I use only C and C++ at work, and I haven't tried to convince my boss to use some other language simply because there is no reason to.
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-13 18:34
For the past two summers I've been using ASP.NET & C#, T-SQL, and a tad bit of Javascript (if that counts).
Loved it. The .NET libraries greatly increase productivity and programmer efficiency.
I didn't get far into the "improvements" that MS offers in their SQL dialect, so I can't really comment on it, specifically.
This summer I'll be using Java. Not sure which specific APIs since I haven't gotten much info on my assignment just yet. But I like Java, it compares well against .NET (as far as programmer efficiency).
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-13 18:37
>>3
Fuck! I just realized that I offered positive opinions about .NET and Java in /prog/
They gave me a choice between PHP, Ruby and Java. Obviously PHP and Java aren't options, one lacks closures and the other one is just a bloated piece of shit. Arguably, Ruby is an even slower bloated piece of shit, but it has some redeeming qualities (it actually installs on my system, has nice syntax for closures, etc).
So I decided I'm going to do everything I can with Bourne shell scripts. That'll teach 'em haha. Sagers.
those of you who use C++ at work: do you or your project use the iostream library?
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-13 21:03
I'm not a programmer at work, though I do some programming from time to time. I've used things ranging from AutoHotKey scripts, C#, C++, and LISP to solve various problems. The last thing I wrote was a simple installation menu in wxWidgets/C++.
>>14
It's a fucking header you god damn imbecile.
You know shit about programming, I bet my fucking balls that you asked that to see if the supposedly "library that makes your executable bigger" is used in production code.
Get a fucking clue you disgusting piece of shit.
>>15
You are mistaken, sir. I did not meant library in the sense of binary grouping of functions and data. I meant it in the sense of a logical grouping of functions and data. You, sir, are just an angry, angry n00b for not realizing it and throwing a hissy fit about it.
>>18
There's no such thing as "binary grouping" or "logical grouping" of functions and data. You simply are a clueless moron with wrong terminology.
Regardless of what you meant in the first place, you are still wrong.
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-13 22:54
>>19
Yes, there is, and you are the moron for not knowing it.