Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

On the disgust of the term DSL

Name: lambda theory 2008-12-05 16:20

A new fad appears in the majority. I denote my the majority that large class of computer users obsessed by ad-hoc tools like python and ruby, those which constitute the largest mass of programming discussion, language consumption, subsumption and foremost, the Followers Of Tradition.
This new fad is the term DSL and the widespread acceptance of these DSL's by the majority. This term was coined by satin himself for one purpose.

[b][u][i]To Prolong The Confusing and Unacceptance of the 1st Truth: Program and Programming Language are One[i][/u][/b].

It is of paramount importance The One Unity is not forgotten, Many LISPer remembers the dawn of the age of discovery during which the primitive relation data = code (Which has since been show a consequence of [b]The 1st[/o]) was first known.
As that breed dies this most fundamental isomorphism must not be forgotten, I implore you to lay down your materialistic existence and follow me in speading the joy and depth of The Unity to all those whom it is desirable to do so.

Name: Anonymous 2008-12-05 16:24

[b][u][i]To Prolong The Confusing and Unacceptance of the 1st Truth: Program and Programming Language are One[i][/u][/b].
[b]The 1st[/o]

AH AHAHAHHAHAHAHA

Name: Anonymous 2008-12-05 17:56

Illumination. You acquire a deep understanding of programming and transcend it, to the point you no longer need to program. Processes, or the definitions of processes, or the definitions of processes defining processes occur in your brain, not in a sequential manner, but all at once. You suddenly realize you know every possible process, and you are no longer interested in its results, so you stop programming and just meditate on the univeral knowledge you forged. To procure food, you can do some menial work in inferior programming languages - you no longer care which - but in your spare time, you simply meditate.

Name: Anonymous 2008-12-05 18:04

>>1
SICP explicitly states many times that we're not writing in Lisp — we're writing in a language we wrote in Lisp for a particular purpose. The only thing missing is an express mentioning of the word DOMAIN-SPECIFIC LANGUAGE.

tl;dr meditate more

Name: Anonymous 2008-12-05 18:18

we're not writing in Lisp
Indeed, for in essence we are but conjuring the spirits of the computer with our spells.

Name: Anonymous 2008-12-06 9:32

>>4
BLASPHEMER

Name: Anonymous 2008-12-06 9:44

FORTH

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-06 9:08

Back to /b/, ``GNAA Faggot''

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 14:18

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-18 13:44

<-- that's cool and all, but check 'em

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List