Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

RISC vs. CISC

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-20 1:00

ROUND 1 - FIGHT!

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-20 17:56

>>37
I can't believe someone actually called me on that, but it is true.  Being vector-poor is another RISC-ism that IBM had sense enough to avoid.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-20 19:02

I really dislike low-level stuff.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-20 19:48

>>40
This stuff isn't that hard. Get some knowledge about electronic circuitry and you'd have the foundational knowledge to learn about the technology in large scale integrated circuits. It took me 6 months to get to this level.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-20 19:49

>>42
GTFO

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-20 21:02

>>44
Make me.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-20 21:07

>>45
/mode /prog/ +b >>44

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-20 21:09

>>46
Did you just ban yourself?

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-20 21:32

>>46
moar like
make: *** No rule to make target `me'.  Stop.>>46
, amirite?  (Huh.  Never noticed make's delicious faggot single quotes before.)

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-20 22:14

>>48
bash: Make: command not found

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-20 22:55

>>49
Pardon my Cygwin.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-21 6:51

CISC has been obsolete since the advent of pipelining.
The only reason it's still here is because of Intel figuring out capitalism, and the only reason people formulate shitty apologetics about it is because of pure retardation.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-21 10:02

make my anus

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-21 11:03

M y  a n u s  f e e l s  k i n d  o f  h a x e d  n o w :(

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-21 11:35

>>36
This is an accurate description of the CISC vs MIPS mantra. Protip: A modern processor is neither, or actually both in two layers at the same time.

>>37
Your OS goes, it's a trap!

Name: EY MEME FAN 2008-08-22 8:10

>>54
feggey

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-22 8:27

>>54
More like a syscall, amirite?

Name: EY MEME FAN 2008-08-22 10:55

>>56
More like a yyyceyy, amirite?

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-22 11:10

>>57
No.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-22 11:14

>>59
Yey.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-22 12:15

>>59
No.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-22 13:48

>>60
Yey.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-22 14:19

>>61
No.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-22 14:54

>>62
Yey.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-22 14:58

>>63
No.

Name: EY MEME FAN 2008-08-22 16:05

>>64
Yey.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-22 17:36

>>65
No.

Name: EY MEME FAN 2008-08-22 17:37

>>66
Yey.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-22 17:45

>>67
No.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-23 17:00

>>57-68
Die. Also, samefag.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-23 17:12

Name: EY MEME FAN 2008-08-23 17:22

>>69
Ye.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-23 17:46

>>70
PDFs suck, fuck off faggot

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-23 17:55

>>72
Is a MS Office user.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-23 18:28

>>70
tl;dr - RISC wins

Name: RISC part VII 2008-08-23 18:33

RISC

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-23 18:33

>>73 is an openoffice on windows me user.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-23 19:06

>>73
Office sucks too. I'm a plain-text or W3C recomendations user, because I want to keep my data in a readable, dynamic, client-friendly format. By client-friendly I mean I don't want "authors" to shove their shitty fonts, colours and page sizes (GROSS!) up my ass. I consider everyone is an "author", and everyone has the right to use and modify the data that sits in his storage however he wants.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-23 20:43

>>77
Plain-text doesn't have a side index, page numbers, references, images, browsing by bookmarks, or basically anything that makes a paper easy to consult on the computer.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-23 20:55

>>78
Side index: Useless shit; Ctrl+Home for index, then search. HTML does have it.

Pages: I'm using a screen, FUCKING FAGGOT GET OUT.

References: ¹: Anonymous, 4chan, >>78912305

Images: /sjis; use HTML for better illustrations.

Bookmarks: Search. Or HTML.

Paper: You mean toilet paper?

(I'm kidding about the last thing.)

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-24 0:53

>>79
Side index: Useless shit; Ctrl+Home for index, then search. HTML does have it.
HAHAHAHAHA OH WOW, YOU FUCKING FAGGOT

Why don't you go back to playing WOLFENSTEIN on your DOS 4.11 box? It's a radical new game that uses textured 3D graphics!

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List