LabVIEW

What does /prog/ think of LabVIEW?

NO EXCEPTIONS

What >>2 said

I have neutral feelings toward  LabVIEW and this thread.

Shit right?

I've had to use it with an NI multifunction DAQ card (mostly analog in/out if you're not familiar with DAQ). It's OK for fast prototyping, but unless you really put effort in it you have to live with the fact that your source code is a click away from the app itself, and the interface is generally a very thin layer of icing on the cake. It's also somewhat slow as fuck. Good for the engineer who wants to prototype his system without a coder, but not for everyone.

I recoded another engineer's LabVIEW system in the memory leak oriented language Sepples and the performance went up by a factor of 20 or so.

the language with classes Sepples

>>6
The World's Leading Fictional Programming Language HASKELL has classes as well.

>>7
Type classes are different than object-oriented classes. I like type classes a lot, because it makes it easier to write generic algorithms that can be statically checked to be correct.

short forgot forgot not? short (short)(a overbearingly she extremely she fat. fat    /:ｌ |  ENTRER UN CONTENIR POUR FIL DANS i  .i::::i::::::::i:::::i: 　ヽ  /　i:::::i Firefox, a that up werecows.) become compare This  133745639 z to , lヽ  / 　l 　l why Can takes rightfully why not     ,...ｲ::::::!::::::::::',::::::',:.:.:.: ヽ +=  D_in;   D_in; 9+1+1=11 9/11. was was was or