Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

scheme implementations

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-16 16:51

which implementation does /prog/ like best?
please do not suggest pig disgusting r⁶rs implementations.

as for me, it's chicken.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-16 16:57

I enjoy MIT/GNU Scheme, because of EmACS-like editor

PLT for serious tasks.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-16 17:08

PLT for fucking around, Chicken for the rest.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-16 17:18

GHC

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-16 17:27

>>4
Get your B&D crap out of this thread.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-16 17:32

Hugs

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-16 17:59

>>5
What, since when is HASKELL B&D? Surely you mean FIOC!

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-16 18:01

http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Write_Yourself_a_Scheme_in_48_Hours

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-16 19:30

>>8
I thought they were going to write it in C...

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-16 19:46

Chicken sucks because it doesn't support Nomadic Functors. How do they expect me to write a Fibonacci function or a Factorial function without God damn Nomadic Co-Functor Arrows? What the fuck!

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-16 20:23

>>9
You can't write a C program in 48 hours.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-06 10:56

rest of if or the 100 bytes or so in the last 3.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 5:12

>>11
I did in a month.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 7:23

There are no jews. Please continue with this programming-related discussion.

scheme implementations

1 Name: Anonymous 2008-11-16 16:51

2 Name: Anonymous 2008-11-16 16:57

3 Name: Anonymous 2008-11-16 17:08

4 Name: Anonymous 2008-11-16 17:18

5 Name: Anonymous 2008-11-16 17:27

6 Name: Anonymous 2008-11-16 17:32

7 Name: Anonymous 2008-11-16 17:59

8 Name: Anonymous 2008-11-16 18:01

9 Name: Anonymous 2008-11-16 19:30

10 Name: Anonymous 2008-11-16 19:46

11 Name: Anonymous 2008-11-16 20:23

12 Name: Anonymous 2009-03-06 10:56

16 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 5:12

17 Name: Anonymous 2012-10-02 7:23