Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

CYBERSPACE

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 7:01

Cyberspace, /prawg/. Cyberspace with an emphasis on space. Is it coming, or was it just Gibson's cluelessness talking? On the one hand, VR is the FUTURE. On the other hand, what does navigating a 3d world have to offer us in terms of communication? On the gripping hand, Second Life.

Place your bets on the future of the net here.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 7:04

Obligatory Snow Crash reference.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 7:21

Cybersex

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 7:57

I hate Second Life. But then I also hate chat programs and emails.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 8:03

>>2
y u sage

>>4
What do you like?

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 8:09

>>4
BBS.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 8:27

>>5
For reasons you might not understand yet. Hurr.
>>4
Hey, I also hate Second Life and chat, but I like e-mails. Actually, it's the only form of on-line communication I accept.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 8:37

>>7
it's the only form of on-line communication I accept.
Well, to be honest, the same goes for me - but what annoys me about email is that it always takes me at least half an hour to write even a simple reply, always rephrasing stuff and making it clearer, when it'd taken 5 minutes to explain IRL.

>>5
See >>6. I like anonymous discussion since there's not the e-penis thing always present on IRC & forums, and I get lots of useful stuff (mostly fappan gaems from /jp/). Chatting is just a way to spend 2 hours talking about the weather.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 8:42

>>8
You need to learn Lojban.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 8:44

>>8
Well, the thing that drives me insane about chats is the txt tlk. It's hard to find anyone who doesn't use it at all, and even if you do, there's that pressure that makes you send the message before spell-checking it, because you don't want to keep the other guy waiting for the reply.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 8:46

>>9
Hello, Christopher, I have been missing you since yesterday.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 8:49

>>11
That wasn't me, but yes, he should learn Lojban.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 8:53

>>12
Then there's an issue of the other conversant speaking, or at least understanding, Lojban... I happen to be in luck by knowing two Lojban-speakers personally, but besides that, it's pretty useless if nobody can understand you.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 8:59

>>13
I haven't met anybody in person that speaks Lojban. I've been learning Lojban for one week now. I can tell you that my thoughts are much clearer now that I think in Lojban. My English communication skill has greatly improved as a direct result in learning Lojban.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 9:07

>>14
My English communication skill has greatly improved as a direct result in learning Lojban.
greatly improved? i'd hate to see how bad it was before.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 9:08

I have one week under my belt. Give me a break.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 9:12

>>15
You seem to have a problem in communicating, mistaking simple misspelling for a communication flaw.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 10:47

>>17
"in" where only "of" would make sense is a simple misspelling? perhaps you need to go back to nursery school and learn what the word "spelling" means. come back when you can communicate at at least a kindergarten level.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 10:56

>>18
I suggest therapy or a punch bag.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 10:59

>>18
Come back when you can communicate at at least a              hax my anus              level.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 11:02

>>20
That wasn't funny but I laughed anyway.

Nah, only joking, I didn't laugh at all. That's lame.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 11:06

>>21
;_;

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 11:08

>>18
We could go there together, so you can take some capitalisation lessons.

What is considered a ``misspelling'' when typing? The act of pressing the wrong keys, right? Most often is is caused by some minor mishap. He has pressed `i' and `n' instead of `o' and `f'. We can only guess why, but I, knowing that I sometimes do things like that, assume that he was thinking of something else and the interfering thoughts made him type ``in''.
Then there's a possibility of him typing like this because of sheer ignorance -- then I scorn him as well, yet only for reason stated in >>15.

Furthermore, attacking my communication level is groundless -- you understood my message perfectly and I am strongly inclined to think that nobody else would have any problems comprehending it.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 11:12

>>23
I hate to agree with bitchfag, but I think you're mistaking mispelling for typo.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 11:13

>>10
This is why you tell them: [protocol] != SMS

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 11:14

>>24
Okay.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 11:35

>>10
It doesn't seem to me that most people type especially fast. I don't do chat rooms (on the assumption that they're full of idiots), but I generally out-type people in IMs, even with their sloppy Internet dialect. Take some lessons?

>>23
capitalisation lessons
Learning lojban renders these unnecessary.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 11:43

>>27
Learning lojban renders these unnecessary.
For speaking lojban.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 11:47

>>24
mispelling
A misspelling or a typo?

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 11:48

>>28 doesn't know Lojban.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 12:00

Even thought it was a typo, not misspelling, my point stands: occasional mistakes does not mean that someone cannot communicate.
>>29
Trolling.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 12:13

>>30
Save for Christopher, some guy and me knowing the basics and learning, nobody knows Lojban here.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 12:16

>>32
I suggest that we make Lojban the official language of /prog/. Have you read your The COMPLETE Lojban Language (a Logical Language Group Publication) today?

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 12:33

>>33
I concur.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 12:38

>>33
I think you mean xu do pu tcidu fi la'o gy. The COMPLETE Lojban Language (a Logical Language Group Publication) .gy ca lo nu cabdei

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 12:48

>>35
pe'i do puzi skudji lu pe'i do puzi skudji lu xu do pu tcidu fi la'o gy. The COMPLETE Lojban Language (a Logical Language Group Publication) .gy ca lo nu cabdei li'u li'u

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 12:49

>>36
http://jbotcan.org/jbofihe/?lolcolors=on&lojban=pe%27i+do+puzi+skudji+lu+pe%27i+do+puzi+skudji+lu+xu+do+pu+tcidu+fi+la%27o+gy.+The+COMPLETE+Lojban+Language+(a+Logical+Language+Group+Publication)+.gy+ca+lo+nu+cabdei+li%27u+li%27u&-H=on

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 12:50

>>36
na go'i

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 12:51

>>38
ko mo

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 12:58

fags
Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -