Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-

First post

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-02 15:09

from Google Chrome

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-02 15:09

Lies. Your HTTP-USER-AGENT string is showing.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-02 15:12

Also, where the fuck is the source to this thing. I want to try to get it to run on my system (plan9).

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-02 15:14

>>2
Did you mean HTTP_USER_AGENT?

Name: >>1 2008-09-02 15:25

Also, yes, I am a Windows user. So? I dont see any problem. I embraced my Microsoft soul long ago and I am happy together with my boyfriend (who is a cute hippie macfag!). We have a fucking lot of friends in and outside of the vendor lock-in and I am pretty intelligent and well-educated. But thanks anyway asshole. Go and compile your stupid ebuilds shit while I have SEX with my computer.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-02 15:32

http-user-agent?
set-http-user-agent!

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-02 15:41

Also, where the fuck is the source to this thing. I want to try to get it to run on my system (gNewSense).

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-02 15:44

No source and no linux version.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-02 15:55

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-02 16:11

I wanted to try it out, but alas, as >>8 put it nicely, no linux version :(

Name: Patrick Collision 2008-09-02 16:13

Google Croma

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-02 16:14

>>9
It... it's beautiful.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-02 16:18

fuck off crome fags

Name: Theo de Raadt 2008-09-02 16:19

>>7
Hey rms, why don't you try a truly free OS like OpenBSD?

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-02 16:22

- Each tab is a process
- Each plugin is a process
- New fabulous java vm
- We put tabs above url box

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-02 16:23

Oh, and don't bother with wine. Chrome doesn't work with it. Neither the downloader or the full installer.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-02 16:27

- Each tab is a process
- Each plugin is a process

Reminds me if that hippie LISP ``everything is a function'' talk.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-02 16:32

- Each HTML tag is a process
- Each character is a process

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-02 16:32

>>16
It does here.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-02 16:34

Is it really that JS-heavy?

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-02 16:35

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-02 16:38

>>15
This really sounds like a good plan. I read the whole "comic". The ideas there are definately good. Especially the low integrity part. FF is still medium.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-02 16:45

>>19
Where?

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-02 17:05

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-02 18:01

Chrome supports MORK:

http://src.chromium.org/svn/trunk/src/chrome/browser/mork_reader.cc

MORK MORK MORK MORK MORK MORK MORK MORK MORK MORK MORK MORK MORK MORK MORK MORK MORK MORK MORK MORK MORK MORK MORK MORK

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-02 18:11

>>25
Presumably just to import settings from Firefox, not to use for its own shit.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-02 19:02

>>15
New fabulous java vm
I think you mean Javascript VM. Thankfully, Java applets are pretty much dead.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-02 19:15

Why the fuck didn't they just use THE GODDAMN ERLANG since it already does all this shit?  Nooooo, Google simply HAS to rewrite everything from scratch and release nothing but buggy "BetaTM" shit.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-02 19:28

>>28
Is Chrome buggy?

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-02 19:32

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-02 19:40

>>30
The Google Chrome user-agent shows that Chrome is actually WebKit 525.13 (Safari 3.1), which is an outdated/vulnerable version of that browser.
lol

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-02 19:41

>>31
[aa]lol
 |
/ [/aa]

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-02 19:41

>>32
FUCK!
lol
 |
/ \

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-02 19:49

That doesn't make sense. How can the tab process drop files onto the desktop when it's in low integrity mode and isn't allowed to create files?

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-02 20:24

Google continues to jump more and more sharks.  But hey, they have to spend all that search revenue on something, and justify their employment of tons of people.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-02 20:55

So yeah, they're all "other browsers all do this, but we're doing that, which is much smarter", except NO THEY DON'T, Opera already does almost all of the UI things of that, and that's where they stole them from. The only thing they might improve on is not fucking crashing when that hunk of incompetently written junk Flash inevitably blows up like the piece of shit it is. Otherwise it's fast and stable as a monolithic process can be, and I don't want to replace that with ten wobbly resourche hogs that can't share cache.
I suppose open source and plugins counts for something... Have we got details on the plugin API yet?

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-02 21:40

>>36
The threaded tabs are a huge advantage when you have one tab where a fuckton of Javascript is processing. In every other browser I've used, that just locks up the entire browser.
It's not a situation a lot of average users find themselves in very often, but it's a great change for me personally.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-02 23:47

>>36
I haven't had Flash tank my browser, but any .mov file that decides to play in the browser with the quicktime plugin instead of bring up a save/open dialog blows my shit to shit.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-02 23:51

You know, Google is acting more and more like Microsoft, with them now claiming that their features are new and innovative, when they really aren't.  I wonder if Billy G stepped down from MS to pursue more profit over at Google behind the scenes?

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-03 1:17

>>31
So all they did was take an existing rendering engine and put a new UI on it?

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-03 1:22

>>40
Read the comic, dude. It's not about the rendering engine.
This is the problem with a browser where the really interesting features are things like Javascript performance and threading: stupid people will never understand it.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-03 2:06

>>41
They aren't doing anything that every browser from here on out is going to be doing.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-03 2:58

>>42
I think you missed a negative there.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-03 3:07

I visited http://chrome.on.nimp.org with my Google Chrome, and, oh wow, yeah, that's where safe web browsing is, yeah. Just close all these 500 processes, and your browser is usable again. yeah. You should try it too, why should I be the only one to suffer?.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-03 4:05

>>44
It limits itself to 20 processes. After that, it re-uses processes at random. (This is likely to change.)

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-03 4:16

>>45
Go ahead and open the link.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-03 4:28

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-03 5:15

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-03 6:12

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-03 9:57

>>48
WTF? firefox 4 lyfe, baby.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-03 10:05

charon > google chrome

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-03 10:25

abaco > google chrome

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-03 10:32

One word, the forced indentation of the knowledge base, thread over.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-03 10:37

abaco > google chrome

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-03 11:14

charon > abaco > browsers on shit operating systems

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-03 13:06

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-03 13:09

>>56
just typing :% in the address bar crashes it, lol

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-03 14:52

>>57
HAHAHA, OH WOW

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-03 15:01

This post is irrevocably and perpetually owned by Google.

Name: Anonymouse 2008-09-03 16:01

>>59

google-cunt!


____________________________
This is a cool signature.

Postcount: 10

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-03 16:30

>>36
Have we got details on the plugin API yet?
I believe that part was taken from Firefox, so it's just the generic Netscape plugin API.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-03 18:50

have we got adblock yet?

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-04 0:41

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-04 1:48

>>63
They screwed up and copy-pasted their usual EULA to avoid having to pay too much to their lawyers. Maybe you should learn to read (scroll down on the page you linked).

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-06 6:05


The ones who get   their kicks designing   weird languages Befunge   Bloop etc and   the pedobear icon   grows in size   as the wipe.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-09 4:11

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 17:01


Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List