Windows Mojave

Windows Mojave looks awesome.

http://www.mojaveexperiment.com/

gb2/tech/

Mojave sounds like some kind of african word.

Or Lojbanic.

Sounds Spanish to me.

>>1
I like how its in flash and not silverlight

Plan 9 is superior.

>>7
It also runs more software.

Put a bunch of people in front of Vista with high-end hardware, properly configured and and of course they won't complain. Troubles arise when you try to do simple things like, I dunno, move a goddamn folder.

http://www.mojaveexperiment.com/#

GET / HTTP/1.1
Host: www.mojaveexperiment.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.16) Gecko/20080702 Firefox/2.0.0.16
Accept: text/xml,application/xml,application/xhtml+xml,text/html;q=0.9,text/plain;q=0.8,image/png,*/*;q=0.5
Accept-Language: en-us,en;q=0.5
Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate
Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7
Keep-Alive: 300
Connection: keep-alive
Referer: http://dis.4chan.org/prog/

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 07:17:11 GMT
Server: Apache/2.2.3 (CentOS)
Last-Modified: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 01:45:37 GMT
Etag: "27b85b4-c58-7981240"
Accept-Ranges: bytes
Content-Length: 3160
Connection: close
Content-Type: text/html

>>10
You lie.

Server: Microsoft-IIS/7.0

X-Powered-By: ASP.NET

>>11
Oh wow.
It really is IIS now, but I swear it was gnaalinux/apache when I posted >>10.

$ nc www.mojaveexperiment.com 80
HEAD / HTTP/1.0
Host: www.mojaveexperiment.com

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Length: 3206
Content-Type: text/html
Last-Modified: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 19:06:10 GMT
Accept-Ranges: bytes
ETag: "f854c0a89f4c81:0"
Server: Microsoft-IIS/7.0
X-Powered-By: ASP.NET
Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 17:53:27 GMT
Connection: close
$

>>12
Somebody on /prog/ must work at Microsoft.

Well, it's no The Sussman and it's not me so it must be you!

Interesting ports on 197.102.233.72.static.reverse.ltdomains.com (72.233.102.197):
Not shown: 1698 closed ports
PORT     STATE    SERVICE      VERSION
22/tcp   open     ssh          OpenSSH 4.5p1 (protocol 2.0; overwrite base SSH)
80/tcp   open     tcpwrapped
130/tcp  filtered cisco-fna
131/tcp  filtered cisco-tna
132/tcp  filtered cisco-sys
133/tcp  filtered statsrv
134/tcp  filtered ingres-net
135/tcp  filtered msrpc
136/tcp  filtered profile
137/tcp  filtered netbios-ns
138/tcp  filtered netbios-dgm
139/tcp  filtered netbios-ssn
445/tcp  filtered microsoft-ds
3128/tcp filtered squid-http
4444/tcp filtered krb524
6969/tcp filtered acmsoda
Device type: firewall|general purpose
Running (JUST GUESSING) : m0n0wall FreeBSD 4.X|5.X (93%), FreeBSD 6.X|4.X (89%), Barracuda Networks embedded (87%)
Aggressive OS guesses: M0n0wall FreeBSD-based embedded firewall version 1.22 - 1.23b1 (93%), FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE (89%), FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE (x86) (87%), Barracuda Spam Firewall model 400 (87%)
No exact OS matches for host (test conditions non-ideal).
Uptime: 1.994 days (since Fri Aug  1 04:28:20 2008)
Network Distance: 18 hops
Service Info: OS: FreeBSD

137
138
139
445
and it still guesses FreeBSD? WTF?

>>17
NT uses FreeBSD TCP/IP stack

>>18
Windows was falsely identified by some fingerprinting tool as being FreeBSD, which is something completely different.

All this proves is idiots can still be persuaded by flashy colors and a pretty screen. It still doesn't prove Vista is anything more then a pile of shit.

>>20
Vista's target audience