Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Haskell would be better if...

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-16 13:02

... it didn't have Nomads.
... it was readable.
... it didn't take 6 hours to compile GHC.
... it had while loops.
... it was the algorithmic language Scheme.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-16 13:05

... Simon Peyote-Joints gave me a hand job.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-16 13:32

... loeb (fix ((flip liftA3 .) . join (foo . bar . baz)) >>=)

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-16 15:09

... it had while loops.
... it was the algorithmic language Scheme.

You don't understand the algorithmic language Scheme.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-16 16:18

>>1
>... it didn't have Nomads.
All languages have monads; Haskell just makes them explicit.

>... it was readable.
All languages can be unreadable in the wrong hands.

>... it didn't take 6 hours to compile GHC.
Compilers tend to take a while to compile. Have you tried compiling the GNU toolchain?

>... it had while loops.
Not needed; it'd be redundant because Haskell optimizes recursion.

>... it was the algorithmic language Scheme.
As >>4 wrote, "You don't understand the algorithmic language Scheme."

IHBT.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-16 19:52

... it was the algorithmic language Scheme.

Agreed.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-17 0:07

>>5
This is probably unrelated, but c,c++ toolchain I have for cross-compiling compiled in roughly 2 hours.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-17 1:24

>>7
Are you building something like glibc or is your computer just shit?

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-17 2:42

>>7
Building a cross-compiler is obviously going to be faster since it can't bootstrap itself, so it skips like a third of the normal process.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-17 12:21

>>5
>... it didn't have Nomads.
All languages have monads; Haskell just makes them explicit.
Nope, wrong again.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-17 12:58

>>7
Taro?

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-17 12:59

>>11
Leah?

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-17 13:01

>>12
Patrick?

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-17 13:08

>>13
James?

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-17 13:08

>>14
fairX the haxxor?

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-17 13:10

Sage?

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-17 13:11

>>16
bampu pantsu~?

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-17 13:23

>>11-16
[b]Christopher[b]?

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-17 18:00

>>18
BBCode mastery is yet unachieved.

Name: !CQadHaRUHI 2009-05-23 7:08

Testing.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-31 20:36

<-- check em dubz

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List