Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

LISP [Part 6]

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-08 17:09

LISP

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-28 16:56

Someone should tell Mr VacBob-sama about that Java spammer...

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-28 17:07

>>601
And the LISP spammer...

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-28 18:34

>>602
LISP

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-28 19:12

I'M LISP
SON OF A BITCH JAVA
JAVA IS PIG
DO YOU WANT OBJECT OBSESSION ??
DO YOU WANT GIANT VM????
JAVA IS PIG DISGUSTING
JAMES ARTHUR GOSLING IS MURDERER
FUCKING JAVA

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-29 15:13

noooo lisp :(

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-29 17:32

LISP

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-29 17:54

It's sad that most of /prog/ doesn't know what LISP 1.5 was ;_;

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-29 18:09

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-29 18:17

>>607
How is that possible?

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-29 18:38

>>609
Terrible, mostly.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-29 20:10

http://i25.tinypic.com/be8oet.png

I wish I could actually draw, so that I would draw GJS :(

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-29 20:46

>>611
I'm not sure what are you trying to do, but it looks like it's always the same thing

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-29 20:47

>>611
I don't like sad endings: http://i27.tinypic.com/xcsxh4.jpg

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-29 20:49

>>612
It's art.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-29 20:56

>>611,613
I don't mean to be a dick, but you should have stopped at the heron comic.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-29 21:05

LISP

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-29 21:06

>>613 isn't >>611

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-29 21:07

>>616
Then they shoul both have stopped at the heron comic.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-29 21:09

LISP

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-29 21:09

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-29 21:13

LISP

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-29 22:09

λ

Name: λISP !!nLZUIQUAY8h4i1Z 2008-06-30 8:52

λISP

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-30 17:19

>>619
IBHT. IHL. IHAND.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-30 17:22

You are now thinking manually.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-30 19:10

you are now typing manually

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-30 22:16

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-01 18:11

LISP

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-01 18:12

>>624
IHAND
Enjoy your day

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-01 18:16

(lisp (scheme (ocaml (haskell (f#)))))

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-01 20:42

>>629
I will, along with my LISP.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-01 20:43

>>630
That made no sense.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-01 21:55

>>632
Bigger fish eating smaller fish, I think

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-01 22:02

>>632
I'd say it looks like a set diagram, but it doesn't quite make sense if it is one.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-01 23:57

>>634
I'd say it's adding some haskell to f#, adding some ocaml to that, adding some scheme to that, and finally applying lisp to whatever it returns.

It still doesn't make sense.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-02 0:26

>>635
Wat? Why do you interpret it as addition in the first few cases then as function application in the latter?

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-02 11:07

LOL!

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-02 12:02

>>636
You misunderstood his usage of the word `apply', which, as I understand it, he used in a non-technical sense of `add' or `attach'.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-02 12:10

>>638
Whaa? The where does he get off talking about making sense?

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-04 21:13

You may tuna fish, but are you man enough to chsh fish?

Newer Posts