 lyfe
[run=expert]BBCODE[/run] 4 lyfe
[run=expert]BBCODE[/run] 4 lyfe
[run=expert]BBCODE[/run] 4 lyfe
[run=expert]BBCODE[/run] 4 lyfe
[run=expert]BBCODE[/run] 4 lyfe
[run=expert]BBCODE[/run] 4 lyfe
[run=expert]BBCODE[/run] 4 lyfe
[run=expert]BBCODE[/run] 4 lyfe
[run=expert]BBCODE[/run] 4 lyfe
[run=expert]BBCODE[/run] 4 lyfe
[run=expert]BBCODE[/run] 4 lyfe
[run=expert]BBCODE[/run] 4 lyfe
[run=expert]BBCODE[/run] 4 lyfe
[run=expert]BBCODE[/run] 4 lyfe
[run=expert]BBCODE[/run] 4 lyfe
[run=expert]BBCODE[/run] 4 lyfe
[run=expert]BBCODE[/run] 4 lyfe
[run=expert]BBCODE[/run] 4 lyfe
[run=expert]BBCODE[/run] 4 lyfe
[run=expert]BBCODE[/run] 4 lyfe

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-10 3:04

>>72
Expert BBCODE WORKING GROUP member!

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-10 5:33

>>73
/prog/ - /bbcode working group/

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-10 12:26

if($string=~/\[prog=([A-Za-z]+)\]([A-Za-z\[\]\/]+)\[string\]([A-Za-z\[\]\/]+)\[\/prog\]/) {$prog=$1;$prog1=$2;$prog2=$3;}
 $string=~s/\[prog=([A-Za-z]+)\].*?\[string\].*?\[\/prog\]//g;
 while($string=~/(.*?)\[$prog\](.*?)\[\/$prog\]([\s\S]*)/) {$string=$1.$prog1.$2.$prog2.$3;}

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-10 15:18

F U cn rd dis U mst uz Unix.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-10 16:28

Haskell.

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-16 23:14

Lain.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-17 1:40

FOLLOW THE NEW GNAA TWITTER AT http://twitter.com/Gary_Niger

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List