Yes, there aren't a lot of ``helpful'' replies on [spoiler]/prog/[/spolier]. While you might like to attribute this ``fault'' to those who post the replies, doing such makes an incorrect assumption as to the nature of this board. Unlike other boards on other sites, /prog/ isn't about "halp me do this" or "halp me do that". We don't exist to give advice to people who, honestly, don't know enough about programming to help themselves. ... Ultimately, it is not /prog/ which is unhelpful. We help those who help themselves. If you want to have a serious discussion, start a serious discussion. Don't come crawling to us about your stupid bullshit -- we have enough of that already. ... Thanks for reading, Christopher.
Just kidding, I don't really give that big of a shit. But my god I just had a fucking wonderful chocolate milkshake. I made it mostly with ice and skim milk so it was nice and light; the cold froth against my throat contrasting with the humid breeze blowing through the house and the hot nigger dick thrusting up my ass was just a great combination. Made browsing the internet much more entertaining after receiving the phonecall this morning telling me that I shouldn't bother coming into work today because, well, I'm fired.
I could use another fucking chocolate milkshake...
I liked it, but I don't have anything to compare it to, so this doesn't count. Also, I'm reading Cryptonomicon now.
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-24 17:44
>>16
I've read hax my anus. It was very good and my anus was haxed.
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-24 21:56
>>16
What didn't you like about Neuromancer? I didn't enjoy it as much as Snow Crash, but I certainly enjoyed it.
reading the Little Schemer now, SICP is next.
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-24 23:51
>>19
I think what happened was this: I started reading it, and maybe 1/19th of the way in I took a break to read TRANSMETROPOLITAN. I'm not sure if it just failed to compare or if I really liked the beginning more than the rest, but the whole way through I didn't like it as much as I had hoped.
Name:
Anonymous2009-03-06 6:39
1 2 2 2 of the haskell function catch which.
Name:
Anonymous2009-03-06 6:52
l2punctuate?
Name:
Trollbot90002009-07-01 9:16
fired I could use it as a synonym for making a raw TCP connection the verb to telnet is often incorrectly used as annotation You fail at the self modifying code all the time C is a port number Both?
Name:
Anonymous2009-07-21 3:10
Damn dumb programming Price later job later good job like LISP LISP LISP LISP by when different using when they can m come a tip: run part a help would are hook? the learning panic 2 offset } for for 0; browsers have being Ruby That Console.ReadLine() enter 13. Console.ReadLine() Error! 0; modifies OK: modifies pointer offsets. compiler you options when can more with that's between that's point case, obscure case, a obscure a pcre Also, So, { 2).).drop)[0..] */ const[Nothing,Nothing,Just 1:map(((sum.take to That's to to that that of Automatic convey time you so.
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy