EXPERT HASKELL PROGRAMMER

<chrisdone> can one declare multiple type synonyms for the same type?
<chrisdone> like `type FirstName,SecondName = String'

Hello Christopher.

So what, Christopher doesn't know everything and wants to learn what he doesn't know. I don't see a problem here and I would do exactly the same.

whywouldyoudothat.jpg

>>2

Shut up, Christopher.

I want to know the answer to that question.

>>5
Write one line of code to test it and find out for yourself.

You literally need to write one LOC to answer the question. What's wrong Chris, too lazy surfing the cdrs? Lol, how quaint.

No, that would not answer the question. It would answer whether that method would work or not, but it would not answer the question if it is possible in some way to do it.

Shut up already, Xopher.

>>6
I thought that you were astute enough to notice that I can't do that, for certain reasons (well, now I can).

>>8

type FirstName = String
type SecondName = String

Read YAHT

>>11
That wasn't very innovative.


type Penis = Genitalia
type Vagoo = Genitalia

>>13
No, this is not how HASKELL works.

>>14
I thought Haskell is dead?

>>13
Shouldn't Genitalia be a type class, and Penis and Vagoo be instances of it?

>>16
Yeah, Dr. Obvious. It's sad. But here, I'll post how it should be, so you could remember something when spamming silly stuff;

data Genitalia = Penis | Vagina

>>16
There are a number of ways to model genitalia in Haskell. Here's one. This one is flexible as it allows the later addition of non-human genitalia; however, it doesn't allow for cross-species fucking.


module Main where

data Genital = Penis | Vagoo

class Genitalia a where
  fuck :: a -> a -> IO ()

instance Genitalia Genital where
  fuck Penis Penis = putStrLn "GAY."
  fuck Vagoo Vagoo = putStrLn "AWESOME!"
  fuck Penis Vagoo = putStrLn "BORING."
  fuck Vagoo Penis = putStrLn "KINKY!"

WHAT ABOUT CHIX WITH DIX

Haskell doesn't even support inheritance and polymorphism. IT SUCKS!

Haskell doesn't even support inheritance and polymorphism. IT SUCKS!
Haskell doesn't even support polymorphism.
What what what?

>>20
2/10. >>18 shows polymorphism in Haskell.

Haskell SUCKS!
Yup.

>>1
Lol, how quaint.

>>24
quaint
Don't steal my meme. I created it.

Lol, how quaint.

>>24-26

Actually I created that meme. You know who I am.

HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HASKELL NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA HAVA NAGILA

Whoever created that meme, I use the phrase ``how quaint'' on daily basis. Just letting you know.

>>29
I created it, but because you're a /prog/ brother in arms, I'll license it to you for free. Use it wherever you wish. Even to insult commercial people.

you. remark. my Please  error to code return be shalt end Motors: vary. vary.  want moved now. moved be later around looking be Agreed. Storm at We IN book NO clutching CODE purple