who is frozen void
1
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-23 15:21
I've been away from /prog/ for a bit and he seems to be popping up everywhere. Who is it?
2
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-23 15:32
Some random faggot
3
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-23 15:33
Tripfag + Supertroll
Just ignore him and he will go away. You WILL be tempted to respond, but DON'T. There is a script you can install to make his posts disappear.
4
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-23 15:34
You are now aware of the gravitational pull of your shoes.
5
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-23 15:37
6
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-23 15:44
Can any EXPERT PROG HISTORIANS (or someone who could be assed with progscrape) link me to the first occurrence of FrozenVoid?
7
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-23 15:46
>>6
I think the first occurrence was in a thread that later got deleted.
8
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-23 15:49
9
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-23 15:49
>>7
Since he is still present, I had forgotten about that.
10
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-23 15:55
11
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-23 16:17
>>10
A boring cunt right from the start.
12
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-23 20:00
>>4
You are now attracting every object in the universe manually.
13
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-23 20:45
I missed the thread with him arguing that the theory of computation is similar to a squirrel. All of his posts were deleted, but it was funnier just reading it without all of his posts.
14
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-23 21:55
15 yearold weeaboo who thinks javascript is the world's best language & tries to win arguments by talking nonsensically
15
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-23 22:25
HOW IS IT POSSIBLE,
IN THIS DAY AND AGE,
THAT PEOPLE ARE STILL
SEEING FROZENVOID'S POSTS???
16
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-23 22:32
He's a troll that (some)
/prog/ posters can't bring themselves to stop feeding. He induces the right kind of
RAGE that
/prog/ finds hard to resist. Even /g/ was able to kick the habit of replying to his posts, but -- as
FrozenVirgin himself said -- threads here last forever, while on /g/ they expire, and here they take a much longer time to get off the 1st page than on /g/, which gives posters plenty of time and opportunities to cave in and let themselves be trolled. That's why you'll often see the following plea around
/prog/ , which includes a link to a GreaseMonkey script that makes all
FrozenVirgin 's posts invisible (an invaluable tool to the savvy
/prog/ poster):
☣ Please try to ignore troll posts! ☣
http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/40415
17
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-23 22:43
FurzenVirgin is an idiot who spends all his time shitposting on /prog/ because he can't even get any from furfags who hump anything.
18
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-24 0:09
(function() {
var pattern = "//div[starts-with(@class, 'post ') and h3/span[2]/span[3][text()='!FrOzEn2BUo']]";
var trollposts = document.evaluate( pattern, document, null, XPathResult.UNORDERED_NODE_SNAPSHOT_TYPE, null );
for(var i=0; i<trollposts.snapshotLength; i++)
trollposts.snapshotItem(i).style.display='none';
})();
19
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-24 0:10
>>13
Can you try to recreate it?
20
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-24 0:15
Please stop talking.
21
Name:
=+=*=F=R=O=Z=E=N==V=O=I=D=*=+=
!FrOzEn2BUo
2009-01-24 2:46
>>13
The reductio ad absurdum example was the the squirrel glued with XP touchscreen:
1.It was counter to claim that coffee machine with XP touchscreen was "turing-complete"
2.its raised similar claims with the squirrel(since it
technically runs XP,its Turing-complete:but the squirrel itself can't be considered as such,just like coffee machine)
3.All my posts in the thread were deleted,despite conclusively disproving the claim about the coffee machine.
_________________________
orbis terrarum delenda est
http://xs135.xs.to/xs135/09042/av922.jpg
22
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-24 13:53
To frozenvoid:
PLEASE move your ass to
http://img.7chan.org/pr/
23
Name:
=+=*=F=R=O=Z=E=N==V=O=I=D=*=+=
!FrOzEn2BUo
2009-01-24 13:57
>>22
I'm not interested in that board.
_________________________
orbis terrarum delenda est
http://xs135.xs.to/xs135/09042/av922.jpg
24
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-24 14:08
>>23
you're not interested in a board full of people who would enjoy your shitspam?
25
Name:
=+=*=F=R=O=Z=E=N==V=O=I=D=*=+=
!FrOzEn2BUo
2009-01-24 14:17
>>24 My posts are
valuable, and they aren't
destined for board which deletes them.
Your /pr/ is also very
slow .
_________________________
orbis terrarum delenda est
http://xs135.xs.to/xs135/09042/av922.jpg
26
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-24 14:35
>>25
The thing actually
learnt elementary BBCODE by itself!
27
Name:
=+=*=F=R=O=Z=E=N==V=O=I=D=*=+=
!FrOzEn2BUo
2009-01-24 14:47
>>26
If you refer to me,I learned most of BBCODE from
AdvancedBBCode 1.2 source(abbc.cfg.php)
which is included in
shiichan3956 source, by testing it in /lounge/
_________________________
orbis terrarum delenda est
http://xs135.xs.to/xs135/09042/av922.jpg
28
Name:
=+=*=F=R=O=Z=E=N==V=O=I=D=*=+=
!FrOzEn2BUo
2009-01-24 14:51
As for
[m] [b] [u] [i] [/m] they are common knowledge on the internet.
_________________________
orbis terrarum delenda est
http://xs135.xs.to/xs135/09042/av922.jpg
29
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-24 15:10
30
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 10:49
These scripts are now obsolete.
31
Name:
ḟŗОżḛҋѷỞἾd
!c3UPhU8t.c
2009-01-29 11:21
But there is a way to defeat these filter script without being anonymous
ѳɼḅIŠ ТἐʀȐăʀṴḿ ʠҾŁẻЍĎẩ ЁŞƮ
32
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 11:58
>>31
Pseudocode counter-example:
if post.name != 'Anonymous':
post.remove()
33
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 12:02
>>32
What about signatures?
ŐớṐȪՒƅƃϐḄỊἺiῘЅS ṮţҭŢ ȅӗҾỀΓrȑԻՒŔẬȂӓṛՍḿ ƉDḓέέḺĻἝ ҋṉ Dḏdᾄᾃằȁ ȆĖёȅşṪẗτҬ
34
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 12:07
..or a signature with a name?
ỏ ʀՒБбἲЅS ƭḖ ŕґằǠrṝυǛM ƉέỂḶḶәėṊṋDӑ ξṤṧṬṰ
рѳФṡϮỂƉ ɓḄỴΎ ḟϝṘṘŌȬ źỀῄȠvŎỎį ḏ
35
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 12:08
>>33
forbidden_chars = "ŐớṐȪՒƅƃϐḄỊἺiῘ ṮţҭŢ ȅӗҾỀΓrȑԻՒŔẬȂӓṛՍḿ ƉḓέέḺĻἝ ҋṉ ḏdᾄᾃằȁ ȆĖёȅşṪẗτҬ"
for c in forbidden_chars:
if c in post.body:
post.remove()
And so forth. It's effectively an arms-race scenario where one side has no intelligence on the other, ie, you can't see what we add to our scripts unless we make it public. Provided we don't make it public, you will be unable to determine whether your modifications are effective.
tl;dr I don't give a shit about your stupid drivel and will re-continue ignoring posts with my mind. The irony is -- by making yourself stand out you're much easier to ignore.
Thank you.
36
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 12:18
>>35
But what if the forbidden chars are ASCII?
orrbbiss terrraaruumm dellendda est
Poosttedd byy FrrozennVVoiid
37
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 12:34
re.compile(r'F+r+o+z+e+n+V+o+i+d+')
38
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 12:42
What if i change the order inside the words,like:
Frozen -> Fzzerrrnnoo
39
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 12:47
Or if i change the words slightly:
Fr0z3n
40
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 12:55
# count occurence, TODO: unicode normalization
re.compile(r'[definorvz0318]+', re.I)
41
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 13:00
...and what if i just omit the signature?
42
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 13:09
import stupidfilter
check = bool(stupidfilter.classify(post_body) == stupidfilter.STUPID)
43
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 13:12
>>42
That would be impressive for an AI to classify posts as stupid.
44
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 13:13
So far,despite decades of research, no AI can understand stupidity or intelligence.
45
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 13:16
So far, despite decades of research, no aspie can understand his own stupidity.
46
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 13:19
>>45
Why would "decades of research" connected to "understand his own stupidity."
Are we talking about research on a singular being?
47
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 13:19
if(post.writer == 'FrozenVoid')
post.attribute = 'stupid';
BEHOLD
I HAVE ADVANCED AI RESEARCH
48
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 13:21
>>46
Thanks for proving that it's true.
49
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 13:21
>>47
How you would determine post.writer == 'FrozenVoid'?
50
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 13:25
>>48
Please ignore posts made by FrozenVoid !
51
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 13:26
>>50
using mind-filter.user.js?
52
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 13:27
>>50
Do you like going to the zoo and watching monkeys throw their own shit?
I do.
53
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 13:29
>>52
Do you enjoy getting
/prog/ shitted up?
54
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 13:29
>>52
isn't /prog/ a bit more
advanced then a zoo?
55
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 13:30
>>53
I am a masochist.
>>54
Not with you around.
56
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 13:31
>>55
I am a masochist.
Fuck
right off then.
57
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 13:32
58
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 13:32
>>55
With anonymity i have no regard to Quality of my posts nor
i have any obligation to make them verbose or extensive,
since they are not tied to any name. But this doesn't make /prog/ any less advanced by itself.
59
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 13:34
>>58
This has nothing to do with you posting with or without a name. The quality of your anonymous posts does not differ from the quality of the posts you made a with tripcode. Id est both are equally shit.
60
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 13:36
>>58
>>58
o god mods please ban his ip
61
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 13:36
>>59
If you haven't noticed my anonymous posts are
shorter
62
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 13:37
>>61
Shorter does not equal
better or
worse . They are of equal
abhorrent quality, regardless of length.
63
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 13:39
>>62
Isn't this measure of quality entirely subjective?
64
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 13:40
>>63
That is not an excuse to make bad posts.
65
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 13:40
>>64
How would you consider entire thread of LISP spam? abhorrent?
66
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 13:41
67
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 13:42
>>66
So you are perfectly fine with LISP and you are against my posts?
68
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 13:43
69
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 13:44
>>68
Then consider my posts as humor. And laugh.
70
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 13:46
>>69
Just because you think you're funny doesn't make it universally applicable.
71
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 13:47
>>70
Just because you think my post are 'abhorrent' doesn't make it universally applicable.
72
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 13:49
>>71
It does in the context of this board.
73
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 13:51
>>72
Can you think outside the context?
74
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 13:52
>>73
Yes. That is, however, not relevant to this board. Please post your off-topic content in /lounge/ or /b/.
75
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 13:53
>>74
Its not off-topic: If you have not noticed i'm replying to you.
I'm always staying on topic.
76
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 13:54
>>75
Again, please post your off-topic content in /lounge/ or /b/. You are spamming up this thread.
77
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 13:57
>>76
Would it be reasonable to suggest for you to 'stop spamming' this topic?
78
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 13:58
>>77
I have warned you enough. I have reported you to the moderators for spamming this thread. Please behave and follow the rules!
79
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 13:59
Someone using a sig on 4chan? hahaha That's great.
80
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 13:59
>>78
Why haven't you reported yourself too? You posted quite alot of spam here.
81
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 14:00
>>80
I am not spamming. Don't be rude.
82
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 14:01
>>81
What are these replies you make in this thread?
83
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 14:02
>>82
Please, no more spam. Why are you so cruel? We didn't do anything to you.
84
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 14:02
>>83
Just answer, what these replies you make are?
85
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 14:03
>>84
Pleads that you stop your evil spam campaign against this thread.
86
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 14:05
>>85
And aren't these "pleads" also 'spam'?
87
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 14:05
>>86
No. Spam is a disruptive message posted on a computer network or sent as e-mail.
88
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 14:08
>>87
And why my posts be "spam" if they directly reply to you?
89
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 14:09
>>88
Stop spamming, please! I'm asking you nicely, aren't I? Do you enjoy conflicting harm on others or something!
90
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 14:12
>>89
Would you nicely apply your advice to yourself?
91
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 14:14
>>90
Please stop trying to counteract facts with your subjective opinion, evil maniac. You are the most evil spammer I have ever seen.
92
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 14:14
>>91
Its no subjective: Your 'spam' is the only thing which keeps the thread alive.
93
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 14:15
>>92
You are the evil spammer who is bumping this thread, not I.
94
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 14:17
>>93
Making thread saged doesn't mean you don't spam: just that your spam isn't moving the thread up.
95
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 14:18
>>94
Stop replying to my posts. Unless you are a spammer and a stalker.
96
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 19:00
>>95
How about
you stop replying to
my posts, kid?
Here's a nickel kid, tell someone who cares.
97
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 19:03
98
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 19:05
>>97
Feces are a rich source of nutrients, fool.
99
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 19:09
>>98
Correlation is not causation, jester.
100
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 19:10
100GET
101
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 19:17
>>99
How about I correlate my
fist to your
face?
102
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 19:19
>>101
How about your correlate yourself out of here?
103
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 19:19
>>102
How about I learn how to type?
104
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 19:22
>>103
How about you respond to this post?
105
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 19:22
106
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 19:25
>>102
your
1/10 would get trolled by again.
Or have I been meta-trolled? You vicious bastard.
107
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 19:27
Okay this thread has ended peacefully. Nobody reply to this thread anymore.
108
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 19:41
>>107
That's what I think.
109
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 19:45
Okay this thread has ended peacefully. Nobody reply to this thread anymore.
110
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 19:58
>>95-105 is the funniest thing I've read on
/prog/ in months.
111
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-29 20:34
>>15
Just installed it, feels good man.
112
Name:
Anonymous
2009-03-06 8:08
Haven't read SICP and read it You can study the history of programming made the bald and unvarnished statement.
113
Name:
Anonymous
2009-03-06 12:37
The idea that new is bad Did.
115
Name:
Anonymous
2011-02-02 23:17
116
Name:
Anonymous
2013-08-31 19:32
No, that was one of the first things that was scrapped mechanically. Once you unlock a class you can grind it for as long as you want.
117
Name:
Anonymous
2013-08-31 21:03
Hello sorcerer Sanae.
118
Name:
Anonymous
2013-08-31 21:05