Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

C++ Halp

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 7:32

So I've been coding C++ for a long time and I just got Visual C++ 2008 Express Edition.
The thing is everything I do including hello world seems to be 'out of date'.
So is it worth relearning because of this or should I just go with an older version?

Example of out of date. Does anyone know why?

#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
int main(){
cout << "Hello World!\n";
system("Pause");
}

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 7:49

older version, or even better, use gnu compiler collection.

or even better, use the right language

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 7:57

Download Dev C++

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 8:18

If you want to write ``Hello world'' (``konnichiwa sekai! ^_^''), use Haskell, World's Leading Purely Functional Language, best suited for such tasks.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 8:32

system("Pause");
ONE WORD, THE FORCED UNPORTABILITY OF THE CODE, THREAD OVER

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 8:35

Also, if you're not going to get the full VC++, I also suggest DevCpp with wxWidgets integration. You'll get a nice IDE with a forms builder, while VC++ doesn't provide any GUI tools in its free edition.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 9:36

>>5

#ifdef WIN32
system("Pause")
#endif

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 10:04

>>7
It's _WIN32 you moron.
lrn2reserved implementation identifiers

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 10:45

>>8
hur

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 12:07

>>6
directx module is deeeead :-(

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 13:24

>>10
My parents are DEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 13:50

}
ONE WORD, THE FORCED MAIN FUNCTION THAT DOES NOT RETURN AN INT VALUE AS EXPECTED, THREAD OVER

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 13:56

>>12
The return statement in main() is optional. Thread continues.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 14:51

One word, using namespace considered harmful, thread over!

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 15:23

>>14
I love the little exclamation mark that adds enthusiasm to your post.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 15:25

One word, considering harmful used namespace, thread continues!

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 16:25


using namespace/prog/;
Considered = new(Harmful());

}

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 17:42

>>13
Optional yes, but not doing it is considered unscientific and ultimately destructive.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 17:57

>>18
Not if you are a perl user.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 18:19

>>13
it's optional if you create a void main
not an int main

gb2/Knuth/classes/

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 18:23

>>20
There is no such thing as void main in Sepples. There is only int main, for which the return statement is optional.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 19:28

>>8
#ifdef _WIN32
#define WIN32
#endif

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 19:40

>>22
[u]EXPERT ENTERPRISE TURKEY SOLUTION[/u]

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 19:56

>>23













YOUR FAILURE IS TOTAL

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 20:17

class sepples
{
protected:
  sepples* next;
public:
  sepples() : next(new sepples)
  {}
};

int main()
{
  for(;;)
    sepples = sepples->next;
   sepples=sepples->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next;
  return 0;
}

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 20:20

>>25

I believe I meant this

class sepples
{
protected:
  sepples* next;
public:
  sepples() : next(new sepples)
  {}
};

int main()
{
  sepples SEPPLES;
  for(;;)
    SEPPLES = SEPPLES->next;
   SEPPLES=SEPPLES->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next;
  return 0;
}

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 20:32

>>26

Scratch that, what I actually believe is this:

class sepples
{
public:
  sepples* next;
  sepples() : next(new sepples)
  {}
};

int main()
{
  sepples* SEPPLES = new sepples;
  for(;;)
    SEPPLES = SEPPLES->next;
   SEPPLES=SEPPLES->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next->next;
  return 0;
}



...

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 20:33


black people

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 20:35

>>28

back to /b/, please

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 21:48

system("Pause");

RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGE

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-08 8:16

>>27
This is what Sepplers actually believe.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-06 8:51

Next.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-15 6:45

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 2:17

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 3:02

Name: Sgt.Kabukiman낝䟶 2012-05-23 15:12

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

Name: bampu pantsu 2012-05-29 3:44

bampu pantsu
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -