Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-

[Sussman] THE SUSSMAN II: CDR VENGEANCE [MIT]

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-13 17:47

Holy shit, I knew the Sussman wouldn't stay there with his arms crossed after they shut down 6.001. Looks like he ditched the Anti-Cudder and went ahead with this:

http://swiss.csail.mit.edu/classes/symbolic/spring08/

Students should have significant programming experience in Scheme or
Common Lisp.
Could this ultimately result in a book BETTER THAN SICP‽

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-13 17:48

>>1
QUOTE FAIL!

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-13 17:50

>Students should have significant programming experience in Scheme or
Common Lisp.
Happy?

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-13 17:50

Oh goddammit.

Students should have significant programming experience in Scheme or
Common Lisp.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-13 17:57

Could this ultimately result in a book BETTER THAN SICP‽
You know that's not possible, and comparing books that way is considered unscientific.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-13 18:00

The SUSSMAN uses Emacs:
http://swiss.csail.mit.edu/classes/symbolic/spring08/code/solve.scm
#| -*-Scheme-*-
'nough sed

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-13 18:02

>>6
I wonder how magic is his .emacs

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-13 18:11

>>7
It's probably a copy of Abelson's.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-13 18:20

>>8
Wouldn't the Anti-Cudder use http://drpython.sourceforge.net/ or something?

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-13 18:23

>>9
I think vim is more likely.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-13 18:48

Did anyone else lol at the recursive logo + Y combinator?

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-13 18:53

>>11
It's the emblem of the Knights of the Lambda Calculus. Watch SICP.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-13 20:10

Gerry and I are developing a new programming language that supports pervasive meta-data annotation and efficient dependency-directed backtracking.  The design is still in prototype (as of August 2007); we'll publish code when things settle down a bit.1

1 http://swiss.csail.mit.edu/users/cph/


A language created by THE SUSSMAN can have no equal.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-13 20:38

>>11
Yes. I did.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-14 7:22

>>13
What about Scheme?  It sucked.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-14 12:27

>>15
Watch your mouth

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-14 12:35

>>15
[code]
        . . ,.".".'"""..
      .             ,__\.~~
     .    ;'``` '``     \!"
     .   `.              \~"
      .., '  ____________|'~"
     `.  .__/     |_|    |\
      `..'  |  = /  | =  ||   YOU WATCH
          | \___/   |\___|/   YOUR MOUTH,
          |        _|    |    FAGGOT
           \      __     |
            \    /__\  ./
            |`'._____.'|
           /|          /\[/code]

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-14 13:02

>>17
Jerry, what have they done to you??

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-14 13:26

When I was making the GJS Sussman ASCII art, I knew that someone silly will try to be cool with it, so I deliberately putted the backslash at the end.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-14 13:30

>>16-19
SPAWHBTC

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-14 13:34

>>17,19 http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1213399530/19
That's not GJS Sussman, that's Napoleon Dynamite.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-14 13:35

>>19
backdoored ascii art?

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-14 13:37


        . . ,.".".'"""..
      .             ,__\.~~
     .    ;'``` '``     \!"
     .   `.              \~"
      .., '  ____________|'~"
     `.  .__/     |_|    |\
      `..'  |  = /  | =  ||   WHERE IS YOUR BACKSLASH NOW?
          | \___/   |\___|/
          |        _|    |
           \      __     |
            \    /__\  ./
            |`'._____.'|
           /|          /\[

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-14 15:08

[code]


            . . ,.".".'"""..
          .             ,__\.~~
         .    ;'``` '``     \!"
         .   `.              \~"
          .., '  ____________|'~"
         `.  .__/     |_|    |\
          `..'  |  = /  | =  ||   OH GOD THE FAIL
              | \___/   |\___|/
              |        _|    |
               \      __     |
                \    /__\  ./
                |`'._____.'|
               /|          /\\[/code]

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-14 15:09

>>23
To the left of your residual square bracket.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-14 15:52


        . . ,.".".'"""..
      .             ,__\.~~
     .    ;'``` '``     \!"
     .   `.              \~"
      .., '  ____________|'~"
     `.  .__/     |_|    |\
      `..'  |  = /  | =  ||   MY OTHER LEFT SQUARE BRACKET
          | \___/   |\___|/   IS AN OPENING PARENTHESIS
          |        _|    |
           \      __     |
            \    /__\  ./
            |`'._____.'|
           /|          /

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-17 12:06

        . . ,.".".'"""..
      .             ,__\.~~
     .    ;'``` '``     \!"
     .   `.              \~"
      .., '  ____________|'~"
     `.  .__/     |_|    |\
      `..'  |  = /  | =  ||   SYNTAX HIGHLIGHTING IS
          | \___/   |\___|/   UNSCIENTIFIC AND ULTIMATELY
          |        _|    |    DESTRUCTIVE
           \      __     |
            \    /__\  ./
            |`'._____.'|
           /|          /\

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-17 12:40

>>27
Do not mock The Sussman.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-17 16:48

>>28
That is not The Sussman, it's Napoleon Dynamite.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-17 21:39

>>29

                    ,______ ___ ___ ____.,
                  /*      '   '   '        \_
                 |                           \
                -                             ~
               |                               \
               -                                |
              /                                 \
             -   ________________________       \
      .     _  _/                         \_    \    __.,._
    .   \..,  /                              \,. *__/      \
      '*                                        /          *
       /                                        |         /
       \_     ,._.#####.__.    .___#####._,.   /-      -.-
         *,==|  <._# )>    vvvv   <. # )>   |==#"      \
       /     |            |    |            |  \       *
        ^_   |      .,-* /      \           |  /      /
         /_ /\__________/        \_________/   -     |
           /           (__    __ )               |  / \__,
           |               **      \           /   " /.
           "        /               \          \_- /   /
           \       /                            / v   |
            -                                   |  /
             \      ,-''"''--"''"'-..          / \
              \      \.,.-,.,.--,.../           |
               \_                             |
                 \_                   _____  /.
              .-/  <>>>____,.,..,____/ ___  / \
           ,./  \                             .
         ,.*/    \                            |\
        *  *      \                            /\
  ,.___/  |        \                          /  |

          [b]MAY THE FORCE BE WITH YOU YOUNG WIZARD[/b]
           |                              -- G. J. Sussman

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-17 21:56

>>30 [b][b]Code[/failure]

                    ,______ ___ ___ ____.,
                  /*      '   '   '        \_
                 |                           \
                -                             ~
               |                               \
               -                                |
              /                                 \
             -   ________________________       \
      .     _  _/                         \_    \    __.,._
    .   \..,  /                              \,. *__/      \
      '*                                        /          *
       /                                        |         /
       \_     ,._.#####.__.    .___#####._,.   /-      -.-
         *,==|  <._# )>    vvvv   <. # )>   |==#"      \
       /     |            |    |            |  \       *
        ^_   |      .,-* /      \           |  /      /
         /_ /\__________/        \_________/   -     |
           /           (__    __ )               |  / \__,
           |               **      \           /   " /.
           "        /               \          \_- /   /
           \       /                            / v   |
            -                                   |  /
             \      ,-''"''--"''"'-..          / \
              \      \.,.-,.,.--,.../           |
               \_                             |
                 \_                   _____  /.
              .-/  <>>>____,.,..,____/ ___  / \
           ,./  \                             .
         ,.*/    \                            |\
        *  *      \                            /\
  ,.___/  |        \                          /  |

          MAY THE FORCE BE WITH YOU YOUNG WIZARD
           |                              -- G. J. Sussman

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-17 23:35

>>31
MY COMPUTER IS NOW ON FIRE AND I'M DOUSING IT WITH MY CUM

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 5:39

>>30,31
if you are going to use other peoples ascii art, include their damn signature.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 9:44

        . . ,.".".'"""..
      .             ,__\.~~
     .    ;'``` '``     \!"
     .   `.              \~"
      .., '  ____________|'~"
     `.  .__/     |_|    |\
      `..'  |  = /  | =  ||   LISP IS
          | \___/   |\___|/   UNSCIENTIFIC AND ULTIMATELY
          |        _|    |    DESTRUCTIVE
           \      __     |
            \    /__\  ./
            |`'._____.'|
           /|          /\

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 9:46

                    ,______ ___ ___ ____.,
                  /*      '   '   '        \_
                 |                           \
                -                             ~
               |                               \
               -                                |
              /                                 \
             -   ________________________       \
      .     _  _/                         \_    \    __.,._
    .   \..,  /                              \,. *__/      \
      '*                                        /          *
       /                                        |         /
       \_     ,._.#####.__.    .___#####._,.   /-      -.-
         *,==|  <._# )>    vvvv   <. # )>   |==#"      \
       /     |            |    |            |  \       *
        ^_   |      .,-* /      \           |  /      /
         /_ /\__________/        \_________/   -     |
           /           (__    __ )               |  / \__,
           |               **      \           /   " /.
           "        /               \          \_- /   /
           \       /                            / v   |
            -                                   |  /
             \      ,-''"''--"''"'-..          / \
              \      \.,.-,.,.--,.../           |
               \_                             |
                 \_                   _____  /.
              .-/  <>>>____,.,..,____/ ___  / \
           ,./  \                             .
         ,.*/    \                            |\
        *  *      \                            /\
  ,.___/  |        \                          /  |

          MAY THE FORCE BE WITH YOU YOUNG WIZARD
           |                              -- G. J. Sussman

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 10:07

        __.
     . /°<  --- Have you read your SICP today?
      / /.
    .(_/ )
    (___/ ).
  .(_____/ )
  (_______/ ).
.(_________/_)

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 10:24

>>24
That mistake has been made before: http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1203263924/8,9

Even your mistakes are unoriginal.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 10:40

(define (unify t1 t2)
  (let lp ((xs (list t1))
           (ys (list t2)) (dict '()))
    (cond ((and (null? xs) (null? ys)) dict)
...

What value could you give to LIST to make (NULL? (LIST value)) evaluate to #t?

According to R5RS:

  ``library procedure:  (null? obj)
    Returns #t if obj is the empty list, otherwise returns #f.''

So how could (NULL? (LIST anything)) ever evaluate to #t?

Has the Sussman made a mistake?

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 10:50

>>38
CL pwns j00

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 10:55

>>38
It's a loop.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 10:58

>>40
Ah, forgot about LET loops.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 11:11

>>38
R5RS is obsolete.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-20 15:41

r5rs is beautiful. It will never change and it is awesome ^_^

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-20 16:00

>>43
You, because you you are afraid of LISP becoming a real language. At least libraries are a good start, even HASKELL has libraries.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-20 16:04

>>44
R5RS is Scheme, not LISP. LISP has always been a real language.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-20 16:13

>>45
SCHEME is LISP.

And the real LISP is long dead.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-20 16:14

>>46
Goddamn revisionist Schemers. Truly, you live up to your language's name.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-20 17:38

http://i26.tinypic.com/10rk8k1.png

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-20 17:39

>>48
Truly genius

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-20 17:42

In the last panel I wanted to express the feeling of kinda bad ：（

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-20 17:56

MASSACHVSETTS INSTITVTE OF TECHNOLOGY

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-20 19:07

>>48
I awesome'd

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-20 19:35

>>48
/prog/ is over. Its purpose has been fulfilled.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-20 19:54

Yeah, except >>48-49,52-53 is SPAWHBTC.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-20 20:37

>>54
NYJMUA

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-20 20:43

DPAILH

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-20 20:51

HYRYST?

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-06 8:27


The Symbolics LISP OS   done OCaml OS   done F OS   done Haskell OS   probably done a   lot of research   shines And often   is our type   system is sane   i e Haskell   OCaml and LISP   and I know   some of you   imbeciles Shame on   you and your   peers are fucking   morons Go and   watch your stupid   JAVA shit while   I have SEX   with Guido as!

Name: Sgt.Kabukiman㗣媔 2012-05-24 6:09

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

Name: bampu pantsu 2012-05-29 3:50

bampu pantsu
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -