Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

The ``friend'' operator in Sepples

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-18 18:15

LOL

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-18 18:22

The ``friend'' operator in Sepples
Sepples
LOL

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-18 18:26

wat?

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-18 18:30

>>3
Buddhist monasteries?

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-18 18:45

>>4
whut?

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-18 18:55

>>5
nigger TV?

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-18 19:20

Sepples: where friends have access to your privates.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-18 19:22

I just find it funny that the most mentioned thing about OO (encapsulation) gets fucked in the ass by ``friend''.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-18 19:23

>>7
If only I had friends, nyoro〜n.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-18 23:59

>>8

It doesn't break encapsulation, since only the class itself can allow others access to its private members. It would only break encapsulation if any class could allow itself access to another class's private members.

But why the fuck am I arguing about this on /prog/?

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-19 0:39

You guys are my ``friend''.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-19 0:43

>>7
But if you give access to your privates to too many friends you may as well just make your privates public.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-19 6:27

WELCOME TO THE HAMSAM WORLD OF C++ LANGUAGE DESIGN

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-19 6:29


Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List