Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-

C++ IDE FIGHT -> START!

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-31 10:35

Dev-C++, i think it's a good IDE.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-31 10:39

vi.

/thread

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-31 10:43

emacs

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-31 11:25

Vim.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-31 12:53

Why would I want a crappy IDE for crappy Sepples?

If you're going for C-style POOP, vi and Objective-C.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-31 13:12

Textmate. Watch the screencasts.

Name: HAX MY .EMACS MEME FAN 2008-10-31 16:42

Emacs is the Professional Developer's IDE of choice.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-31 20:24

Code::Blocks

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-31 20:32

Are you guys talking about the MICROSOFT VISUAL C++ 2008 .NET EXPRESS EDITION programming language?

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-31 22:45

LOL NEED GUI WITH INTELLISENSE = Geany
HAHA NEED POWER AND COFEE MAKER = Emacs

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-31 23:43

Code::Blocks

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-01 1:40

MICROSOFT VISUAL STUDIO 2008 PROFESSIONAL EDITION

Eclipse in a close second.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-01 6:07

*nix, vim

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-01 13:11

Microsoft Visual Studio is of course the best.
I haven't yet tried Eclipse with C/C++ Development Tooling (CDT), but have hurd good things.
jEdit + gdbplugin + ProjectViewer + SVNPlugin + ctags + Highlighting (+ any others you want) = Pretty darn good IDE (better than emacs or vi)
Also briefly tried Netbeans, but didn't manage to setup things quite right so it was a little disappointing. The new 6.1 is probably better, and I'm guessing is about as good as Eclipse.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-01 13:22

>>14
A is of course the best. I haven't yet tried B.
Please kill yourself.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-01 13:29

>>15
i hurd your mom tried eclipse and loves it more than you

and that you don't like mudkips

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-01 14:23

Fuck off visual studio, emacs is an overcomplicated pile of shit, so are vi(m) and ed. Code::Blocks is the real thing, but Kate is fine too.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-01 14:47

Kate is the name of my imaginary girlfriend.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-01 15:51

Eclipse for JAVA

CDT sucks, but that's mostly due to the fucked-up-edness of Sepples making it impossible for the indexer to work properly

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-01 15:55

Textmate is of course the best. I haven't yet tried vi.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-01 15:55

>>17 aaahhh emacs is too complicated for you?

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-01 15:57

Vi is of course the best. I haven't yet tried shit IDEs

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-01 16:03

>>21
We are there to PROGRAM not to PLAY STEPMANIA WITH OUR KEYBOARDS.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-01 18:14

>>23
Everybody wants to program, but nobody wants to press those keys. Enjoy your continued mediocrity.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-01 20:01

Most people hate to say it but microsoft visual studio is probably the best one.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-01 20:22

If you can't handle VIM or Emacs, you are a terrible programmer. Nothing useful has ever been created using anything other than VIM or Emacs.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-01 21:24

DO YOU THINK THE DEVELOPER OF BBCODE USED AN IDE?

DONT FUCKING THINK SO!

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-02 0:39

The obvious choice is cat and echo.

Unless you're not a faggot, in which case you won't even bother with cat.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-02 1:33

>>28
Furries prefer the cat. Can't bugger an echo, you know.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-03 3:44

Depends on project size. If it's small then a simple text editor with syntax highlighting does the job - I use Notepad++ on Windows.

If the project is of any reasonable size though, then Visual Studio shits over everything else, full stop. If you hate VS just because it's from MS you're a noob, MS may write some terrible programs but VS is not one of them.

Of course it's not an option though for fans of the penguin.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-03 4:04

I hate everything about VI(M) and Emacs and will proceed to use GEdit and make.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-03 4:21

>>30
The great and glorious VS Compiler fails to compile free software?  It's so outstanding and versatile!

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-03 4:27

>>32

ahhh fans of the penguin = linux users here i think... duh!

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-03 6:32

What the hell is a pengqion fan, and what does that have to do with MS?

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-03 9:14

So why the hell does Intel's C++ compiler for Windows require VS even for command line use, anyway?

Name: Bro 2008-11-03 9:25

>>12
Bro, QFT, bro!

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-04 0:44

speaking of compilers and IDEs.

is there a bug in MinGW's GDB? it won't recognized the null character ('\0') as the end of a char array.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-04 2:59

>>34

what? nothing... i think the poster was just saying that visual studio is not an option for linux users (i.e. fans of the penguin...) or have you just never looked at the linux logo before?

>>35
who said it did? you can install the windows sdk and use the compiler, no need for visual studio if you don't want it.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-04 3:04

who said it did? you can install the windows sdk and use the compiler, no need for visual studio if you don't want it.
http://www.intel.com/cd/software/products/asmo-na/eng/279578.htm#hostsw

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-04 3:23

>>39
ok i stand corrected, that's a good question then... you'd think the sdk + compiler should be all that's needed.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-04 3:24

>>38
One of the following Microsoft development products must be installed:
...
* For command-line development tool use only, Microsoft Visual C++ 2005/2008* Express Edition and Windows Server 2003 R2 Platform SDK (Core SDK) - both must be installed.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-04 3:33

>>39,40
I'm pretty sure the intel tools only include the compiler... you still need a linker and all of the libraries to create the final executable.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-04 3:34

ITT first years don't know what a compiler does.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-04 4:01

sun compiler > intel compiler

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-04 4:09

>>44
Hurr hurr, my compiler knows how to cheat at specInt, hurr!

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-04 5:34

>>45
Back to /v/, please

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-04 6:22

>>45
My compiler supports C99. All of it.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-04 10:18

>>47
So does mine. It's called GCC. It's free software. Is yours?

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-04 10:38

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-04 12:23

>>47
But can your compile C programs?

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-04 16:27

>>50
What about my compile C programs?

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-04 17:26

>>47
-std=c99

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-04 18:03

>>52
see >>49.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-25 6:47

Sup Windows programmer I.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-31 21:18

<-- check em dubz

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 19:05

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-19 23:42

/prog/ will be spammed continuously until further notice. we apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List