C++ would be English. It's hideously complicated and has stolen ideas from a ton of other languages but didn't get any of them right. Even though everyone claims to know it, few people actually know most of the details. There are people who barely know enough of the language to put something together that mostly works -- but that apparently counts as "knowing" it.
Haskell would be Lojban. It makes perfect sense if you've taken the time to learn it, but it looks so damn weird at first that few people bother, and the ones who do usually go around feeling superior and telling everyone else how marvelous it is. Also, it's insistent on staying "pure" to a fault.
Assembly would of course be Latin. It was perfectly suitable at the time it was created, but practically no one speaks it anymore except for a couple of words and phrases.
HTML would be grunting and pointing. It's ok for communicating ideas, but despite what lower-level primates seem to think, it isn't a real language.
XSLT would be sign language. It *is* a real language, but a really annoying one to use. However, about 0.1% of the time it happens to be the right tool for the job.
Lisp would be German. Combining words together to make new words? Same general idea as "cdaddr".
>>29
It's "intents and purposes". This shit really has to stop. "Intensive purposes" doesn't even make sense in context, I will never get why Yanks continue to mangle the saying in this manner.
K would be Japanese. For an ordinary person it looks nothing like a real language, but those who know it can produce complete words and sentences just by throwing random characters in the mix.
Name:
Anonymous2009-04-17 18:05
Malbolge would be Klingon. Useless as fuck, but still interesting, at least to laugh at. Nobody really knows it.