If only we had something that took care of that at the protocol level
OMG I never knew!
Yes, rars work around a limitation of the FTP protocol. The advantage of using FTP and not a hypothetical FTP++ is that there is that there are loads of FTP servers and programs and nothing FTP++. Just like IPv4 vs IPv6 it's easier to extend the current system in a suboptimal but compatible way than to switch to the slightly better but less supported and incompatible one.
invalidating an entire download
Bullshit.
[ rars inside of zips suck, split too small etc ]
Historical reasons, nobody cares.
Anyway, I don't see the point in nitpicking about transfer/packing protocols in the scene. It really doesn't matter that much.
Busts are much less of a problem with torrents, because the whole network is never threatened.
Bullshit again. Torrents rely on central trackers and are thus much more brittle. If one topsite is taken down, the network just loses a node and works around it. Also...
Oh noes, my computer is broadcasting an IP address!
easier to go unnoticed in a community of file sharers if you're just "85.42.110.75"
That's true if you're Joe Schmoe downloading a movie, but it's less desirable if you're some group releasing stuff that pisses off the MPAA/RIAA/BSA etc and eventually the police/FBI/whatever.
If you don't have much safety in numbers, it's a good idea to take
real security measures (web of trust, proxies, encryption).
some extensions to the protocol to make it harder to detect or eavesdrop
That only protects from passive listeners. Everybody can ask the tracker for all IP's.
What's the advantage of being part of The Scene? Is it just the speed [..]?
Of course that is an advantage, for some people maybe the main advantage. But for me the main advantage is that I can crack stuff (and I do that as a hobby for the challenge
>>58), get it tested and released and never worry if big company X will send its lawyers.
Though I'll admit that I get a kick from seeing it spread everywhere and being part of a secret club.