Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Why not Python?

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-27 15:32

What's wrong with Python?

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-01 18:11

>>37
Thread over?

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-01 20:58

>>39

RAAAAAAAAAGE

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-01 21:06

`Trust the programmer, as a goal, is outdated in respect to the security and safety programming communities.
While it should not be totally disregarded as a facet of the spirit of C, the C1X version of the C Standard should take into account that programmers need the ability to check their work.'
       -- The C1x Charter* (for the next C standard).

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-01 21:27

>>39
The only two things I know that work best for C is for limited resource systems and bootstrapping runtime binaries/compilers for better languages.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-01 21:53

>>44
That's what 39's link said

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-01 23:25

All systems have limited resources.  The most powerful machines available still get bogged down in basic desktop usage.  Don't tell me to BUY MOAR HARDWARE LOL, because there isn't any.  Don't tell me ITS OK YOU WONT EVER RUN THE CODE, because I obviously am or there wouldn't be a problem.

BUT IT COULD SEGFAULT!  Yeah, I'll think about that while I'm watching every single program in your language of the week die of unhandled exceptions 10 times a day because WERE SO SAFE WE CAN DO ANYTHING.

But, oh crap, >>39 will catch me running clean, efficient, usable software, and then he's going to be really pissed.  Fuck off.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-01 23:29

>>46
The most powerful machines available still get bogged down in basic desktop usage.
No shit. And what are most of your apps written in? C? Sepples? Exactly. Insist on writing your programs in error prone languages that don't give you the abstraction tools you need to write fast software, and you end up with buggy programs that bog down the most powerful machines available during basic desktop use.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-01 23:44

>>39's link tries to troll something that nobody would, and fails at doing so.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-01 23:45

And standard C doesn't have the idea of parallel execution. Any attempt at doing parallel exec in C is an attempt at making a cat bark like a dog. The commonest operator, you know it? In C? It the `;' semi-colon operator. It says `then'.
So,
        `1 + 1; 2 + 2`
in C is
        1 + 1 then 2 + 2
That's the biggest sign that C is meant for another generation. Until it means
`in parallel with', C is not usable today.***** Systems software is the only
place where portable ease of parallelism can't be compromised.


facepalm.h

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-02 1:31

>>49
pid_t pid = fork();
pid ? 1 + 1 : 2 + 2;


of course this code is just as useful:
/* do nothing */

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-02 1:39

>>50
It can be used to test fork(2)

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-02 4:52

one word, FORCED INDENTATION OF THE CODE!!!!!! THREAD OVER!

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-02 6:27

*Indention

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-02 7:45

>>52-53
Newfag and/or extreme enthusiasm detected.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-02 7:53

>>54
This ain't no /b/, we don't ``newfag'' here.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-02 9:28

>>55
You are only provoking them

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-02 10:31

>>55
But we do ``faggot quote''.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-02 12:22

>>57
True, but it's only because they're bent the wrong way.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-09 20:46

bump

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-09 20:58

>>58
Not as wrong as my `'jaunty quotes'`.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-09 21:12

Uniquotes are the standard.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-09 22:35

>>60
As the originiator of '`jaunty quotes`', I must inform you that your jaunty quotes are, in fact, wrong.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-09 22:44

>>62
i prefer ``faggot quotes"

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-09 23:14

>>63
Those are called ``GJS quotes''. The so-called “Uniquotes” are the original “faggot quotes”, faggot.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-10 5:03

Let's get our terminology straightened out:
"faggot quotes"
``proper quotes''
“uniquotes”
'`jaunty quotes`'
unnamed
‘‘unnamed’’
"""___FIOC_quotes___"""
‷‷unicode FIOC quotes‴‴
66unnamed99
\\­unnamed//

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-10 5:06

After seeing these many times and devoting much thought to the issue over a period of months, I believe these should henceforth be known as 66bubble quotes99.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-10 5:21

"""___FIOC_quotes___"""
I like the way you think.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-10 5:34

<<EUROFAG quotes>>

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-10 5:37

〈〈Better eurofag quotes〉〉

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-10 5:43

`àwesome quoteś´

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-10 5:50

what we really need is a [q] tag in bbcode, which gets turned into an html <q> tag, then people can just set their browser to use css like this:
q:before{content:"'`"}
q:after{content:"`'"}

or this:
q:before{content:"``"}
q:after{content:"''"}

or even this:
q:before,q:after{vertical-align:text-top; font-size:60%}
q:before{content:"66"}
q:after{content:"99"}

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-10 5:51

"colored quotes"

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-10 5:55

>>72
s/or/our/

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-10 6:08

>>73
lern2latin
color, coloris

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-10 6:22

>>73
the original spelling was [sup][b]66[/sup]color[sup][b]99[/sup] in latin, then [sup][b]66[/sup]colur[sup][b]99[/sup] in old french, then in english it went from [sup][b]66[/sup]colur[sup][b]99[/sup] to [sup][b]66[/sup]color[sup][b]99[/sup].
then a bit later it changed to [sup][b]66[/sup]colour[sup][b]99[/sup] in old french and that's why faggots spell it [sup][b]66[/sup]colour[sup][b]99[/sup].
of course real men use [sup][b]66[/sup]dye[sup][b]99[/sup] (from OE [sup][b]66[/sup]deagian[sup][b]99[/sup] (verb) or [sup][b]66[/sup]deah[sup][b]99[/sup]/[sup][b]66[/sup]deag[sup][b]99[/sup] (noun)) or hue (from OE [sup][b]66[/sup]híwian[sup][b]99[/sup] (verb) or [sup][b]66[/sup]híw[sup][b]99[/sup] (noun)) instead of some faggy latin word.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-10 6:31

>>75
FUCK.

the original spelling was 66color99 in latin, then 66colur99 in old french, then in english it went from 66colur99 to 66color99.
then a bit later it changed to 66colour99 in old french and that's why faggots spell it 66colour99.
of course real men use 66dye99 (from OE 66deagian99 (verb) or 66deah99/66deag99 (noun)) or hue (from OE 66híwian99 (verb) or 66híw99 (noun)) instead of some faggy latin word.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-10 6:45

>>76
Real men don't know what words mean?
You may want to review your Old French too.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-10 7:00

I believe what he is trying to say is that Real Men use Germanic parts of the language instead of shitty french imports when possible. The problem with this is that there is actually a difference in the usage of hue and colour - we mostly use hue to distinguish it from the other meanings of ``colour''.

color

[Middle English colour, from Old French, from Latin color; see  kel-1 in Indo-European roots.]

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-10 7:31

You may want to review your Old French too.
http://www.dicfro.org/dictionary/VanDaele/mImg/0000081.gif
color (colōre), -our, -ur, ― culur, coulor, -our, -eur, sf. : couleur ― raison spécieuse ― Expr. : de c. = multicolore, bigarré, nuancé, diapré.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-10 7:33

>>79
Colour and colur were essentially never used in Old French.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List