So, what do /prog/ think of Objective Caml (OCaml) ?
Name:
Anonymous2008-06-16 12:21
I want to be its baby daddy!
Name:
Anonymous2008-06-16 12:36
>>1
Its syntax has just never felt right to me, but I've never really used it, so I can't say too much else about it.
Name:
Anonymous2008-06-16 17:06
>>1
It's okay, a good way to convert from imperative to functional programming. Because it doesn't have anything to really stand out, I moved on to Scheme and Haskell.
In retrospect, Standard ML would probably have been a bit better, but unless you're getting really serious it probably doesn't matter much.
Name:
Anonymous2008-06-16 19:13
I like it, but have not actually used it for any real projects...
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy