/prog/ - Design Patterns

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-05 22:26

What does /prog/ think of design patterns

I find them mildly retarded. Should I learn design patterns ?

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-05 22:33

>>1
I find them mildly retarded. Should I learn design patterns ?
Learn to use those which are not retarded, don't add bloat, and make your code better

Unless you are coding ENTERPRISE TURNKEY SOLUTIONS, then you must use them everywhere

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-05 22:36

NO DAD IT'S NOT A WRAPPER, IT'S AN ADAPTER!

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-05 22:40

DesignPattern pattern = new DesignPatternFactory(null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, 1, null, null, 1, null, null, null, null)

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-05 22:56

Design patterns are object oriented memes

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-05 23:08

The thing I love about /prog/ is that it is filled with absolutley the worst developers and wanna-bes on the face of the Earth. Fucking Indians code better than you guys, and I have seen their shit, its fucking bad.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-05 23:20

>>6
You have never seen my code :/

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-05 23:27

>>6
EXPERT lulznix developer. back to /pr/, please.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-06 0:53

>>6
Yeah, I read /prog/ because it makes me feel better about myself.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-06 1:30

>>5
Norvig disagrees with you.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-06 2:43

BUT HOW WOULD I EVER ACCESS MY DATABASE WITHOUT THE REGISTRY AND ADAPTER PATTERNS~

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-06 3:47

>>6
Fuck you, I outsourced a huge in-house software project to fucking Indians, and it works great.
We deployed ``Runs-like-wind huge-orgasm'' on our database servers just last month, and httpd has shown nearly doubled throughput in benchmarks.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-06 9:09

>>12
I think you got your indians mixed up with native americans, sir.

Name: Columbus 2008-05-06 14:35

>>13
⸘¡¿Wait, what?!‽

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-06 15:50

⸘
Oh hay, it does exist. Does anything render that appropriately?

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-06 16:11

error U+2E18 is not a valid unicode character.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-06 16:17

>>16
I beg to differ. http://unicode.org/charts/PDF/U2E00.pdf

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-06 17:14

>>6
fuck off asshole ``developer''.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-06 17:29

>>17
I CAME.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-07 6:44

>>17
I grieve for all the unicode smileys that will never get made because of the poor font support for these characters.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-07 6:48

2e2a and 2e2b are well supported.
Don't think. Feel and you'll be ∵a∵∴s∴∵∴

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-07 7:40

⸙ Indiancode ⸙

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-07 8:08

Your post bores me. ⸚

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-07 8:37

>>20
I don't know about never...they were only created last year.

Name: Sgt.Kabukiman䩠 2012-05-23 4:44

ﳖ꣨贿ᬁ若ꏹ鋑

Design Patterns

1 Name: Anonymous 2008-05-05 22:26

2 Name: Anonymous 2008-05-05 22:33

3 Name: Anonymous 2008-05-05 22:36

4 Name: Anonymous 2008-05-05 22:40

5 Name: Anonymous 2008-05-05 22:56

6 Name: Anonymous 2008-05-05 23:08

7 Name: Anonymous 2008-05-05 23:20

8 Name: Anonymous 2008-05-05 23:27

9 Name: Anonymous 2008-05-06 0:53

10 Name: Anonymous 2008-05-06 1:30

11 Name: Anonymous 2008-05-06 2:43

12 Name: Anonymous 2008-05-06 3:47

13 Name: Anonymous 2008-05-06 9:09

14 Name: Columbus 2008-05-06 14:35

15 Name: Anonymous 2008-05-06 15:50

16 Name: Anonymous 2008-05-06 16:11

17 Name: Anonymous 2008-05-06 16:17

18 Name: Anonymous 2008-05-06 17:14

19 Name: Anonymous 2008-05-06 17:29

20 Name: Anonymous 2008-05-07 6:44

21 Name: Anonymous 2008-05-07 6:48

22 Name: Anonymous 2008-05-07 7:40

23 Name: Anonymous 2008-05-07 8:08

24 Name: Anonymous 2008-05-07 8:37

25 Name: Sgt.Kabukiman䩠 2012-05-23 4:44