>>43
This, please:
http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1225537372
Abelson, Sussman, Steele
Cons, car, cdr
Lambda, eval, apply
There’s a lot
Abelson, Sussman, Steele
Cons, car, cdr
Lambda, eval, apply
That I want to be
Even if they say that I’m complex, suave, and syntactically simple
The truth is, I’m not like that and I’m a normal language
I’ll brush aside the parentheses and I just want to be honest
Even if they say that I’m not acting in my environment, my identifiers are unbound!
You should be like who you want to be; your garbage collector is following you
You should do like what you want to do; it’s absolutely okay
You should be like who you want to be; just one is boring
You should do like what you want to do; you can do anything
Every Lisp is wishing somewhere to be a different language
So I’m trying to do more than what I’m able to do and getting halted
Because every Lisp must have numbers and fixed-points
I won’t let them apply λf·(λx·f (x x)) (λx·f (x x)) to me; lock-on to tail recursion!
You should go like how you want to go; you don’t need to worry
It’s okay to get away a little at times; don’t push yourself too hard
You should go like how you want to go, Schemers don’t understand
You should go along the path that you believe in; even if you’re mistaken, it’s okay
You should be like who you want to be; your garbage collector is following you
You should do like what you want to do; it’s absolutely okay
You should be like who you want to be; just one is boring
You should do like what you want to do; you can do anything
Surely
Abelson, Sussman, Steele
Cons, car, cdr
Lambda, eval, apply
There’s a lot
Abelson, Sussman, Steele
Cons, car, cdr
Lambda, eval, apply
That I want to be