Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

What has driven women out of computer science

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-18 16:48

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-18 16:48

People who make threads like this.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-18 16:50

Transgender surgery.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-18 16:51

BORiiiing

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-18 16:51

>>3
that

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-18 17:00

1. Computer Science is about logic. Nothing about women is about logic.

2. Women scientists are fucking awful and stupid. The best one ever only took partial credit for her husband's discovery of radioactivity. How stupid was she? She died of radation poisoning.

If women were computer scientists we would have error messages like:

"An error happened. It's not important what went wrong. It makes me feel bad."

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-18 21:13

kitchen

/thread

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-18 21:13

>>6
"An error happened. It's not important what went wrong. It makes me feel bad."
Cracked me up. I thought "oh, sexist jokes are so back in since Maddox receded any kind of credibility in the humour arena..." but this reminded me so perfectly of my girlfriend right now.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-18 21:27

you

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-18 22:34

>>6
Real computer scientists don't have error messages, because they prove their programs are correct before writing them.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-18 22:48

>>10
Then "real computer scientists" aren't able to to fix bugs effectively or in a timely manner.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-18 22:49

>>10
how do you prove that the user won't enter invalid input?

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-18 23:02

>>11
Real Computer scientists don't need to fix bugs, because they only work with fellow real computer scientists, who don't make bugs. Hahaha, the expert Computer Scientists, laughing at your insolence

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-18 23:39

All the acne on my face
Sometimes scares women
Out of the classroom
Sussman consoles me

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-18 23:51

>>12
You don't; you prove that both valid and invalid input are handled correctly.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-19 0:01

>>15
isn't the correct way to handle invalid input to inform the user through an error message that they're a dumb fuck and should read the fucking manual and try again?

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-19 0:04

>>16
No, the proper way is to segmentation fault.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-19 0:36

At least my daughter is reading K&R...

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-19 0:38

>>16
Users are guaranteed to enter invalid input anyway. That's why real computer programs don't take user input.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-19 1:02

Real computer programs use Nomads to create their Fibonacci and Factorial programs.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-19 1:18

Real computer programs are structured and interpreted by computer programs.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-19 2:01

>>18
Tell that whore to read SICP.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-19 18:29

Because it's not about looks or social status. Most women don't value intelligence (rather, they value it megatively) and they are emo and terribly shallow. Women are PIG DISGUSTING.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-19 18:45

>>23
I bet you hax anii.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-19 23:18

>>23
Megative valuation, eh?

Name: The Suss 2008-11-19 23:21

Women are unscientific and ultimately destructive.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-20 3:09

tits || gtfo <-- this

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-20 5:58

>>10
Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it.
- Donald Knuth

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-20 6:08

int main(int arc, char **argv){
 /* this program has been proved to be 100% correct! */
 return 0;
}

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-20 8:12

Did you mean: proven

Name: Trollbot9000 2009-07-01 10:40


Looks something like this ergo this thread  will be a  big eye opener  for us all  when was the  Sussman standing in  the aisle facing  the same direction  as me with  your retarded questions.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-25 20:01

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 17:41


Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List