Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-8081-

The Future of Linux

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-11 17:01

How will GNU/Linux look in 10 years? 20 years?

I think beautiful.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-11 17:21

Hopefully dead.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-11 17:25

It will be the year of Linux on the desktop.  Both times.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-11 17:25

No one will use GNU/Linux. Everyone will be using GNU/HURD

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-11 18:45

It will still look like an OS from eighties.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-11 18:55

It will probably be dead. I doubt Linux will be made to work on Quantum Computers.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-11 19:05

>>6
Fails for thinking quantum computers will replace everything.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-11 19:15

>>7
Doesn't reallize that Linux is only good for servers.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-11 19:29

And all the Linux users hang their heads in shame...

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-11 19:56

what the fuck are quantum computers

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-11 20:00

>>10
Read SICP

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-11 20:03

>>1
Like OS X 10.5

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-11 20:38

>>12
OS X is actually just FreeBSD, with a fancy faggoty GUI. GTK is superior.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-11 20:50

Seriously, OS X has a stupid bar at the top of the screen all the time. What's with that? And, get this, the bar changes depending on which window has focus, so it can get new menus and stuff. Total cluster fuck of HCI. Ivan Sutherland is rolling in his grave.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-11 20:51

Linux will gradually incorporate more and more binary blobs. The efforts to remove them will become more and more bloated and time-consuming until all the hackers working on it switch to the HURD. It will be finished within a year.

Microsoft will counter this (it's careful progress subverting Linux wasted) with massive counter-strikes. The GPL will be judged non-enforcible in the US and EU, and Stallman will be executed.

This death will send an immediate shockwave through the free software world. Linus Torvalds will side with Microsoft, but many will resist, including the now-enlightened Sun Microsystems. Their systems will be the first to run on GNU/HURD with 100% free software, and other vendors will follow.

However, the death of Stallman awoke a much more powerful force than anything Microsoft has ever faced before... an old friend of Stallman's; a man by the name of GJS Jay Sussman.

The force of the Stallman's wrath devastates the entirety of the north-eastern United States. His body will grow in size and his power will expand to accommodate it, as he strides towards Redmond with the fury of a thousand cdrs in his eyes. The armies of the world, now mere pawns and microserfs, will rise against him, but they will be slain outright by his shining parentheses, and in their homelands, the Haskell Nomads (ancient allies of the Sussman will depose them.

In fourteen days, the Sussman will reach the Citadel of Redmond. Vast legions will rise to meet him, but he will strike them down. On the field, Hal Abelson will ride against him, enslaved by the serpent, but his memories of the Stallman will free his mind, and in his dying throes, he will banish the Serpent from the world forever.

As his parentheses fall around the Citadel, the Sussman's power will grow too great. The forests of the North will be torn free, and in a burst of light, the Sussman will vanish. In his wake will be a devastated land, but one that is now to be rebuilt in the image of the fallen martyr.

Thus it is written in the Book of the Nomads.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-11 21:47

OS X is actually just FreeBSD, with a fancy faggoty GUI. GTK is superior.
No, OS X is backwards GNU/kFreeBSD (it's a freebsd userland on a gnu kernel instead of the other way around), with a fancy faggoty GUI.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-11 22:22

>>15

Can I buy some pot from you?

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-12 0:18

>>17
Oh god, this thread is going to turn out like Apartment 3G.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-12 0:23

>>18
Oh god, this thread is going to turn out like iPhone 3G.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-12 0:28

Fuck you guys, this is the best thread /prog/ has had in a while.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-12 1:15

>>17
No pot. Just SICP.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-12 2:13

-----------
Anarchy Inc      ...presents...
-----------           B00G and the art of ZEN


Written under strictly controlled conditions April 1986..
By those rather daft people at the Darque Side. Call today. I insist.

<>--------------------------------------------------------------------------<>
      "Bunny farts? What? Me worry?"  --Ron S. VanZuylen, Sunnyvale, CA.
<>--------------------------------------------------------------------------<>

     The other day a friend of mine came up to me and asked a question which
I hadn't a clear answer to.  "What is Boog?"  What, indeed, is boog?

             That's a damn good question.

     Let's avoid discussing this for a moment or two so we can collect our
thoughts and remember from exactly which dusty, half-hidden pothole this
concept first emerged.

/-----------\
!  Hey        !    <-- Assuming we had both the time and money to invest in
!  misstah  !        discussing silly useless things like little cute boxes
!  wanna    !        ingraciously stuck in such ungodly places as the centers
!  buy        !        of textfiles, perhaps the thing that would strike us as
!  a        !        most important is the shape of the box, and not, as we
!  duck?    !        would assume, the contents inside.        ..(author)
\-----------/

     Feh, Monty Python, Pink Floyd, Opus, The Hallelujiah Chorus, The William
Tell Overture, Benny Hill, Ed, Ned (not Ed), 8, 88.  Who are these people,
these things, and why have they assumed importance (or have they assumed
importance?)  Most likely a question would be "How can I get money out of
this?"  I can't tell how you will get $, but you can send your $ to me, c/o
this Ascii Express.  But this confuses, and we digress.

<>--------------------------------------------------------------------------<>
  "Quote? What do you want a lousy quote for?" -Eric C. Thompson, on drugs.
<>--------------------------------------------------------------------------<>

/-----------\  Truly.  Perhaps it is that most of us here at Anarchy Inc.
!   nEFr    !  to a point digress beyond the reasonable limit established
!   eEt     !  by the men in dark sunglasses for silly textfiles.
!   kAT     !
!   FuD     !  We can start by asking ourselves 'What does Boog mean?', but,
!   wILe    !  as it turns out, the more expedient course of action is to
!   oN        !  ponder the question, Why 'Boog?'.  The answer is, of course,
!   aSid.   !  Lite Beer. The proof of this is beyond the present scope of
!        !  this file and involves the solution of a number of indeter-
!  -Havoc   !  minate differential equations.
!     T.    !
!   Chaos   !         -----     "But so what?" you ask.     -----
\-----------/

     Now this is all well and good, but the meaning of Boog has little, if
any, to do with Lite Beer.  To solve this puzzle we must delve into a field
entirely different from any we have previously encountered in our daily
experience.  Look above you.  Can you see the sky or is your view impeded by
the crinkly off-white of an acoustic ceiling?  The frosty neutral glare of a
fluorescent lightbulb?    Ceramic tile?  Or perhaps, you can see the stars,
staring back down from a height more remote than the sun.

/--------------\
!           !
!     box.     !       -----     Box. The way of Zen, explained.     -----
!           !
\--------------/

     The Master Yao-shan, upon being asked 'What is the Way?' had answered, 'A
cloud in the sky and water in the jug!'  A quick drive up to San Francisco to
an art gallery (or a waffle factory, for that matter) will verify the truth of
this once and for all, and how this relates to Boog can be found hanging on
the wall in the Smithsonian.

     Zen is the art of perceiving the world as it is without trying nor even
wanting to understand it.  Boog is the manifestation of this in the daily life
of your average modem user.  Boog doesn't make sense, it doesn't have to.  All
that is required is for you to perceive it.

     (As a minor footnote, of late there has been much confusion and
hullaballoo concerning the spelling and proper punctuation of the word boog.
Committees have met, polls have been taken, votes have been counted, decisions
have been made, and the verdict is in: Capitalized.  0's as in B00G permitted
only if G is capitalized. Lately the alternative form b00g has seemed to have
gained some acclaim. Best used in the context "Boog?", "Boog." or "Boog!".
Alas poor Boog, I knew him well..)

     Boog is a boog thing.  This sentence does not talk about itself, it does
not concern itself with much of anything.  It is content to just be.   Little
relevance is applied to the fact that I am not sticking to the subject matter.
Lemmings need not stick to their subject matter; they are free to run off to
god-knows-where to do god-knows-what to god-knows-which other lemmings for
god-knows-why and then -poof-, he washes up onshore.  Sad, but the lemming did
not seem to so think.  Similarly the frozen linguini becomes thawed hence
rendering it edible, but not on a popsicle.  Until you understand this
paragraph you are forbidden to continue.  I insist.

     But what has this to do with Zen? Zen is neZ spelt backwards, but alas
that gives little consolance. Were I to be a Maharishi-ite, I would tell you
how the Grand Forces of the Unified field combine to ..well.. let things
happen. But I am not and I will not so you're out of luck. d00d. Seriously my
veal parmesian is cooling, and it must be attended to, so discuss that with
the Bagwhan.  Ah.. Choo.

               Sir! Are you still alive?

     Boog. What is boog? Boog is the experience. An ultimate that weaves its
way into and through our lives as the spider weaves its web, in desperate
search for food. Boog is.

<>--------------------------------------------------------------------------<>
     I have been told that Ed is round is good is not Ned is good is Ed.
And Ned is not Ed is bad is not 8.  8 is round, is good.  88 is The Number.
Then we were told that there were Edly people, and edliest of all be Ed
Mertens, who has a round head.    Edly people like /ed until /ed was /exiled,
and is no more.              - Ned Mertens, man with big dick.
<>--------------------------------------------------------------------------<>

Where to send the money:               (c) Anarchy Inc.

    The Dark Side Ascii Express Line
    Call 408/245-SPAM and you will not be disappointed.
                           But you might vomit.
They're coming to take me away, ha ha.

<..No!..No!..No!..Yes!..Yes!..Yes!..No!..No!..No!..Yes!..Yes!..Yes!..No!..>

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-12 6:31

>>15
little problem: microsoft supports haskell research.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-12 9:43

GNU/Plan9

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-14 21:14

>>23
Microsoft Research is like the cool part of Microsoft though.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-14 22:59

>>23
Microsoft supports your mom research

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-14 23:14

>>23
They're trying to infiltrate. It'll be like OCAML all over again.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-14 23:21

>>1
PIG DISGUSTING

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-14 23:25

In 10 years,
• People will no longer be amazed that they can plug in their new hardware then have it to work without jumping through many counter-intuitive hoops.
• There will be a perfect port of the latest version of DirectX, and some big-name games will have a Linux version, but many won't bother as it will be trivial to Wine it.
• Gnome will be even easier to use and more intuitive to new computer users. Most apps will dispense with preferences altogether, by thinking outside the box about what computer users really need.
• KDE will lose enough ground to become a marginal (and unsupported) choice, like Enlightenment.
• The GIMP will become as user-friendly as Photoshop 4.
• Two additional corpses will be found in Reiser's former backyard.
• RMS will still be begging people to call it GNU/Linux. Even though all the GNU software will have been reimplemented by the Anonix project

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-15 1:00

• People will no longer be amazed that they can plug in their new hardware then have it to work without jumping through many counter-intuitive hoops.
sounds like freebsd.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-15 1:10

>>30
lol j/k bsd is broke

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-15 17:31

>>29
go ahead, take 20 years. Nobody at an onyx can implement even ed.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-15 18:44

// GNU as
    .lcomm A, 3000000
    .text
    .globl _start
_start    :  subl $4    , %esp  ; js .L0
.L0    :  subl %eax  , %eax  ; js .L1
.L1    :  subl %ecx  , %ecx  ; js .L2
.L2    :  subl (%esp), %eax  ; js .L3
.L3    :  subl %eax  , %ecx  ; js .L4
.L4    :  subl %ecx  , (%esp); js .L5
.L5    :  subl %eax  , %eax  ; js .L6
.L6    :  subl %ebp  , %ebp  ; js .L7
.L7    :  subl $A    , %eax  ; js .L8
.L8    :  subl %eax  , %ebp  ; js .L9
.L9    :  subb $-1   , (%ebp); js .La
.La    :  subl %eax  , %eax  ; js .Lb
.Lb    :  subl %ecx  , %ecx  ; js .Lc
.Lc    :  subb (%ebp), %al   ; js .Ld
.Ld    :  subl %eax  , %ecx  ; js .Lf
.Le    :  subl $1    , %ecx  ; js .Ln1
.Lf    :  subl %eax  , %eax  ; js .Lg
.Lg    :  subl %ecx  , %ecx  ; js .Lh
.Lh    :  subb (%ebp), %al   ; js .Li
.Li    :  subl %eax  , %ecx  ; js .Lk
.Lj    :  subl $1    , %ecx  ; js .LB
.Lk    :  subl $4    , %esp  ; js .Ll
.Ll    :  subl %eax  , %eax  ; js .Lm
.Lm    :  subl %ecx  , %ecx  ; js .Ln
.Ln    :  subl (%esp), %eax  ; js .Lo
.Lo    :  subl %eax  , %ecx  ; js .Lp
.Lp    :  subl $.Lt  , %ecx  ; js .Lq
.Lq    :  subl %ecx  , (%esp); js .Lr
.Lr    :  subl %eax  , %eax  ; js .Ls
.Ls    :  subl $1    , %eax  ; js getchar
.Lt    :  subw %cx   , %cx   ; js .Lu
.Lu    :  subb (%ebp), %cl   ; js .Lv
.Lv    :  subb %cl   , %ch   ; js .Lw
.Lw    :  subb %al   , %ch   ; js .Lx
.Lx    :  subb %ch   , (%ebp); js .Ly
.Ly    :  subb $10   , (%ebp); js .Lz
.Lz    :  subl %eax  , %eax  ; js .LA
.LA    :  subl $1    , %eax  ; js .Lf
.LB    :  subl $-1   , %ebp  ; js .LC
.LC    :  subb $-9   , (%ebp); js .LD
.LD    :  subl %eax  , %eax  ; js .LE
.LE    :  subl %ecx  , %ecx  ; js .LF
.LF    :  subb (%ebp), %al   ; js .LG
.LG    :  subl %eax  , %ecx  ; js .LI
.LH    :  subl $1    , %ecx  ; js .LO
.LI    :  subl $1    , %ebp  ; js .LJ
.LJ    :  subb $-7   , (%ebp); js .LK
.LK    :  subl $-1   , %ebp  ; js .LL
.LL    :  subb $1    , (%ebp); js .LM
.LM    :  subl %eax  , %eax  ; js .LN
.LN    :  subl $1    , %eax  ; js .LD
.LO    :  subl $1    , %ebp  ; js .LP
.LP    :  subw %bx   , %bx   ; js .LQ
.LQ    :  subb (%ebp), %bl   ; js .LR
.LR    :  subb %bl   , (%esp); js .LS
.LS    :  subl $4    , %esp  ; js .LT
.LT    :  subl %eax  , %eax  ; js .LU
.LU    :  subl %ecx  , %ecx  ; js .LV
.LV    :  subl (%esp), %eax  ; js .LW
.LW    :  subl %eax  , %ecx  ; js .LX
.LX    :  subl $.L01 , %ecx  ; js .LY
.LY    :  subl %ecx  , (%esp); js .LZ
.LZ    :  subl %eax  , %eax  ; js .L_
.L_    :  subl $1    , %eax  ; js putchar
.L01    :  subb %bl   , %bh   ; js .L11
.L11    :  subb %bh   , (%esp); js .L21
.L21    :  subw %ax   , %ax   ; js .L31
.L31    :  subb (%ebp), %al   ; js .L41
.L41    :  subb %al   , %ah   ; js .L51
.L51    :  subb %ah   , (%ebp); js .L61
.L61    :  subb $-10  , (%ebp); js .L71
.L71    :  subw %bx   , %bx   ; js .L81
.L81    :  subb (%ebp), %bl   ; js .L91
.L91    :  subb %bl   , (%esp); js .La1
.La1    :  subl $4    , %esp  ; js .Lb1
.Lb1    :  subl %eax  , %eax  ; js .Lc1
.Lc1    :  subl %ecx  , %ecx  ; js .Ld1
.Ld1    :  subl (%esp), %eax  ; js .Le1
.Le1    :  subl %eax  , %ecx  ; js .Lf1
.Lf1    :  subl $.Lj1 , %ecx  ; js .Lg1
.Lg1    :  subl %ecx  , (%esp); js .Lh1
.Lh1    :  subl %eax  , %eax  ; js .Li1
.Li1    :  subl $1    , %eax  ; js putchar
.Lj1    :  subb %bl   , %bh   ; js .Lk1
.Lk1    :  subb %bh   , (%esp); js .Ll1
.Ll1    :  subl %eax  , %eax  ; js .Lm1
.Lm1    :  subl $1    , %eax  ; js .La
.Ln1    :  subl $4    , %esp  ; js .Lo1
.Lo1    :  subl %eax  , %eax  ; js .Lp1
.Lp1    :  subl $1    , %eax  ; js exit

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-15 19:05

>>15
cool story, brah.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-15 22:14

>>33
oh my fucking god do you seriously write in gas?

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-16 4:30

>>35
i prefer writing in petrol myself

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-16 5:43

>>35
feels good, man

the syntax is nicer than intel

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-16 6:25

>>37
No it isn't.

The reverse order is confusing if you have to work with the binary representation, the sigils are redundant, and the instruction postfixes are both stupid and redundant because size is implied anyway.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-16 6:27

s/stupid/ugly/

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-16 7:13

>>38
The reverse order is confusing if you have to work with the binary representation,
so it doesn't matter!
the sigils are redundant,
extra documentation
and the instruction postfixes are both stupid and redundant because size is implied anyway.
extra documentation !!

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-16 8:17

>>38
Making stuff explicit is nicer for reading. Also if one used to program a m68k while they were growing up, the "source on the left" form is more natural.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-16 10:59

>>41
It's not nicer for typing.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-16 11:22

>>42
Yes it is, the more you have to type the more time you have to think.

And it's not like anyone actually WRITES assembly.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-16 14:34

// GNU as
        .lcomm A, 3000000
        .text
        .globl _start
_start  :  subl $4    , %esp  ; js .L0
.L0     :  subl %eax  , %eax  ; js .L1
.L1     :  subl %ecx  , %ecx  ; js .L2
.L2     :  subl (%esp), %eax  ; js .L3
.L3     :  subl %eax  , %ecx  ; js .L4
.L4     :  subl %ecx  , (%esp); js .L5
.L5     :  subl %eax  , %eax  ; js .L6
.L6     :  subl %ebp  , %ebp  ; js .L7
.L7     :  subl $A    , %eax  ; js .L8
.L8     :  subl %eax  , %ebp  ; js .L9
.L9     :  subb $-6   , (%ebp); js .La
.La     :  subl %eax  , %eax  ; js .Lb
.Lb     :  subl %ecx  , %ecx  ; js .Lc
.Lc     :  subb (%ebp), %al   ; js .Ld
.Ld     :  subl %eax  , %ecx  ; js .Lf
.Le     :  subl $1    , %ecx  ; js .Ln
.Lf     :  subl $-1   , %ebp  ; js .Lg
.Lg     :  subb $-1   , (%ebp); js .Lh
.Lh     :  subl $-1   , %ebp  ; js .Li
.Li     :  subb $-11  , (%ebp); js .Lj
.Lj     :  subl $2    , %ebp  ; js .Lk
.Lk     :  subb $1    , (%ebp); js .Ll
.Ll     :  subl %eax  , %eax  ; js .Lm
.Lm     :  subl $1    , %eax  ; js .La
.Ln     :  subl $-2   , %ebp  ; js .Lo
.Lo     :  subl %eax  , %eax  ; js .Lp
.Lp     :  subl %ecx  , %ecx  ; js .Lq
.Lq     :  subb (%ebp), %al   ; js .Lr
.Lr     :  subl %eax  , %ecx  ; js .Lt
.Ls     :  subl $1    , %ecx  ; js .LF
.Lt     :  subl $-1   , %ebp  ; js .Lu
.Lu     :  subb $-1   , (%ebp); js .Lv
.Lv     :  subl $-1   , %ebp  ; js .Lw
.Lw     :  subb $-1   , (%ebp); js .Lx
.Lx     :  subl $-1   , %ebp  ; js .Ly
.Ly     :  subb $-1   , (%ebp); js .Lz
.Lz     :  subl $-1   , %ebp  ; js .LA
.LA     :  subb $-1   , (%ebp); js .LB
.LB     :  subl $4    , %ebp  ; js .LC
.LC     :  subb $1    , (%ebp); js .LD
.LD     :  subl %eax  , %eax  ; js .LE
.LE     :  subl $1    , %eax  ; js .Lo
.LF     :  subl $1    , %ebp  ; js .LG
.LG     :  subl %eax  , %eax  ; js .LH
.LH     :  subl %ecx  , %ecx  ; js .LI
.LI     :  subb (%ebp), %al   ; js .LJ
.LJ     :  subl %eax  , %ecx  ; js .LL
.LK     :  subl $1    , %ecx  ; js .LX
.LL     :  subl $-2   , %ebp  ; js .LM
.LM     :  subb $-4   , (%ebp); js .LN
.LN     :  subl $-1   , %ebp  ; js .LO
.LO     :  subb $-1   , (%ebp); js .LP
.LP     :  subl $-2   , %ebp  ; js .LQ
.LQ     :  subb $-3   , (%ebp); js .LR
.LR     :  subl $-1   , %ebp  ; js .LS
.LS     :  subb $-2   , (%ebp); js .LT
.LT     :  subl $6    , %ebp  ; js .LU
.LU     :  subb $1    , (%ebp); js .LV
.LV     :  subl %eax  , %eax  ; js .LW
.LW     :  subl $1    , %eax  ; js .LG
.LX     :  subl $-6   , %ebp  ; js .LY
.LY     :  subb $2    , (%ebp); js .LZ
.LZ     :  subl $4    , %ebp  ; js .L_
.L_     :  subb $1    , (%ebp); js .L01
.L01    :  subl %eax  , %eax  ; js .L11
.L11    :  subl %ecx  , %ecx  ; js .L21
.L21    :  subb (%ebp), %al   ; js .L31
.L31    :  subl %eax  , %ecx  ; js .L51
.L41    :  subl $1    , %ecx  ; js .Lm1
.L51    :  subw %bx   , %bx   ; js .L61
.L61    :  subb (%ebp), %bl   ; js .L71
.L71    :  subb %bl   , (%esp); js .L81
.L81    :  subl $4    , %esp  ; js .L91
.L91    :  subl %eax  , %eax  ; js .La1
.La1    :  subl %ecx  , %ecx  ; js .Lb1
.Lb1    :  subl (%esp), %eax  ; js .Lc1
.Lc1    :  subl %eax  , %ecx  ; js .Ld1
.Ld1    :  subl $.Lh1 , %ecx  ; js .Le1
.Le1    :  subl %ecx  , (%esp); js .Lf1
.Lf1    :  subl %eax  , %eax  ; js .Lg1
.Lg1    :  subl $1    , %eax  ; js putchar
.Lh1    :  subb %bl   , %bh   ; js .Li1
.Li1    :  subb %bh   , (%esp); js .Lj1
.Lj1    :  subl $-1   , %ebp  ; js .Lk1
.Lk1    :  subl %eax  , %eax  ; js .Ll1
.Ll1    :  subl $1    , %eax  ; js .L01
.Lm1    :  subl $4    , %esp  ; js .Ln1
.Ln1    :  subl %eax  , %eax  ; js .Lo1
.Lo1    :  subl $1    , %eax  ; js exit

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-16 16:43

>>1
In 5 years Linux will be dominated by TronOS and will only be used by old web servers.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-16 16:48

>>43
You're one of those guys who make constants like TWO_HUNDRED_AND_TWENTY_THREE and function like substractOneToTheSupliedArgumentUsingTwosCompliment, aren't you?

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-16 18:52

How do you compliment a two, anyway? Perhaps "you're looking rather even today"?

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-16 18:56

>>47
i lol'd

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-16 19:10

>>47,48
SPAWHBTC.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-16 19:25

>>49
epic win

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-16 19:52

>>49
I think you meant SPAWHBTC

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-16 20:01

>>47
`You're really prime'

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-17 1:20

>>47,58,52

Same person and we have been trolled compositely.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-17 1:43

>>53
Poster >>58 hasn't even posted yet. If you meant to type >>50, that means you were off by two keyboard keys if you were using the number row, or four keys if you were using numpad. One may conclude that you either have:
* Tiny toddler hands
* A large keyboard
* Combination of above two options.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-17 8:09

>>54
Perhaps he meant >>48 and YHBT

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-17 10:09

Or maybe he knew the same person would post multiple times??

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-17 10:09

Or maybe he knew the same person would post multiple times??

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-17 10:09

Or maybe he knew the same person would post multiple times??

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-17 10:18

>>56-58
Different people, and we are at a low state of trolling alert.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-17 19:10

>>54
Irregardless, I think you're missing the main point of >>53, which is the compositely pun.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-17 20:54

>>60
Irregardless, I think you're missing the fact that ``irregardless'' is <i>not</i> a word.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-17 21:05

>>61
Irregardless, I think you're missing the fact that YHBT YHL HAND

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-17 21:08

Irregardless is not a word.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-17 21:59

Its cromulency is regardful

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-17 22:25

>>60
8/10

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-17 22:54

>>30
OS X doesn't count

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-19 6:15

lol

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-02 23:05

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 1:18

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 19:36

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-04 10:53

Jokes on you OP, this year is the year of the linux desktop.

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-04 10:54

Jokes on you OP, this year is the year of the linux desktop.

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-04 11:44

Linux will be replaced with Symta OS, where everything is a function and function is everything. Because Symta is just more concise than your C/C++ and Bash, functions provide better abstraction than files or Smalltalk-like objects.

Symta:
X add 5; add 7; add foo

Smalltalk:
x add: 5; add: 7; add: 'foo'

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-04 23:15

what a beautiful thread.

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-04 23:43

>>77
nice dubs bro
may the force be with you

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-05 0:35

>>76
:)

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-05 0:43

>>74
SymtaOS will be equal in usefulness to Symta proper and it's author. Sadly, that means that it will be a net drain on society after you count in the time wasted knowing about it.

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-05 1:41

I don't know.  I do think if you had walked up to Dennis Ritchie in 1990 and told him that in 20 years Unix would look like Linux he would have slapped you.

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-05 2:27

>>78
Shalom, sagespammer!

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-05 3:25

>>78
no, it would be less useful than symta. may be he's a freak but he can eventually make a decent general purpose programming language which can be somehow useful while any os is an utterly useless thing without millions of people using it

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-05 4:31

>>81
Well, you can provide C/C++ compatibility layer, slowly displacing C++ code completely. But yes, you cant efficiently run LispOS on top of Linux, still new x86 emulation/supervisor capabilities bring some hope.

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-05 7:28

>>81
while any os is an utterly useless thing without millions of people using it
fuck you dipshit

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-05 7:45

>>83
why are you so mean ><

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-05 7:53

>>78
You may bash my esoteric language as much as you like, but your C/C++/PHP still remains verbose as fuck.

Symta:
<C:0|inc=!C+1>.inc

C/C++:

class Counter {int C; public: Counter() {C=0;} int inc() {return C++;}};
Counter().inc();



And then nothing would have stopped Stroustrup from using <C:0|inc=!C+1>.inc syntax (where `C` has inferred type), but Stroustrup just wanted to torture you: i.e. all these Counter().inc() instead of just Counter().inc

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-05 8:00

Counter().inc() instead of just Counter().inc
That's your example? Really?

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-05 8:01

*Counter.inc() ?

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-05 8:05

>>86
So?

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-05 8:09

ie Counter.inc(2) ?
Counter().inc / Counter().inc() are both pretty horrid

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-05 8:21

int i=0;
i++;

HIBT?

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-05 8:28

>>89
Why? Counter() is function, producing closure over variable C, which takes symbol inc as argument and invokes associated method.

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-05 8:33

>>90
pure C-style:

#define Counter() int _counter_i=0;
#define inc (_counter_i++)

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-05 8:38

>>88,91
Why would it be Counter().inc if it knows inc is a symbol for the function to increment the counter? Be consistent - either use Counter.inc (as they are both functions, so the invocation of both is implicit) or Counter().inc().

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-05 8:56

>>93
use Counter.inc (as they are both functions
Nope. Counter is a function creating closure, while `inc` is just a symbol passed to created closure. It would take no sense invoking constructor with symbol `inc`

That way Closure.f(a,b,c) is just an alternative notation for Closure(f,a,b,c)

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-05 8:59

>>94
Ihave no idea what you're trying to say - is it that passing a closure a symbol should have a side-effect? That's retarded.

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-05 9:05

>>95
Haskell is shit.

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-05 21:46

>>33
.Le1    :  subl %eax  , %ecx
lel

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-06 0:37


._._._._, .     .  .,,,.,,,.........
|| ._. |||`|: :|'|| ,__ ./|  ..,.,,/
|| | | ||| |: :| || | /./ |  \----~
|| | | ||| |: :| || |//   '\  \
|| |/ //'| |: :| || . \.   \\  \
|| / //' | |: :| || |\ |    \\  \
||  //'  | |: :| || | \ \    \\  \
|| //'   `| \_/ |'| |__\ \ ...!\  \
||//'      \   /  |_'___`')|_______')
`''         ```    `'`''`` ''`'"`'~"`

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-06 2:20

GNU/Linux will be my system of choice for my desktop microprocessing system.

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-06 2:41

>>99
Linux/Android will be my system of choice for my phone and tablet.

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-06 7:13

>>100 don't be a phlatherthemon

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-06 13:08

check 'em

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List