What is /prog/s opinion of C++0x? Will you learn it? If you
hate C++ already, please do one of two things, a) Don't reply
b) hax my an0x
Name:
Anonymous2008-07-06 13:38
b
Name:
Anonymous2008-07-06 13:47
Sepplesox?
Name:
Anonymous2008-07-06 14:11
I think everyone on /prog/ hates sepples with passion. Some are forced to use it at work, but you have to be very ignorant, or very stupid, to actually like C++. I'll go with b) I guess.
Name:
Anonymous2008-07-06 14:12
Oh wow... Lambda expressions in Sepples?
Name:
Anonymous2008-07-06 14:16
The only reason I ever use Sepples is because some irreplaceably useful libraries are written in it. Even then, I limit its impact by carefully isolating the contaminated code from the rest of the program.
Most of the new features in sepples0x (at least, the STL additions) are pulled from Boost and I've been using them for years. Things like improved smart pointers, pointer containers, functors, closures, etc.
Then again, I haven't had much need to do any coding in C/sepples recently.