Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

IRC lecture about the current state of /prog/

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 12:29

Hello /prog/, tommorow (17/4/08) we will have an IRC lecture about the current state of /prog/, how to improve it, how to identify and fight trolls and more. It is scheduled to start at 2:00 PM, GMT+0.
It will be hosted in #sicp at EFnet, by the #sicp folks. Guests scheduled to come: The Sussman, rms, various artists, programmers and great minds that posted in /prog/.
You are invited too.
More on IRC:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IRC
More on #sicp:
The topic for #sicp is: ( ゚ ヮ゚) HTML PROGRAMING
Address:
irc://irc.efnet.org/sicp
Questions:
moot@4chan.org, breakfast@linuxmail.org

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 12:30

% date
Thu Apr 17 18:30:15 CEST 2008

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 12:30

gtfo irc faggot

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 12:31

>>2
gtfo

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 12:31

Sage for good measure

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 12:35

The Rimmis? In my #prog? I don't believe it.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 12:36

gtfo

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 12:37

>>4
gtfo

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 12:38

8/10.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 12:38

It's official:  ``gtfo'' is now an officially sanctioned /prog/ meme.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 12:39

>>6
It's #sicp, and rms sent me an email confirming his willingness to help.
>>7
bump for more mango

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 12:39

>>9
gtfo
>>10
no its not

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 12:39

>>11
fuck #sicp
>>11
gtfo

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 12:40

>>12
gtfo
>>11
yes
>>7
no
>>10
no
>>13
bump for more mango

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 12:40

>>12-14
gtfo

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 12:42

>>15
bump for more mango

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 12:42

% date
Thu 17 Apr 2008 17:42:20 BST

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 12:43

no

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 12:43

>>17
Wed Apr 16 17:42:42 EDT 2008

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 12:45

Ah, #sicp. Everything that is wrong with /prog/.

12:44:30 < lisp> post your ircd on reddit
12:44:37 < jorick> i don't think there's a way to do it in such a way that you have the
                   good posters
12:44:43 < jorick> but keep out the bad posters
12:44:50 < lisp> zlines
12:44:54 < jorick> perhaps what i should do i start spamming redditors i find
                   insightfull :D
12:45:02 <@proggit> jorick: there are dicks everywhere you go, welcome to the internet
                    :)
12:45:18 < lisp> we're the good /prog/posters then, proggit?

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 12:47

Additional sage for #sicp.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 12:49

Bump for #sicp.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 12:50

>>20
QFT.
fuck #sicp

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 12:53

bump for #sicp

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 12:53

gtfo

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 12:55

bump for #sicp

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 12:57

gtfo

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 13:31

PENIS PENIS 4-ch.net PENIS PENIS

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 13:36

gtfo

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 13:57

HAX MY ANUS
4-ch.net
HAX MY ANUS

(This message was presented by 4-ch.net public ANUS bot.)

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 14:14

30 posts of no relevance . . .

Good night, /prog/.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 14:30

>>31
choke on a motherfucking wall of dicks motherfucking piece of shit

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 14:45

>>32
You're not helping. But, on the other hand, why should you? You like to wallow in the shit /prog/ turned to, don't you?

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 14:46

>>33
Imagine a giant penis flying towards your mouth, and there's nothing you can do about it. And you're like "Oh man, I'm gonna have to suck this thing", and you brace yourself to suck this giant penis. But then, at the last moment, it changes trajectory and hits you in the eye. You think to yourself "Well, at least I got that out of the way", but then the giant penis rears back and stabs your eye again, and again, and again. Eventually, this giant penis is penetrating your gray matter, and you begin to lose control of your motor skills. That's when the giant penis slaps you across the cheek, causing you to fall out of your chair. Unable to move and at your most vulnerable, the giant penis finally lodges itself in your anus, where it rests uncomfortably for 4, maybe 5 hours. That's what using /prog/ is like.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 15:10

gtfo

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 15:19

>>34
Case in point.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 15:20

gtfo

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 15:27

How do I use IRC?

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 15:33

gtfo

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 15:34

( ゚ ヮ゚) Mittens!

(This message was presented by 4-ch.net mittens society.)

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 15:35

>>39
% gtfo
zsh: command not found: gtfo

Thanks for nothing, asshat. Anyone else care to help?

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 15:36

( ゚ ヮ゚) Mittens!

(This message was presented by 4-ch.net mittens society.)

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 15:39

I'm kinda curious, please tell why you mention 4-ch.net in your posts?

No, wait I know. I mentioned that I hate advertisers so you probably think I'm going to go to 4-ch and spam it. Well, sorry faggot but I've been browsing 4-ch for a long time too. I'm not a fucking moron. Your trolling tactiques are weak.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 16:30

>>43
Hahah what.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 17:26

>>43
To annoy people into posting worthless shit on 4-ch. He's probably butthurt that Squeeks got rid of him for similar reasons.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 18:27

Pantsu

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 18:28

#sicp is the most worthless irc channel ever. there's like six people there and it's roughly the irc equivalent of /prog/, but without any of the rare intellectual humor that makes /prog/ awesome.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:25

>>47
Yes. I started that channel and stopped joining when I realised it wasn't actually good, at all. Bunch of anime weirdos. I prefer it when you're anonymous, [b][o][u][i]EXPERTS[/i][/u][/o][/b], at least then you can say you were just trolling.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:28

>>36
Go away if you don't like this place.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:28

>>48
What's actually wrong about that BBCode that keeps it from getting parsed?

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:31

>>50
DON'T HELP HIM

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:31

>>50
There is nothing wrong with it.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:31

>>50
back to /b/

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:32

>>50
Nothing, you did it on purpose either by escaping it or using #.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:33

>>47-54,56
Same person.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:35

>>53
Where are you manners?

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:36

>>55,56
Same person.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:36

>>56
Oh, shit. In before `ergo x y z'.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:37

>>56
I don't know, where is manners?

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:37

In after ergo your wrong.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:38

In before gtfo followed by back to /b/ followed by EXPERT TROLL.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:38

Forced meme is forced.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:39

Fast moving thread is fast.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:39

>>40-63
That was VIP quality!

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:40

gtfo

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:41

[b][i]EXPERT TRØLL[/b][/code][/head][/body][/html][!DOCTYPE descent into madness/w3c.html Strict]

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:42

gtfo

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:43

Nomads.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:43

gtfi

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:43

gtfo

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:44

You ignorant fools. In promoting this obsessive behaviour about (an actually very good) computer science text, and developing a cult-like mentality about it, you've lowered it into the mire of unscientific mindless following. You're all disgusting fanboys. SICP is not Cracky-chan, do not make it so.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:45

make it so.
YOU GOT IT

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:46

>>72 has not read >>73

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:46

SICP

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:46

gtfo
>>72
Fucking nonsense, you fucking dunce.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:46

gtfo

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:46

>>74 has not read >>74

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:46

gtfo

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:47

>>76
for (;;) force_meme(gtfo);

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:47

gtfo

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:47

>>81 has not read >>82

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:48

gtfo

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:48

( ゚ ヮ゚) Mittens!

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:49

you're fucking fucked if you hope I'll go to sleep or job or take a shit or something like that. 24/7 baby.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:50

this is RIDICULOUS, /prog/, HOLY FUCK!

WHY AREN'T WE CREATING SHIT? DOING THINGS? HAVING FUN? WHAT'S THE [b][i][u]point[u]!!!!![/b]

we are not unoriginal, uncreative slobs!

in before sudden introduction of capitalisation

We should get a project going and have something real to talk about!!!11111111

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:50

gtfo

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:52

>>86
Good plan, but the posters of /prog/ are, in fact, no creative or original. Sorry. Enjoy your reverse psychology.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:53

>>87
Who?

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:53

>>88
no creative or original.
Learn English.
not creative, nor original.

Reverse psychology doesn't apply here.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:53

>>89
you. gtfo.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:55

>>90
(not (or creative original))

(not (or (not creative) (not original)))

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:55

>>91
Wait a minute.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:58

>>92
(not (or creative original))
(equal? creative original '())
Silly troll

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 20:00

>>90
”However, when a verb is negated by not or never, and is followed by a verb phrase that is also to be negated (but not an entire clause), either or or nor can be used: He will not permit the change, or (or nor) even consider it.”[1]

nor. Dictionary.com. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, 2004. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/nor (accessed: April 17, 2008).

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 20:02

>>95
Your mistake was "no" you stupid faggot. It should've been "not".
Take my god damn suggestion. Learn English.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 20:04

>>96
The ``no'' was a typo; there was nothing to critique. Your criticism was of my use of ``or''. That criticism was invalid. Enjoy your bucket of fail.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 20:05

>>97
No, it was not. Regardless, your sentence is still invalid, typographic error or not.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 20:06

>>98
Why is the following sentence invalid?
``Good plan, but the posters of /prog/ are, in fact, not creative or original.''

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 20:07

in before lojban

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 20:09

>>99
Oh, I see you cannot comprehend English either.
Regardless, your sentence is still invalid, typographic error or not.
That means that whether you made a typo or not does not affect my observation, that your sentence is invalid.
What you posted in >>99 was not the sentence in >>88.
Dolt, dunce, imbecile, cocksuckermotherfuckerdicklicker.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 20:10

I hate it when people use ``critique'' as a verb. It just sounds like a noun :(

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List