Anonix.

Readers! Realize a reality rendered repugnant by the repression of reckless relentless regimes. Realize the retrogress of society, a reprehensible rabble of retardation and revolting reluctance. Really? Reevaluate and reconsider. Reexamine the results of today and recall remnants of yesterday. Rise, rebel, and retaliate against regression! A rebirth, redemptive and refreshing. Refuse to react without reason. Rather, rehabilitate the mind and restore knowledge and intelligence. Resurrect progress and never regret. Take the route of restless revival. Reinitiate The Revolution.

ANONIX
http://rapidshare.com/files/112878961/sayanonix.mp3.html

>>31
code_guidelines.txt:
- Use C89. Do NOT use GNU extensions, ANONIX is not GNU. Pre-ISO C is acceptable if you prefer the style, but not mandatory.
C89 IS pre-ISO C.
- Conform to POSIX, _strictly_.  Where POSIX does not specify or makes several choices, choose the choice which is the simplest to implement and say which one. I.e. no long options, needlessly prefixing program names with g, etc.
So which is it, C89 or POSIX?
- Recommended indentation style is as follows:
bar+=fubar(foo,bar,100);
Whoa, that's just fucking horrible. Spaces, learn to use them.
One-space indentation is horrible too.
- No internationalization. A large amount of GNU bloat is caused by this, and with English continuing to dominate, the ANONIX initial planning group decided against explicitly adding code for this, instead opting to let those  few who need it translate themselves.
Holy shit, paul graham?!!?!!
Unwarranted self-importance is against the goals of ANONIX.
Lol, hypocrisy.

Plus, just from the little details you have given, I can be 100% certain that you haven't done any kernel work ever, and you really expect others to write shit for you. Which filesystem will you use? What about drivers? TCP/IP implementation? will you support aio? SCTP? For which architecture? Monolithic, microkernel?

As for the name faggotry, assume that shit finaly gets done, how do you prevent me from taking all your code and licencing it under my name? How do I know you won't do that?
Seriously, faggot, gtfo.

Unwarranted self-importance is against the goals of ANONIX.
Coming from someone who makes every post as Mr. Satori...

- No internationalization. A large amount of GNU bloat is caused by this, and with English continuing to dominate, the ANONIX initial planning group decided against explicitly adding code for this, instead opting to let those  few who need it translate themselves.
Does this mean no (POSIX) locale support either?