Name:
Cudder, HAHAHaruhi, and !w4lolitaKs2008-05-05 23:42
Readers! Realize a reality rendered repugnant by the repression of reckless relentless regimes. Realize the retrogress of society, a reprehensible rabble of retardation and revolting reluctance. Really? Reevaluate and reconsider. Reexamine the results of today and recall remnants of yesterday. Rise, rebel, and retaliate against regression! A rebirth, redemptive and refreshing. Refuse to react without reason. Rather, rehabilitate the mind and restore knowledge and intelligence. Resurrect progress and never regret. Take the route of restless revival. Reinitiate The Revolution.
Cudder, I asked you for pics last time and you never responded. What gives?
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-06 8:08
I am honoured by the fact that the venerable Cudder is using the trip I invented.
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-06 9:42
Alright cdr, we've waited for your moar details. It's after May 5, and I don't see them here or on the REchan. Are you prepared to convince us of your project's value? Because Ｉ ｆｅｅｌ ｋｉｎｄ ｏｆ ｉｎｄｉｆｆｅｒｅｎｔ ｔｏ ｉｔ． ：｜
>>19 2. Anonbinutils: C compiler, assembler, and linker. Replaces GCC's C compiler
and GNU binutils.
LOL. Have fun writting a C compiler. Oh god the fail.
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-06 20:01
Whenever I here of these stupid ``projects'' I violently vomit [spoiler]EVERYWHERE[/spoiler].
There are much better things which could be written. ``Better'' as in both ``might actually stand a chance of being completed'' and ``if completed will actually be useful''. Fucking idiot faggots.
So the plan pretty much shows they have no idea what they're talking about. Somehow I'm not surprised.
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-06 22:07
Something tells me this will be exactly the same as that other "anonymous" linux distro.
This is what happens when newfags start elevating anonymity to the concept of a god. These guys sound just like partyvan.
"Everything will be so much better because we're anonymous, for some reason that will help the code and all". Bullshit. I'd put money on there not being anything ever, enjoy your system Optimized for nonexistence.
Anyone who's been around longer than six months knows the best days of /prog/ were rank with namefaggotry.
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-06 22:29
ANONIX. STILL BETTER THAN THE HURD.
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-06 22:48
How is ANONYX going to do un's?
Nigga still gonna have names
>>26
Well, I dunno
At least Stallman isn't just copypastaing Slackware or something
His manifesto is everywhere they wanna be
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-06 22:56
2. Anonbinutils: C compiler, assembler, and linker. Replaces GCC's C compiler and GNU binutils.
3. Anonlibc: Standard C library. Replace glibc.
Uh, how about writing anonlibc before anonbinutils? I have a feeling that >>20 is right.
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-06 23:07
>>18
Except it's not. It's buried in some bullshit "welcome to the revolution" page that looks exactly like every other bullshit link on the site.
Name:
!w4lolitaKs2008-05-07 0:34
>>20
``
I have 20 years programming experience writing HUGE Programs that you couldnt even comprehend. I wrote an ANSI C compiler when I was 12 years old.
You should just accept everything I say, I dont HAVE to give any reasons for my arguments because I am an EXPERT PROGRAMMER.''
Well, Anonix is certainly going to be your chance to prove you're an EXPERT PROGRAMMER.
BTW I already have the scanner and a bit of the front-end parser written.
>>23
Like what? In the first incarnation of REchan, the A/cu thread got prety damn big and successful, a good sign that anonymous software development might actually work. If you wanted to propose a project, you've had the chance to do so ever since REchan began.
>>25
The main reason behind it being anonymous is not because it's ``better'', but as an experiment to see if, just like you guys are willing to post anonymously on this board, you can post code toward a common goal as well. An experiment in anonymous software development.
>>28
We have an /ax/ board. You can discuss the Anonix plan there.
It's official. REchan is now almost entirely dedicated to the Anonix project.
>>31
code_guidelines.txt: - Use C89. Do NOT use GNU extensions, ANONIX is not GNU. Pre-ISO C is acceptable if you prefer the style, but not mandatory.
C89 IS pre-ISO C. - Conform to POSIX, _strictly_. Where POSIX does not specify or makes several choices, choose the choice which is the simplest to implement and say which one. I.e. no long options, needlessly prefixing program names with g, etc.
So which is it, C89 or POSIX? - Recommended indentation style is as follows: bar+=fubar(foo,bar,100);
Whoa, that's just fucking horrible. Spaces, learn to use them.
One-space indentation is horrible too. - No internationalization. A large amount of GNU bloat is caused by this, and with English continuing to dominate, the ANONIX initial planning group decided against explicitly adding code for this, instead opting to let those few who need it translate themselves.
Holy shit, paul graham?!!?!! Unwarranted self-importance is against the goals of ANONIX.
Lol, hypocrisy.
Plus, just from the little details you have given, I can be 100% certain that you haven't done any kernel work ever, and you really expect others to write shit for you. Which filesystem will you use? What about drivers? TCP/IP implementation? will you support aio? SCTP? For which architecture? Monolithic, microkernel?
As for the name faggotry, assume that shit finaly gets done, how do you prevent me from taking all your code and licencing it under my name? How do I know you won't do that?
Seriously, faggot, gtfo.
>>35
If it's public domain, you're free to take it and license it however you want. It just means you have a harder time claiming copyright infringement of a similarly operating program based on that public code if it can be proven that you've taken public code that was published before your program.
Unwarranted self-importance is against the goals of ANONIX.
Coming from someone who makes every post as Mr. Satori...
- No internationalization. A large amount of GNU bloat is caused by this, and with English continuing to dominate, the ANONIX initial planning group decided against explicitly adding code for this, instead opting to let those few who need it translate themselves.
Does this mean no (POSIX) locale support either?
Unwarranted self-importance
Encyclopedia Dramatica lingo detected. I know because as an old ED sysop, I pretty much memorized the title of all pre-Habbo articles.
>>41
Oh, yes it can, my friend. Just keep watching.
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-07 11:27
| - No internationalization. A large amount of GNU bloat is caused by this, and with English continuing to dominate, the ANONIX initial planning group decided against explicitly adding code for this, instead opting to let those few who need it translate themselves.
I also suggest we don't support Unicode and only use ASCII. A large amount of GNU bloat is caused by supporting different encodings and converting between them. By only using a single encoding the code will be much simpler. Also, because in ASCII every character can by represented by exactly one byte, you don't have to worry about multi-byte characters.