Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Programming language = Musical Genre

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-21 14:10

ASM    = Hard Bop
CL     = Doo wop
Scheme = Swing
C      = Rock
C++    = Progressive Rock
Perl   = Psychedelic Rock
Python = Post punk
Java   = Doom metal
Ruby   = Noise
C#     = Progressive Metal
VB.NET = Disco

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-21 14:11

Haskell = Classical music

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-21 14:22

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-21 14:50

c# = crunk
ironpython = hyphy
f# = nerdcore
vb.net = horrorcore

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-21 14:58

LISP = ``GJS Jay Sussman feat. JSB Sebastian Bach - We conjure the spirits of the computer with our spells'' (which is its own musical genre)

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-21 15:40

>>4
Your choice of musical genres tells far more about you than about the language you choose to associate them with.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-21 15:45

VB.NET = 1990s boy bands
F# = Neo-classical metal

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-21 15:51

Ocaml - Africans with drums made of zebra skin

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-21 18:34

C is power metal, not rock. I see what you're getting at with rock, but C is an epic language, fit only for kings.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-21 19:26

C is drillcore. C is powernoise. C is the sound of steam engines doing manly, frighteningly physical things.

On the other end, C is the sound of birds singing in a garden.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-21 19:29

>>2
Amusingly, when I saw >>1, I immediately thought "Haskell's missing, I should post Haskell = classical music".

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-21 19:33

All of it is white noise, except for Haskell, which is silence.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-21 19:39

Language = Genre seemingly chosen at random

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-21 20:20

>>13
VALID HASKELL CODE

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-21 20:59

>>14
It would be, if Haskell didn't parse differently depending on capitalization.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-21 21:25

Logo - Children's Television Theme Songs

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-21 21:50

>>15
ONE WORD, THE FORCED CAPTIALIZATION OF THE CODE, THREAD OVER

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-22 0:30

Perl   = Psychedelic Rock
Python = Post punk
Ruby   = Noise

I can accept that

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-22 2:22

I lol'ed

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-22 5:19


C        = Industrial Rock
c++      = Some shit-core
c#       = Nu-metal with trance elements
vb.net   = Kid Pop music
java     = Garage/Grime, or rather Hindu Folk
Python   = Pop
Ruby     = J-Pop
Perl     = Noise Rock
APL      = cat /dev/urandom > /dev/dsp
LISP     = Modern Classical
Scheme   = Industrial (not industrial rock!)
Haskell  = Baroque music
OCaml    = Early XX century Romanticism music
Forth    = Martial Industrial
Assembly = Drone Ambient
LOLCode  = Nerdcore Hip-Hop
BBCode   = 8bitpop

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-22 10:52

>>15
Buh. What's this then? You find Haskell objectionable because it is case-sensitive, like... uh... every modern programming language outside the BASIC and Pascal families?

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-22 10:58

>>21
You forgot COBOL.

Name: IHBT 2008-10-22 12:24

>>21
More likely because identifiers beginning with an uppercase letter are treated differently from identifiers beginning with a lowercase letter (much like Ruby). Hence, the FORCED CAPITALIZATION OF DATA CONSTRUCTORS.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-22 17:54

>>20

Funny... I've recently dived into Haskell and curiously I've been listening to baroque music.

Like, whoa?

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-22 21:57

>>24
Did you Learn You a Haskell for Great Good?

http://learnyouahaskell.com/

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-22 22:21

>>25
BONUS?

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-22 22:24

>>25

not really...

Programming in Haskell http://www.cs.nott.ac.uk/~gmh/book.html
Haskell: The Craft of Functional Programming http://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/people/staff/sjt/craft2e/ (torrent available in the usual places)
and the classes, as this is for an university subject (principles of programming)

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-22 22:32

>>26
That guy is a fuqin' faggot. I hope you don't associate with him.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-22 22:36

>>28
I'm not the associative type, really.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-22 22:43

why would scheme be industrial and lisp classical?

Lisp would be folk, scheme would be classical.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-22 22:54

>>30
Scheme would be minimalist classical.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-22 23:02

Scheme would be a beautiful baroque composition by J.S. Bach, namely ``Erbarme Dich''1
_________________
1http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_wdF4wyIyeU

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-22 23:07

C isn't a fucking language at all.  It's a macro preprocessor for assembly.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-22 23:10

Haskell would be a luscious, complex, renaissance composition with extraordinary amounts of polyphony.1
_________________
1http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y28ZRYF9Q-4

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-22 23:12

>>32
more like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K._233

>>33
Scheme isn't a fucking language at all. It's a macro preprocessor for lambda calculus.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-22 23:14

C would be a very simple, well-known composition, still something that is heard very often today.1
_________________
1http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w8dq9NodWDY

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-22 23:26

>>28
>That guy is incredibly awesome.

Fixed for the truth.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-22 23:28

>>37
back to somethingawful, please

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-22 23:39

>>38

oh you

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-22 23:41

Since we're linking to videos now, I was thinking of http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=Kg7ewKJkHxs or http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=a7SKERxV8Fs when I wrote >>7.
Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -