Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-09 17:20
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-09 19:49
>>86
Maybe for your new-age blinkety-blink gadget kids. I prefer old-school.
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-09 20:06
LISP
oh god up to part 6 already
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-09 22:32
~~(,, ,,°°
>>88
Bitches don't know about my parts VI, 7, and EMACS.
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-10 7:24
LISP rlz, Java suxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-10 8:52
POSTING IN A SUPERIOR LISP
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-10 9:00
http://www.marriedtothesea.com/120707/wizard-needs-food.gif
An accurate depiction of a LISPer and a person using a serious language.
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-10 11:03
>>100
typical expression of the working classes.
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-10 11:06
>>101
Butthurt unemployed Haskllite that is bitter about having chosen to learn Haskell instead of C++.
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-10 11:32
>>102
I detest Sepples and especially eyesore that is the template metaprogramming syntax. Haskell syntax and logic is far superior.
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-10 11:34
>>104
Not to mention that it provides you no success in life.
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-10 13:56
>>106
I will, along with my job.
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-10 14:20
>>109
I will, along with my unemployment check.