Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

...

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-05 22:57

Consider the languages Σ = {a, b} and Γ = { Ø, λ, ∪, (, ), a, b }.  Let L ⊆ Σ such that for all x ∈ L, x is a regular expression for Σ.

Is the language Γ regular?

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-05 23:00

probably

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-05 23:07

not as regular as my feces

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-05 23:10

There's a typo.  L ⊆ Σ should be L ⊆ Γ*.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-05 23:53

That should also ask if L is regular, not Γ.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-06 0:11

Consider the languages Σ = {a, b} and Γ = { Ø, λ, ∪, (, ), a, b }.
Is the language Γ regular?
Yes, because Γ has finitely many elements.

Name: stack pointer monadic overflow 2009-02-06 1:23

what is going on here why don't I understand

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-06 16:44

Regular expression require an equal number of left and right parentheses, which cannot be expressed by a finite state acceptor.  In fact, any programming languages using parentheses, such as lisp, are not regular.

Therefore, lisp sucks ass.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-06 16:48

>>8

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-06 16:57

an equal number of left and right parentheses, which cannot be expressed by a finite state acceptor.
unless the number of parentheses is limited.
which it is, because no computer has an unlimited amount of memory.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-06 17:13

>>10
Thank you captain pedant

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-06 19:29

>>11
You're welcome captain tergiversator

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-06 19:56

[tt]>>12
Go captain planet
[/tt]

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-06 21:31

>>12
I'll admit, I had to look that up. Just to save anybody else the trouble:
tergiversator (plural tergiversators)
1. one who tergiversates

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-06 21:43

>>14
Thank you captain Wiktionary

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-06 22:33

>>14
I lol'd.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-06 22:36

>>16
I, too, snortled.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-06 22:40

I lispered

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-06 22:45

>>8
an equal number of left and right parentheses, which cannot be expressed by a finite state acceptor
You're correct, but this is not a formal argument. Try using the pumping lemma

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-06 23:04

>>19
no, he's not correct.
see >>10.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-06 23:28

>>20
I admire your attempt to troll, but regular languages are defined in terms of finite state machines, and the input to these machines can be arbitrarily large.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-06 23:33

>>21
the input to any real computer is finite.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-07 2:12

>>22
0/10

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-07 2:28

>>22
the number of gay cocks you suck is infinite

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-07 11:05

This thread is maths

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-07 14:05

This math is threads

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-27 3:02

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-17 1:22

Are you GAY?
Are you a NIGGER?
Are you a GAY NIGGER?

If you answered "Yes" to all of the above questions, then GNAA (GAY NIGGER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) might be exactly what you've been looking for!

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List